Updates and insights on data ownership in the AI era — exploring how permission builds a safer, more transparent, and rewarding digital future.

As well as being core values of Permission, transparency and trust are important aspects of all cryptocurrency businesses. While the current Internet has always been dominated by businesses whose operations are opaque and deliberately hidden in the shadows, the advent of the blockchain holds out the promise of something refreshingly different.
Permission.io sees itself as part of a new generation of businesses that has such values at its foundation and which will help to define a more evolved Internet.
Nevertheless, this refreshing new world approach has been tarnished by examples of fraudulent behavior from a few cryptocurrency companies. In addition to that, the cryptocurrency world has also proved to be a natural target for hackers and bad actors. And whenever they succeed in their criminal endeavors, unwelcome publicity ensues.
Thus in the minds of some people, cryptocurrency businesses are suspect. A company that is helping to change this is Messari.
Messari states its company mission with the following words:
We want to help investors, regulators, and the public make sense of this revolutionary new asset class, and are building data tools that will drive informed decision making and investment. We believe that crypto will democratize access to information, break down data silos, and ultimately give everyone the tools to build wealth.
Messari delivers a means of measuring the transparency of cryptocurrency companies. It developed its own set of methods for computing metrics (over 100 quantitative metrics) and to classifying assets (15+ qualitative classifications) for such companies.
It also provides the Messari Disclosures Registry, in the form of an open-source database that can be accessed by anyone.
Permission.io, along with more than 60 other cryptocurrency businesses, has been verified against the Messari transparency index. You will find our registry details at https://messari.io/asset/permission. Messari updates such details regularly.
As soon as we became aware of Messari, its methodology, and the disclosure registry, we were keen to participate and thus we have subjected ourselves to Messari’s standardized test for assessing the truthfulness and completeness of our project’s transparency. We consider Messari to have established itself as the natural standard for due diligence and research in the cryptocurrency sector.
Messari’s methodology enables individuals and organizations to compare “like with like” when investigating businesses in this space. Studying its methodology and the indexes it uses is an education in itself.
We are proud to be included in Messari’s registry of transparency-verified companies, alongside other leading and well-known crypto companies such as Blockstack, Waves, Dash, Cardano, Ethereum Classic and Zcash.
No matter where you go, you are being constantly bombarded with ads.
You see them on the streets while you are walking to your favorite café, before watching movies in the cinema, and when you read the latest news on your smartphone.
Sometimes, we can’t blame businesses for these tactics. Many earn their revenue by placing advertisements on their apps so people can use them free of charge.
Nevertheless, others grab every possible chance to increase their profits by displaying tons of annoying ads in their apps, which provides a horrible experience to users.
Loading too many ads on smartphone and tablet devices – like the iPhone and iPads – drains the devices’ battery quickly while using increased mobile data.
Some consumers choose to support their favorite content creators by interacting with advertisements in their apps. But no one can blame those who decide to block ads on their devices to restore the user experience and the privacy advertisers have taken away from them.
Fortunately, users can set up ad blockers on their smartphones to eliminate the ads and trackers in the apps they use and on the websites they visit. And even if you use an ad-block solution, you can still support your favorite content creators by whitelisting their apps or websites.
Before we take a deep-dive into showing you the best ad blockers for iPhone and iPad, let’s first see what ad-block software is for iOS.
The most basic version of an iOS ad blocker eliminates ads, trackers, and other intrusive content from the web pages you visit via your browser (mostly in Safari) on iPhone and iPad devices.
On the other hand, advanced ad-block software can even prevent ads from showing in most apps on your smartphone, providing a (near) ad-free experience to iOS users.
Ad blockers for iPhone and iPad devices use different methods to get rid of ads.
The first and most common way is to identify the advertising content on a web page or in an app and replace it with something else before it gets displayed on the user’s device.
Other solutions completely disable these requests, leaving broken links or holes in the places where you would normally see the ad.
One of the most effective methods to block ads on smartphone devices is to encrypt the user’s DNS traffic via a local VPN, allowing the iOS ad blocker to work in all (or at least most of the) apps on the device.
As a result, an iOS ad blocker allows you to have an ad-free experience while playing your favorite games, browsing the web, or using your favorite apps on your iPhone or iPad device.
Also, since you load much fewer advertisements, ad blockers may increase the device’s performance while decreasing your energy consumption and data usage.
Furthermore, as ad-block solutions disable malicious ads and trackers, they also help keep your smartphone device more secure against cyber attacks and fraud.
Now that you know the basics, let’s see the best iOS ad blockers for iPhone and iPad devices.
AdGuard is a prominent multi-device (iOS, Android, Mac, Windows, web browser) ad blocker solution that offers system-wide protection.
Based on the version you choose, the ad blocker blocks ads, trackers, and other intrusive content either in Safari or in all apps on your iPhone or iPad device.
In addition to a 4+ average rating on TrustPilot, numerous recommendations on forums and social media, independent review sites have been considering AdGuard as one of the best ad blockers for iOS devices.
As a side note, we have also included AdGuard on the top of our list of best Android ad blockers.
The basic version of AdGuard allows you to block ads in the Safari browser.
If you choose the basic AdGuard, it will operate as a simple content blocker that works similarly to ad-block extensions for desktop browsers.
However, instead of installing directly from your browser’s extension marketplace, you have to download the AdGuard application from the App Store to set up the ad-block software on iOS devices.
It’s important to mention – and this will apply to all ad blockers that work in browsers only – that Apple only allows simple content blockers to operate in Safari without support for other browser apps like Chrome or Firefox.
Therefore, if you are looking to block ads in other iOS browsers, we recommend setting up an ad-block solution that offers system-wide protection against advertisements.
In Safari, AdGuard uses regularly-updated filters to screen the websites you visit and remove advertising content as well as different web trackers from the pages.
On the other hand, the pro version of the iOS ad blocker includes a DNS protection module that encrypts your DNS traffic to achieve higher levels of privacy.
With DNS protection enabled, AdGuard sets up a local VPN to block ads and web trackers in Safari and also in other apps on your iPhone or iPad device.
Whether you use the basic or the Pro version of the app, AdGuard allows you to customize both the blacklisted (the sites where you block ads) and the whitelisted (the websites where you allow ads) domains within the ad-block software’s interface.
As mentioned earlier, iOS users can choose to use either the basic AdGuard software or AdGuard Pro.
While the basic version is free, AdGuard Pro is a paid subscription that offers advanced features, such as DNS protection, custom filters, and security filters, for iPhone and iPad users.
If you are looking for a minimalistic ad blocker for iPhone or iPad, Wipr is probably your best choice.
However, unlike AdGuard’s pro version, Wipr only blocks ads on Safari. Therefore, if you want to disable ads on your entire system, you have to use an alternative iOS ad-block solution. Also, the app doesn’t offer too many options for customization.
But in exchange, you get a simple app you can use easily to block browser ads in iOS without amassing too much of your smartphone’s system resources.
From this list of best iOS ad blockers, Wipr features the easiest setup process.
After downloading the application from the App Store, you only need to tap a button to get the ad-block software up and running.
By doing so, Wipr will block all trackers, ads, crypto miners, EU cookie, and GDPR notices, as well as other disturbing content when you are browsing the web with Safari or other apps that use Safari to display web pages.
In addition to saving you time with the easy setup process, Wipr automatically updates its blacklist in the background to provide up-to-date protection against intrusive web content.
Apart from its simplicity, what we like the best about Wipr is that the service provider refuses to accept money from advertisers seeking to get their ads whitelisted by ad-block solutions.
While Wipr is not free, you can purchase the app for a small, one-time fee of $1.99.
Optionally, you can choose to support the iOS ad-block solution’s creators with in-app donations.
The next iOS ad blocker on our list is 1Blocker that offers numerous options for iPhone and iPad users to customize how they eliminate advertisements.
Like Wipr, 1Blocker doesn’t offer system-wide protection for iOS. However, it’s a great app to eliminate all kinds of ads and intrusive content while browsing the web via Safari.
Like Wipr, it’s super easy to set up 1Blocker as you only need to tick the boxes next to the content you seek to block in Safari.
Also, its creators designed 1Blocker as a native, lightweight app that uses only a limited amount of system resources.
To improve the browser’s speed, instead of modifying web pages, the iOS ad-block software uses filters for Safari.
According to the service provider, 1Blocker can decrease web page load times in Safari by two to five times on average.
Also, you don’t have to worry about heavy updates as the ad blocker updates its Safari filters automatically via silent cloud updates.
1Blocker allows iPhone and iPad users to customize both blacklists and whitelists as well as the type of content you want to eliminate from Safari web pages, including:
While you can download 1Blocker for free, the basic version of the ad-block software is limited to blocking one content type (e.g., ads, trackers, or adult sites).
To protect against all types of intrusive web content, you have to pay a monthly or a yearly subscription fee.
Alternatively, you can purchase a lifetime subscription for a more expensive, one-time fee.
For those of you who possess basic technical skills and who are not afraid to dedicate some of your time to configure the app, we have included a geeky way to provide system-wide protection against ads on iOS.
While you need to do some configuration before you can block ads on your iOS device, using this method doesn’t cost you anything.
For this, we will use DNSCloak, a secure privacy app for iPhone and iPad that lets you override your DNS settings to eliminate ads and trackers from both the ads you use and the websites you visit on your smartphone.
Remember AdGuard’s Pro version?
The paid version of the ad blocker software provides DNS protection to its users by setting up a local VPN to disable advertisement-related requests.
This way, you eliminate ads not only on the web but also in the apps on your smartphone or tablet device, achieving system-wide protection against disturbing digital content.
By using DNSCloak, you can achieve the same level of protection against intrusive iOS content at no cost.
However, to achieve that, you have to configure DNSCloak first. For the exact steps, we recommend checking out this article.
While AdGuard doesn’t charge you for using its DNS, you can download and install the DNSCloak app at no cost.
Therefore, upon successful configuration, you don’t have to pay a dime to block ads on your entire iOS system.
Developed by Mozilla, Firefox Focus is a privacy-focused web browser for iPhone, iPad, and Android devices.
Firefox Focus is free, and it has built-in capabilities to block ads, trackers, and analytics software while you are browsing the web.
The app is quite straightforward to use.
You set up the type of content you want to block – web trackers, analytics software, fonts, and ads – and Firefox Focus will automatically disable them while you are browsing the internet.
To achieve even more privacy, Firefox Focus automatically deletes your browsing data (including history and passwords) after you finish surfing the web.
As a plus, Firefox Focus can be integrated with Safari, enabling the same protection against intrusive content in the latter browser.
Firefox Focus is free to download and use without in-app purchases or subscriptions.
As we are bombarded with tons of ads every day, it’s essential to use an ad blocker solution. This way, you can have a good user experience, protect your privacy, and block malicious content while browsing the web, reading the news, or playing your favorite game on your iOS smartphone or tablet.
Ad blockers for iPhone and iPad devices not only help you achieve an ad-free experience, but they can also speed up your device as well as decrease your smartphone’s energy and data usage.
You can choose from iOS ad blockers that offer system-wide protection against advertisements or use an application that disables ads exclusively in your web browser.
However, you don’t necessarily have to use an ad blocker software to have a non-intrusive user experience on the web.
With Permission, we have created a blockchain-based digital advertising platform where users can earn ASK cryptocurrency for the ongoing sharing of their time and data while engaging with ads. By volunteering to receive ads in exchange for compensation, users receive relevant, personalized content and get paid for it.
This advertising model also benefits brands that place ads and content on the Permission.io platform as they can increase their ROI while building long-term relationships with their (potential) customers.
If you are interested in learning more about how to earn from your data, we highly recommend checking out Permission's official website or following our official Twitter page.
You may have read the word “blockchain” a thousand times without properly understanding what one is. If so, you are definitely not alone, and even if you think you know, read on. You’ll enjoy it, I promise. I wrote it with you in mind.
The blockchain is revolutionary — revolutionary like the invention of the light bulb, not revolutionary like Vladimir Ilyich Lenin — and it will serve you to know why.
No doubt you understand that in order to create a cryptocurrency you need to build a blockchain, and if you didn’t understand that, take my word for it, you do.
An accurate definition of blockchain would insist that it is a digital database containing transactions (often financial ones) that can be used and shared within a publicly accessible network such as the Internet.
However, let me boil all those words down to the important piece of information that few people tell you when they write about the blockchain. It is this:
The blockchain is a shared database.
When you understand this, it becomes easier to understand why a blockchain is organized in the way it is. So let me exhume the meaning of the above all-important and very short sentence.
A database is a way to share data. Yes, I know, there are lots of different types of databases — relational, document, XML, triplestore, etc. What they all have in common is that they allow data to be shared between different applications. Databases have well-thought-out standard interfaces that any program can use to get at the data. A blockchain is no different in that respect.
What makes it very different is that it enables data to be shared between organizations in a trustable way.
Hopefully, the first question in your mind is this: Why can’t all those other kinds of databases do that?
The answer is simple: They can’t be fully trusted.
Consider two organizations, A and B. A has data in a database and wishes to let B access that data, and add new data. Maybe such an arrangement will work fine, but maybe it won’t. Here’s how it can fail:
Even if both A and B do their level best to make the arrangement work, it can all go catawampus. The Internet is alive with security problems.
A blockchain database is different because it is secure — bullet-proof secure, superman secure, Internet secure.
Because of that if A and B wish to implement a shared database, they can achieve that by implementing a blockchain to manage the data they wish to share. Problem solved.
I’ll explain step by step.
The first thing to know is that just like other databases, the blockchain writes data away in blocks. Databases have done this since before the deluge because it works way better than writing records away one at a time. So the “block” part of blockchain is no different from other databases. It is the “chain” part that is different.
All the blocks in a blockchain are chained together in the order in which they were created. The first block is connected to the second block, and the second block is connected to the third block and the third block is connected to the fourth block, now hear the word of the Lord.
The fact that they are connected is no big deal, it’s how they are connected that matters. They are connected by a hash.
Unless you’re a programmer type, you won’t know what a hash is. Let me tell you. Firstly, it has nothing at all to do with hash browns or hashish. A hash is a mathematical function that can be applied to a string of binary information, such as, well, a block of data that you want to write to a database.
I could try to explain the math, but let’s not bother. I’ll assume that you waved goodbye to hard mathematics sometime during your education and you are in no hurry to get reacquainted. Just accept that you can apply a hashing function to a block of data and it will spit out a string of numbers and characters like this: 39A1H55ZZ5178.
What’s really sneaky about the hash function is that if you change just one piece of data, even a single bit, the hash value that the hash function spits out will also change. So the blockchain, instead of just writing the block of data away, attaches the hash value of the previous block to the block, then hashes the block, and then writes the block away with the hash value it calculated.
So now the stored block looks like this: Hash-value-of-previous-block, block data, Hash-value-of-this-block.
And this means that:
In summary, this means that the block has become unchangeable — as unchangeable as the stars in the sky.
Now, if you have a criminal turn of mind, you may be thinking:
Wait a minute…
What is to stop me from taking control of the computer running the blockchain software, unraveling a few blocks, then altering a few records to grab a stack of someone else’s Bitcoin and drop them into my personal wallet, and then rewriting all the details with new hash values?
The answer is Consensus.
Consensus stops you from doing that. In practice, there won’t be just one computer creating new blocks, there will be many. In the case of Bitcoin, for example, there are thousands. And because the Bitcoin blockchain was the first blockchain, I’m going to use the way it works to explain consensus.
The blockchain doesn’t live on just one server computer, it is copied across a multitude. Each one of these servers is competing obsessively-compulsively to write the next block.
To enable this desperate crush of computers to compete in this sprint, all the transactions are sent to all of them. No computer is allowed to write the next block without solving a mathematical computing problem which relates to the data values stored in the block.
It’s a hashing problem of a kind, but I’ll not try to explain it, I’ll just provide an appropriate link for the benefit of those who are not mathematically challenged.
It’s a race against time, but the computing problem has been constructed in such a way that no particular computer can be guaranteed to win. Thus, it is impossible to predict which computer will write the next block.
The first computer that solves the problem gets that privilege and is rewarded with 6.25 Bitcoin — no small reward at current prices. This arrangement for mining Bitcoin is called “Proof of Work” because the victorious computer is able to prove that it did the work to find an answer.
If you are thinking, “that’s a completely goofy way of writing a one-megabyte block of data”, I agree with you. Furiously.
Think about it. You get thousands of computers to compete to solve a problem and you give the winner a prize.
I mean that has to cost, doesn’t it?
Yes, it does. It costs plenty. In fact, with Bitcoin, it is fabulously expensive. It has been estimated that Bitcoin mining consumes about sixty-one terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity per year, which is (and I am not lying through my back teeth here) about as much electricity every year as the country of Switzerland.
And on top of that, there’s the cost of the Bitcoin mining computers which you cannot buy by the truckload at Dollar Tree. You will pay over $1,000 for just one and much more for what is termed “a mining rig”. That’s multi-millions of dollars of silicon tied up in mining Bitcoin. And by the way, those are specialist computers that can only be used for mining.
Even if you get your electricity cheap, for example in Iceland for 6 cents a Kwh, that still amounts to $3.66 billion per year.
Bitcoin mining didn’t start out expensive. When the infant Bitcoin first emerged from the maternity ward, most of the mining was done on dusty old seen-better-days computers.
Back in the day, prior to July 2010, you could buy Bitcoin for less than a cent, and in those days a cent bought you about six-kilowatt minutes of electricity. Aside from a handful of geeks and crazy coders, nobody was mining Bitcoin.
That’s the bizarre business dynamic of Bitcoin; mining activity is driven by the price of the coin.
As the price of the coin rose it attracted more miners. Eventually, there were too many and some dropped out. Others realized that they could make more money by using better computers, making those dusty old PCs redundant. Powerful gaming computers gave up gaming and took up mining.
It became an arms race.
Chip manufacturers realized they could make money by designing chips that were dedicated to mining Bitcoin. These were called ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits).
That isn’t the only factor at play here. It’s complicated to explain, but it only consumes the rest of this paragraph, so feel free to skip past it. The difficulty of the mathematical hashing problem can be altered and is regularly adjusted in a way that directly relates to an estimate of the computer power deployed for mining. This adjustment is made every 2016 blocks (about every 2 weeks) in order to keep the average time between writing a new block to about 10 minutes.
If you are wondering who the hell thought up this scheme… to impose a consensus system on the writing away of blocks of data to a blockchain, which has resulted in thousands of specialized computers competitively solving math problems 24 hours a day to earn the right to write the next block, while consuming enough electricity to keep the lights on in Switzerland, and thereby earning money… the answer is Satoshi Nakamoto.
That’s a question I cannot answer because Satoshi Nakamoto is a pseudonym. If you’re thinking “Oh, he’s one of those modest Japanese guys you encounter in Ninja movies who is obsessed with economics and good at playing Go”, you may be right.
Or maybe he’s a shady ex-KGB operative who intends to undermine the US Dollar. Or maybe he’s a Libertarian hacktivist who thinks he’s striking a blow for financial freedom.
In a world where everyone seems desperate to grab a minimum of 15 minutes of fame, perhaps the most famous cryptographer since Alan Turing has decided to stay anonymous and has covered his tracks so well that nobody seems to know who he is. Perhaps he read about what the Brits did to Alan Turing and decided that anonymity had very definite virtues.
But never mind. The scheme that Satoshi Nakamoto invented: digital blockchain currencies and mining for consensus, was a brilliant conception. He will go down in history as one of the world’s great innovators — and because he was anonymous, every country on the planet will probably claim him as their own.
The Bitcoin blockchain has stood the test of time. It has never been successfully hacked and it has launched the value of its cryptocurrency into the stratosphere.
It has proved itself despite the fact that it has been declared dead over 380 times. This includes pronouncements by such legendary luminaries as Steven Mnuchin, Nouriel Roubini, Warren Buffet, and Paul Krugman to mention just a few.
However, even its avid fans must surely understand that there has to be a better way of achieving block writing consensus than by chewing up all of Switzerland’s electricity. And indeed there is. Think about it.
Here’s what we are gunning for: we want a network of a significant number of computers none of whom can conspire with each other to change the contents of the latest block. If we can’t achieve that then we do not have “immutability” and thus the blockchain is no more reliable than any other kind of database.
We need to limit the ownership of these computers so that no single provider of such resources can dominate the writing of blocks, and neither can any cartel of resource providers. For the record, achieving dominance of the population of block-writing computers is called a 51% attack. If you can mount a 51% attack you destroy the security of the blockchain and the currency that it supports.
Actually, there are many schemes for doing this that do not involve mining. The most prominent is called Proof Of Stake where a number of resource providers (who are in effect stakeholders) provide computers for block-writing and the computer that gets to write the next block is determined in some unpredictable way that does not involve electricity-hungry mathematics.
In fact, there are many different consensus methods: Aside from the two already discussed, there is: Delegated Proof of Stake (DPOS), Proof of Capacity (POC), Proof of Elapsed Time (POET), Consensus as a Service (CaaS), Proof of Identity (POI), and Proof of Authority (POA) — the last of which is employed by the ASK blockchain.
If you want more details, feel free to Google.
Ok, so we know you can use blockchain technology to create a currency, but what else can you use it for?
The obvious place to look is wherever the sharing of data securely can be a problem. Here are some examples.
There’s also a really big area of blockchain applications for supply chain data.
Do you like salmon? Most people do. Do you like genuine wild-caught salmon?
Maybe you’ve never had it. Quite possibly you think you have but you haven’t.
The conservation group Oceana produced a report on this very topic. During winter 2013-2014 researchers collected 82 samples of salmon labeled “wild” from restaurants and grocery stores in Chicago, New York, Washington, D.C., and Virginia, and sneakily did DNA tests on them.
It turned out that 43% of the salmon was fraudulently labeled. 69% of the mislabeled fish were farmed Atlantic salmon. Cheaper species of salmon were labeled as top quality Chinook. And the mislabelling was more common in restaurants than grocery stores.
In a supply chain that is built on the blockchain or a series of blockchains, such food fraud is harder to perpetrate. Did that Beluga Caviar really come from the Black Sea? Did that Roquefort really come to maturity in a cave near Roquefort-sur-Soulzon?
With the blockchain, such frauds will be harder to perpetrate.
I have no doubt that the blockchain is the future of shared databases. It is simply the best technology that has ever been created for sharing data in a secure and trustworthy manner. The technology may evolve over time as all technology does, but it will not be superseded.
If you don’t believe me, just wait, and wait and wait. If you are not already using blockchain technology, you will be in a year or two. You will see more and more of it. Eventually, it will be as common as french fries in a fast-food joint.
And if, in the coming years, the blockchain dies a death and disappears — well, I was obviously wrong.
It’s the end of the road for third-party cookies—and that’s a good thing.
Perhaps you don’t know what third party cookies are. Let’s begin by explaining why cookies exist at all.
A cookie is a parcel of data stored in the browser to speed-up and simplify interactions between the browser and a website it is connected to. Any data can be stored in a cookie.
The browser provides a place where websites can store data when that website is being accessed, and the browser stores it. The idea was invented by Lou Montulli of Netscape Communications in 1994, the year that the Web was born.
The problem was that a PC could disconnect from a website for many reasons: the PC or the website might crash or the internet could disconnect. So the website cookie could store your identity data, your preferences, and maybe even session information. Then, if anything failed you could restart near to where you left off.
Since then things have become more complex and there are several different types of cookie, as follows.
These are temporary cookies that last only for the duration of a session. They tend to store mundane data like login credentials and usually evaporate when you reboot the computer or close the browser. They can also be used to help with website performance like ensuring fast page loads.
There’s unlikely to be anything objectionable stored in these cookies.
Websites that plant these cookies in your browser usually give them an expiration date, which could be any time from seconds to years.
You know you have a persistent identity cookie if you are on a website and reboot your computer only to discover when you return to the website that you are still logged in.
Such cookies are commonly used to track your on-site behavior and to tailor your user experience.
There is unlikely to be anything objectionable about these cookies either.
These cookies assist with encryption and hence are definitely good guys. They are only transmitted securely (via HTTPS) and they are used to implement security on banking and shopping websites.
They keep your financial details secret but allow the site to remember those details.
All the above are examples of first-party cookies. Technically first-party simply means that it’s a two-way arrangement between you and the website. However, many websites monitor website traffic with help from external vendors, particularly Google with Google Analytics.
The cookies placed by Google for that purpose are usually thought of as first-party cookies because they just monitor the site visit. Think of them as first-party by proxy.
Third-party cookies are what drives “behavioral advertising”. They are called third-party because none of the websites you visited put them there. They were slipped into your browser by some advertiser’s ad server.
Advertisers add tags to web pages so that in conjunction with the cookies they place, they can recognize you as you skip from one website to another. They build a user profile of you and your habits in the hope of targeting you more effectively.
Whichever way you look at this, it’s a violation. They do not seek your permission and they are aggressive.
The bad advertiser practices of the web depend on these cookies. They include:
Nowadays, 30% or so of people use ad blockers. The top three reasons for doing so, according to GlobalWebIndex, are: too many ads (48%), ads are annoying or irrelevant (47%), ads are too intrusive (44%). A lot of this can be put down to the kind of ads that third-party cookies thrust upon you.
Ad blockers are a severe problem for the digital advertising industry. It isn’t just that most users would rather see no ads. The digital publishing industry has no easy way of making a profit other than by ads. Web-users visit news and magazine sites page by page rather than go to one or two sites for their news. The web has no equivalent of a newspaper or a magazine.
However, there can be synergy between websites and ads, where ads are found in the context of a website to which they relate. The ads for yachts on a yachting blog, hiking gear on hiking blogs, and so on. Brand advertisers don’t want their brand ads to appear just anywhere, they want the context of the ad to be brand-positive.
Most advertisers, like most web users, do not want what third party cookies deliver, and neither do the software companies that develop browsers.
As I noted at the beginning of this blog, the days of the third-party cookie will soon be over. It has no useful allies. All the browsers are waging war on it.
It began with Apple. In 2017, it introduced “intelligent tracking prevention” to stop cross-site tracking by third-party cookies.
Since then, Apple has improved the capability to the point where Safari will tell you which ad trackers are running on the website you’re visiting and will provide a 30-day report of the known trackers it’s identified, and which websites the trackers came from. Safari now blocks most third-party cookies by default.
Of course, Safari has less than 10% of the browser market. So, on its own, that doesn’t spell the death of the third-party cookie.
In 2017, the Firefox browser also moved towards stronger privacy adding an optional feature that restricted cookies, cache, and other data access so that only the domain that placed the cookie had access to it.
Since then, Firefox has tightened up its privacy features. Currently, Firefox offers three levels of privacy: “Standard” (the default), “Strict”, and “Custom”. Standard blocks trackers in private (i.e. incognito) windows; it blocks third-party tracking cookies and crypto-jacking. The Strict setting does the same but also blocks fingerprinting and trackers in all windows. The Custom setting allows you to tune your privacy settings in fine detail.
As a side note, perhaps you’ve not heard of crypto-jacking. This is when a website, without so much as a “by-your-leave”, puts a script in your browser which sits there, chugging away mining cryptocurrency for the website owner. Firefox can block that.
Maybe you’ve not heard of fingerprinting either. This is when a server gathers data about your specific configuration of software and hardware in order to “fingerprint” you (i.e. assign a unique technology identity to you).
There are many details that can be gathered: your browser version and type, your OS, the timezone, active plugins, language, screen resolution, browser settings, and so on. It is really unlikely that any two users have identical information.
One study estimated that there is only a 1 in 286,777 chance that another browser will have the same fingerprint as you. The fingerprint is used to track you as you move from website to website.
Firefox’s market share is similar to Safari’s — a little under 10%.
A long time ago, Microsoft’s Internet Explorer was the dominant browser. Its market share gradually declined to a few percent and Microsoft decided to reinvent its browser with Edge.
Edge provides 3 privacy settings to choose from: “Basic”, “Balanced” (the default), and “Strict”. Balanced blocks trackers from sites you haven’t visited. Strict blocks almost all trackers. Basic block trackers used for crypto-hijacking and fingerprinting.
How much traction Edge will get is uncertain. Right now it seems to have about 4% of the browser market.
Despite a fairly low market share, Opera is perhaps the most highly functional browser. It provides configurable security that is as tight as any other, including a configurable built-in ad blocker, a crypto wallet, and a VPN. It has been offering such features since 2017.
This is another niche browser but with a much smaller user base than Opera.
By default, it blocks all ads, trackers, third-party cookies, crypto-hijacking, and third-party finger-printers. It even has a built-in TOR private browsing mode (TOR stands for “The Onion Router”, open-source software that enables fully anonymous communication).
Brave tends to attract users who care deeply about privacy.
If you add up the market share of the browsers already discussed, you get less than 30%. The market gorilla is Google Chrome with a little under 70% market share.
The death knell of the third party cookie sounded loud when Google joined the opposition with its Chrome browser. Google has decided to eradicate that scourge over a space of 2 years. Chrome will soon have a Privacy Sandbox, a privacy-preserving API.
Naturally, Google is very pro advertisements — they are its core business. So with Chrome, it is unlikely to shoot itself in the foot. It is far more likely to skew the ad market to its advantage.
Google’s intentions, in outline, are to hold individual user information in Chrome’s Privacy Sandbox and allow ad tech companies to make API calls to it. When they do so they will get access to personalization and measurement data to help them target ads and measure their impact, but they will get no access to your personal details that might help them identify you. The advertisers will get targeting data only.
The question is: if you eliminate third-party cookies how can ad tech companies target users and measure an ad’s effectiveness? The Privacy Sandbox is Google’s answer. It will run trials and make adjustments over the next two years to get it right.
Because Google Chrome is open-source, other browsers will be able to analyze what Google is doing and imitate it, if they choose to.
Publishers are particularly concerned about the Cookie Wars, because they may become collateral damage. Google released a study claiming that removing third-party cookies would reduce publisher ad revenue by 52%.
Making sure the change doesn’t greatly damage publishers is a sensible priority. So Google’s upcoming trials will compare monetization for publishers between the old and new setup for Google’s digital ad business (Google’s search ads and YouTube are unaffected).
What is an IDFA? The abbreviation stands for IDentifier For Advertisers, Apple’s unique mobile device number provided to ad exchanges to help them track user interactions and behavior.
It is the mobile device’s equivalent of a third-party cookie, enabling user tracking, marketing measurement, attribution, ad targeting, ad monetization, device graphs, retargeting of individuals and audiences, and programmatic advertising from demand-side platforms (DSPs), supply-side platforms (SSPs), and exchanges.
If you were unaware that Apple assigns a number to your iOS device to help track you, I’m not surprised. It may be because it is an opt-out feature you have to notice and opt-out of to prevent its use (if you have an iPhone or iPad and wish to opt-out, go to Settings > Privacy > Advertising and then turn “Limit Ad Tracking” on).
Recently, however, because of Apple’s increasing concern for its customers’ privacy, it decided to make the IDFA opt-in for every single application. Thus, with the release of iOS 14 in September 2020, each app on your device will have to ask you if you want to opt-in and reveal your IDFA.
Apple‘s change of policy will have a negative impact on companies that provide mobile ad targeting, including Google, Facebook, and Twitter. It may also affect apps like Spotify, Uber, and Lyft that invest heavily in user acquisition and depend on user data from their apps.
You can view what’s happening with respect to tracking as a struggle between Apple and Google.
On one side of the net is Apple. It has a very self-contained business model and has pursued it through good times and bad.
When you buy Apple, you tend to go the whole hog — Apple hardware on the desktop running the Mac OS and apps from the App Store. Your mobile phone is an iPhone running iOS with App Store apps and your tablet is an iPad. If you’re into digital watches it will likely be an Apple Watch.
Apple makes the hardware, nowadays even the chip gets a cut of most of the software and builds some of the apps itself. And, of course, it sells music, videos, podcasts, etc.
What it doesn’t care about is advertising revenue. Apple is an ad-free business and has no reason to care whether Google, Facebook, or any other advertising platform gets ad revenue from its devices or not. It is without an ax to grind. It cares about customer satisfaction, and thus its primary goal is to provide its users with bulletproof, but configurable privacy.
On the opposite side of the net, Google clearly wants to maximize its ad revenue. It is the last of the browser companies to prevent third-party cookies and it intends to do so in a way that does not damage its revenues.
But, when it comes to the mobile world it is poorly placed to dominate ad traffic on iOS devices. Right now, the iPhone has about half the cell phone market in the US, and Safari has more than 50% of the browser market on the iPhone. It also dominates browser usage on the iPad. Those Safari browsers have a simple setting to stop third-party cookies dead in their tracks.
Where the IDFA comes in is for placing ads in iOS apps. You probably didn’t know it but Google has an app called AdMob for placing ads in mobile apps. AdMob is installed in 1.5 million iOS apps of which, in total, there have been 375 billion downloads. Those ads generate revenue for the app maker, but now they only work if the user opts-in.
How many users do you think will want to opt-in for such ads? Perhaps none. Facebook plays the same game, by the way, but has less of the market. Its ad distribution app is installed on a whole host of iOS apps of which there have been billions of downloads.
You probably have some of those apps installed. Tim Cook’s point is that nobody asked for your permission to be an ad victim and yet those ad distribution apps are sitting there on your iPhone or iPad anyway. Well from here on in, permission will be required.
Let me explain my perspective on this. I don’t even like Apple’s solution, even though I think what they are doing is not exploitative.
At the birth of the Internet, cookies were an excellent idea that helped to maintain “session integrity”. They made the web work better. Since then, they have been bent badly out of shape and been used by the Internet giants to exploit anyone who ever lifted a mobile phone or touched a keyboard.
Any data stored that can enhance the technology and the user experience is welcome. Let’s not call such data cookies, let’s refer to it as “the performance data cache”. No-one should have any problem with technical innovators adding data to this cache if it improves your digital life.
Beyond that, there is no need whatsoever for cookies of any other kind. Let’s hope they sink into the dustbin of technology and never resurface.
It is crashingly obvious that any interaction between a person and a website should be completely device-independent. It is an interaction between a person, assisted by their stored personal data, and the website with all its capabilities, including its abilities to serve ads.
The user can give permission for the use of the data and the website can interact accordingly. Under these circumstances, the user can retain control and choose to allow the advertiser to examine all their personal data for the sake of targeting, especially if the advertiser is willing to reward the user for their time and data in watching its ads.
Kudos to those that facilitate the asking and granting of permission for use of data for the purpose of targeting. Permission does you one better and ensures that you are compensated for data shared. It’s the only fair and transparent solution. After all, it’s YOUR data.
Did you know there is a way you can spend your crypto like fiat currency without converting your coins?
Meet crypto credit cards that function like normal (traditional) payment cards with the only difference that you spend your digital assets instead of cash.
Early on, when digital assets were rather new, we didn’t have too many cryptocurrency credit cards to choose from. Fortunately, with the industry’s growth and the rising popularity of digital assets, there are plenty of great crypto credit and debit card solutions on the market.
In this article, we will explore what a crypto credit card is, how it works, and the best cryptocurrency debit card solutions to spend your coins.
Let’s dive in!
A crypto credit card is a payment card that allows the cardholder to spend his digital assets like they were cash.
By utilizing large, global traditional payment networks like Visa or MasterCard, you can use your cryptocurrency credit card to shop even in stores that don’t have dedicated crypto payment gateways.
Therefore, crypto credit cards bridge the gap between the digital asset space and the traditional world, providing a new use-case for cryptocurrencies.
Cardholders benefit from the ability to hold some cryptocurrency in their wallet while using the other part to pay their bills, buy coffee, or spend their crypto for other products and services.
Additionally, merchants without dedicated digital asset payment gateways benefit from the purchasing power of crypto enthusiasts who use their cryptocurrency debit cards in their stores.
How crypto credit cards work depends on the solution you choose.
Generally speaking, you send your digital assets to a dedicated cryptocurrency wallet (usually on the service provider’s platform) and load them on your card. Some crypto credit card solutions may require you to exchange digital assets into fiat currency to load them on your card.
Also, other service providers do not require their users to store cryptocurrency on dedicated wallets. So you are free to use whichever (compatible) wallet you prefer to load funds on your card.
After loading your crypto on your card, you are ready to make digital asset payments. Your crypto debit card will work as a traditional payment card. Therefore, you will be able to make all kinds of payments from paying your rent and utility bills to buying beer or your favorite latte while you are on your way to work.
Unless the service provider requires you to convert your digital assets into fiat currency, the cryptocurrency on your card will be automatically exchanged into cash when you make a purchase.
Like prepaid cards, your crypto card will have different periodical limits (e.g., maximum balance, daily purchase, and monthly top-up limits).
Some of the crypto debit card solutions use universal limits for all their customers. Others utilize tiered systems where users in the higher levels have increased limits as well as access to premium features (e.g., airport lounge access, cashback rewards).
In exchange for a higher tier, users have to either pay a monthly subscription fee or stake cryptocurrency (lock up some coins for a specific time in their wallets).
In this section, we have collected the top five crypto debit card solutions.
Let’s see them!
Crypto.com’s MCO Visa Card is one of the most popular cryptocurrency credit cards on the market.
Formerly known as Monaco and later re-branding to Crypto.com, the Hong Kong-based company created a comprehensive cryptocurrency credit card solution after securing nearly $27 million in its token sale in June 2017.
What made Crypto.com’s MCO Visa Card popular is its crypto cashback rewards system, where users receive rebates in MCO tokens on their purchases.
In addition to the MCO Visa Card, Crypto.com features a rapidly growing ecosystem where users can store, exchange, and earn digital assets as well as use their coins as collateral to borrow funds on the platform.
The MCO Visa Card features competitive fees.
First, there is no card issuance fee. Also, you don’t have to pay a dime for maintaining your account.
While depositing crypto and exchanging it to other coins is free, Crypto.com charges a small fee for withdrawals. Also, if you use a credit or debit card to exchange fiat to crypto instantly, you will be charged a 3.5% fee.
Based on your account tier, you can withdraw a certain amount of cash in ATMs per month ($200 for the lowest level) for free. After you reach that limit, Crypto.com will charge a 2% fee for ATM withdrawals.
The same goes for interbank exchange limits, which will cost you 0.5% after reaching your monthly limits ($2,000 for the lowest tier).
The MCO Visa Card is available in the European Union, the UK, Canada, the United States, and multiple APAC countries.
The first reason why we like the MCO Visa Card is its widespread availability, which is among the best among crypto debit card solutions.
While Crypto.com uses a tiered system – where you have to stake MCO tokens for at least six months to access premium features as well as higher limits and more rewards –, you’ll get quite high limits as well as a 1% cashback rate with the basic card (Midnight Blue) that requires no staking.
In addition to the competitive fees on all levels, you have access to plenty of premium features – such as free Netflix, Spotify, and Amazon Prime subscriptions, bonus Airbnb and Expedia cashback, as well as airport lounge access – at higher account tiers.
Read our review on the MCO Visa Card for more information.
Coinbase, one of the most popular cryptocurrency exchanges, launched its crypto debit card solution in the EEA in 2019.
With support for nine coins – Bitcoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash, Ripple, Basic Attention Token, Augur, 0x, Stellar Lumens, and Litecoin – Coinbase cardholders can use their Coinbase Wallet balance to fund their cards directly with crypto.
Like the MCO Visa card, the Coinbase Card uses Visa’s network to offer its users worldwide coverage for cryptocurrency payments.
The company’s cryptocurrency exchange has been known for its user-friendly platform, not its low fees.
And the same can be said about the Coinbase Card. However, considering that you are using the cryptocurrency debit card of one of the most prominent companies in the industry, the Coinbase Card’s fees are more than reasonable. While there are no fees for account maintenance, Coinbase charges 4.95 EUR for card issuance.
Like with the MCO Card, you get a decent limit for free monthly ATM withdrawals with Coinbase (200 EUR). For domestic cash withdrawals, you have to pay a 1% fee, while it costs 2% to withdraw funds in an international ATM after you’ve reached your free limits.
In addition to some other fees – which you can take a look at here – Coinbase also charges your card for international transactions (3% for international and 0.20% for intra-EEA POS transfers).
Currently, the Coinbase Card is available in the EEA.
However, Coinbase will likely expand its crypto debit card service to additional markets (such as the United States).
The Coinbase Card comes from a trusted service provider with a great history in the cryptocurrency space. And, as mentioned before, the Coinbase Card’s fees are reasonable if you take the service provider’s reputation into account.
While you can hold nine cryptocurrencies on your Coinbase Card, it’s a good feature to load your card directly using your Coinbase Wallet.
Founded in 2014, the UK-based Wirex has been one of the oldest crypto debit card solutions on the market. In addition to the crypto debit card, Wirex has a mobile app where you have access to a built-in cryptocurrency exchange and wallet. You can fund the latter with both fiat currency and digital assets.
Similarly to the MCO Card, you get crypto cashback rewards (in BTC) on your Wirex Card purchases. The percentage of crypto rebates you receive on your transactions is based on how much Wirex Tokens (WXT) you hold.
Like Coinbase, the Wirex Visa Card features higher fees than some of its competitors (e.g., the MCO Visa Card). However, as Wirex has been operating its cryptocurrency card service since 2014, it is reasonable to assume that your funds are secure with the company.
While there are no fees for card issuance and delivery, Wirex charges 1.20 EUR per month for account maintenance. Also, Wirex charges a 3% foreign exchange fee for international transactions, which is added to both your non-domestic card purchases and ATM withdrawals.
The fixed fee is 2.25 EUR for domestic and 2.75 EUR for international ATM cash withdrawals.
Initially, the Wirex card was only available in the EEA. However, the company has recently expanded its services to countries in other regions (such as the APAC).
You can find more information about the crypto debit card’s availability on Wirex’s website.
Wirex has been a trusted crypto debit card service provider with a great history of operation.
In addition to the credibility, you also get an up to 1.5% cash back rewards rate by holding a certain amount of the company’s tokens.
With an integrated crypto-to-fiat exchange, you can easily load both digital and traditional currency on your Wirex Card.
Formerly known as TokenCard, the Monolith Visa Debit Card is among the most exciting cryptocurrency credit card solutions.
In addition to a crypto debit card that uses Ethereum’s network for digital asset wallets, the Monolith Card provides access to the DeFi (decentralized finance) economy for its users.
Monolith is powered by the project’s native TKN token, an ERC-20 digital asset running on the Ethereum network. TKN holders can use the coin to get fee discounts when they top up their card as well as redeem their share from Community Contributions.
In addition to providing an affordable crypto credit card solution, Monolith is very transparent about its fees.
You can get a Monolith Card in two base currencies: EUR or GBP, which will be used to calculate some of your fees. There is no account maintenance, card issuance, or shipping charges with Monolith. For funding your card, Monolith charges a 1+1% fee. One of these fees is the Community Contribution fee – that goes to TKN holders who can withdraw their share anytime – while you pay the other for card top-ups.
However, if you top up your Monolith Visa Debit Card with TKN, the service provider will waive the Community Contribution fee. You can also eliminate the top-up fee if you choose to load your card with DAI.
Although, it’s important to note that no matter which option you choose, you have to pay a 1% fee for loading your card with funds.
While it’s free to exchange fiat to crypto and vice versa at Monolith, the company charges 1.75% on transactions that are not in your base fiat currency (EUR or GBP).
You have two free base currency ATM withdrawals in a month. After reaching your limits, domestic cash withdrawals will cost you 0.85 EUR while withdrawing funds from your Monolith Card has a fixed 2 EUR fee (1.5 EUR for GBP withdrawals).
The Monolith Visa Debit Card is available in all 31 countries of the EEA as well as in multiple Special Member State Territories.
The Monolith Visa Debit Card is nothing like the other crypto credit card solutions on the market.
In addition to the cost-efficient fees and high levels of transparency, you have exclusive ownership over your Monolith Ethereum wallet. You can track your spending in real-time for your Monolith Card in the service’s iOS or Android app.
As a great benefit, Monolith has a Decentralized Exchange (DEX) aggregator that you can use to swap tokens at the best rates on the market. In the near future, Monolith is planning to add support for WalletConnect to (optionally) integrate numerous DeFi solutions into user wallets.
Monolith also seeks to offer customers the opportunity to receive their salaries in DAI by integrating either a regular sort code and account number or a European IBAN into the app.
In June 2017, TenX collected a huge sum ($80 million) from its contributors during the company’s token sale. Later on, the project launched its crypto debit card solution, the TenX Visa Card, which has become one of the most popular services in the Asia Pacific region.
Interestingly, TenX also offers its cryptocurrency credit card as a virtual payment card that customers can use instantly upon approval.
While the TenX Card’s fees may seem much at first, it’s important to note that the company does not charge any foreign exchange fees. Therefore, we can safely say that the TenX Visa Card has quite reasonable fees.
The card issuance fee is 15 USD or 15 EUR for physical and 5 USD or 5 EUR for virtual crypto credit cards. After the first year (which is free), TenX will charge a $10 annual fee, which can be waived by spending at least $1,000 in a year.
TenX does not charge any fees for card shipping, deposits, or crypto withdrawals. However, for ATM cash withdrawals, TenX will charge 3.25 USD or 3 EUR per transaction.
Also, the service provider will charge a small spread when you convert fiat to crypto or vice versa.
Currently, the TenX Visa Card is available in APAC countries as well as in Austria and Germany.
However, the company will likely expand its services to additional countries in the near future.
Similarly to Monolith, we appreciate how TenX is transparent about its fees, which seem quite reasonable, considering that there are no foreign exchange charges for international transactions.
We also like that there is an option at TenX to get a virtual crypto debit card with your account that you can use instantly after your account is approved.
As an additional benefit, you have access to multiple security controls and spending features with the TenX Visa Card.
Now that you know the essentials about crypto debit cards, it’s time to show you how to get one.
Please note that the instructions here are general, and the service provider you choose may require different steps to get a crypto card.
First, you need to open an account at a crypto debit card provider.
Most service providers use dedicated wallets to load cryptocurrency on your card. Therefore, you will get a crypto wallet when you open an account at such services.
Important: When you receive a cryptocurrency wallet with your account, make sure to write down and store your wallet’s secret keys at a safe place. You can either keep them securely on your computer or print them and store the document at a physical location. No matter where you store them, you should have exclusive access to your private keys, and you should never share them with anyone.
As the company operates a payment service, it has to comply with different regulations.
Therefore, the next step is to submit Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) documents to verify your identity and residence. You may also need to answer some questions, such as the purpose of your account or the origin of your funds.
After submitting the documents, the cryptocurrency credit card provider will take some time to verify them.
Upon successful verification, the service provider will ship your crypto debit card to your address.
While some cryptocurrency credit card solutions will do this automatically, others – especially those that require users to stake coins to unlock premium features – may ask you to deposit digital assets to a specific wallet before shipping your card.
In case you have to stake crypto to receive your card – and unlock higher account tiers –, make sure that you know the exact requirements and potential risks.
When you have received your card, the next step is to activate it based on the service provider’s instructions.
Upon successful activation, send crypto to either a dedicated wallet or one that’s compatible with the cryptocurrency card solution you are using.
If you don’t have any digital assets, we recommend using a prominent cryptocurrency exchange to convert fiat to crypto, and sending those coins to your card wallet.
Crypto credit card solutions use two different processes here.
A part of cryptocurrency debit card services allows users to load digital assets directly to their cards. For these solutions, you have to use your coins to top up your card. Sometimes, it is enough to have your coins in the service provider’s dedicated wallet. In that case, they will be automatically loaded on your card.
For the other process, you have to convert some of your digital assets to the base fiat currency (usually EUR, USD, or GBP), and use those funds to top up your card.
Whatever the process, you are ready to use your crypto credit card after a successful top-up.
By allowing crypto enthusiasts to spend their digital assets directly from their wallets, cryptocurrency debit cards open up new opportunities for the industry.
Fortunately, as the industry is developing at a fast rate, we have access to numerous crypto credit card solutions that provide an excellent service to their customers.
From cashback rewards and premium features to access to the DeFi economy via the Ethereum blockchain, crypto debit cards empower the industry with new use-cases while providing numerous benefits to users.
However, earning crypto cashback with cryptocurrency debit card solutions is not the only way to stack sats.
Alternatively, you can check out Permission‘s next-generation blockchain-based advertising platform where you can earn ASK tokens for leveraging your data while engaging with your favorite brands and retailers.
Sounds great, huh?
“Dear Charlie, Both myself and some of my friends who are members of permission.io find your authentication procedures to be unnecessary and slow.”
I’m glad you asked about this. You are not the first to ask. You might be surprised at the number of times our executives, designers, and developers have met to discuss this issue. We would dearly love for everything to be simple and for members to have to do nothing more than provide a name, and an email address, and that would be it.
All I can say is that we have done what we can to make it as simple as it can be while at the same time being able to authenticate everyone who applies to sign up, so that we know they are genuine.
The point to note is this:
Whenever we release an exciting new feature or share some other notable news, we get a flurry of applications—thousands—from new users trying to sign up.
Scammers and Robots
We wish it wasn’t so, but among the throngs of interested users, there is always a population of scammers and bots that hope to trick us into rewarding them with ASK for fake activity. There are ways to detect who is genuine and who is not from their online behavior. Because of that, we defer the ability to distribute ASK until a member has proven that they are authentic. We try to make this as painless as possible.
The Revolution We are Leading
Permission.io is developing the ability for large numbers of individuals anywhere in the world to earn ASK in exchange for watching ads that they choose to view. We believe that the business model we are sharing here will revolutionize the digital ad market, making it far more efficient than it currently is.
ASK and the web software we have built enables all of this. And within our platform, we intend to guarantee that genuine individuals are watching ads, and also purchasing goods. That bots are excluded and that we have created a win-win ad market where everyone wins.
We achieve this by ensuring that every one of our members is genuine. We apply a similar standard to the advertisers that use the platform and the retailers that sell goods. We are creating an honest and transparent market.
We hope you understand this. This is why we take pains to authenticate everyone and every organization that has access to our platform.
Cryptocurrency debit cards are the next big thing in the digital asset space.
And this shouldn’t come as a surprise.
A crypto debit card bridges the gap between traditional finance and the crypto world by allowing users to spend their digital assets directly from their wallets. From all the cryptocurrency debit cards, Crypto.com’s MCO Visa Card is one of the hottest solutions to spend your coins.
Join us as we take a thorough look at the crypto debit card in this MCO Visa Card review.
Crypto.com’s MCO Visa Card is a cryptocurrency debit card that allows users to spend their coins directly from their wallets.
As a result, there is no need for cardholders to exchange coins into fiat currency and withdraw those funds to their bank accounts.
One of the main reasons why the MCO Visa Card is so popular among cryptocurrency enthusiasts is the cashback rewards system, where you can redeem up to 5% of your total transaction value in the company’s native MCO tokens.
Crypto.com offers different card tiers with unique benefits for each. To unlock higher levels, you have to stake – lock up a part of your coins in a wallet for a specific time – MCO tokens (more on this later).
Higher tiers do not only offer higher cashback rewards but other benefits as well, such as free Netflix, Spotify, and Amazon Prime subscriptions, as well as premium airport lounge access.
Formerly known as the Monaco Card, the MCO Visa Card is a part of Crypto.com’s ecosystem.
In June 2017, the Hong Kong-based company successfully launched an Initial Coin Offering (ICO), collecting nearly $27 million of funds from contributors.
Since then, the organization has successfully launched the MCO Visa Card in multiple countries, including the UK, the European Union, Canada, the United States, Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, Thailand, the Philippines, Vietnam, Australia, and New Zealand.
In addition to the digital asset debit card, users of the MCO credit card also have access to the wide variety of products in the Crypto.com ecosystem, including a(n):
The MCO Visa Card works very similarly to other cryptocurrency debit cards.
You register for an account at the service and submit Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti Money-Laundering (AML) documents to the provider to confirm your identity and residential address.
After your account is verified, you should choose the tier of your MCO Visa Card.
If you choose the basic tier (Midnight Blue), you don’t have to stake any coins for your crypto card to be shipped to you.
However, if you choose a higher tier, you have to buy the required amount of MCO tokens, send them to your Crypto.com MCO wallet, where you have to hold them for at least six months.
While you are required to stake coins to access higher tiers, you don’t have to wait six months to get your card as you will be able to order it from Crypto.com as soon as you lock up the required amount of coins in your MCO wallet.
After ordering your card, Crypto.com will ship your card to your address, which you have to activate upon receiving it.
When you are done with that, the next step is to top up your MCO Visa Card with funds (either crypto or fiat currency).
Now that you have your funds ready, you can start using your MCO Visa Card to spend your crypto and earn cashback rewards.
Despite the fact that your MCO Visa Card is a cryptocurrency debit card, it will work very similarly to a traditional payment card.
The only exception is that you are spending crypto assets instead of fiat currency (unless you have already converted your funds to the latter).
As the MCO Card uses Visa’s global network, you will be able to use it in most countries and millions of stores worldwide.
The rewards you get for your MCO Visa Card is determined by your card tier.
While the basic tier (Midnight Blue) is free, you have to stake a specified amount of MCO tokens for at least six months – for example, 50 MCO for the second tier (Ruby Steel) – to access higher card tiers and better rewards.
Unlike at some competitor solutions, you also get cashback rewards with the basic Midnight Blue tier (1%).
However, if you stake MCO tokens, you can get an up to 5% cashback in MCO tokens on your card transactions.
In addition to the above-mentioned cashback rate, you get the following benefits for the highest MCO Card tier (Obsidian):
For more information on MCO Visa Card rewards, we recommend visiting Crypto.com’s website.
You can top up your MCO Visa Card easily within your Crypto.com wallet using the “Top Up” menu under the “Card” section inside the app.
Based on where you are located, Crypto.com offers multiple payment methods you can use to load your MCO Visa Card with funds.
For example, in the United States, you can top up your MCO Visa Card with the following cryptocurrencies:
US customers can top up their MCO Card with fiat currency (USD) via a credit card or bank transfers.
On the other hand, in addition to card top-ups, EU customers have access to low-cost SEPA bank transfers to fund their MCO Visa Card.
Compared to other crypto debit card solutions, the MCO Visa Card features competitive fees.
You don’t have to pay a dime for card issuance while account and card maintenance are also free.
Furthermore, crypto-to-crypto exchanges, internal transfers (to other Crypto.com users), as well as SEPA withdrawals and bank transfer deposits come at no cost.
Until you reach your limits – which are very generous for even the basic Midnight Blue tier ($200 for ATM withdrawals and $2,000 for interbank exchanges) – you don’t have to pay for ATM cash withdrawals and currency conversions.
However, after your monthly limits are reached, Crypto.com charges 2% for ATM withdrawals and 0.5% for interbank exchanges.
Also, there is an inactivity fee where you have to pay approximately $5 after being inactive for 12 months.
While instant fiat-to-crypto exchanges (via credit cards) will cost you 3.5% per transaction, Crypto.com will charge $50 for card re-issuances and upgrades, as well as for account closures.
For more information on the MCO Visa Card’s fees, we recommend checking the “Fees & Limits” menu inside “Settings” in the Crypto.com smartphone app.
The MCO Visa Card is indeed one of the best crypto credit cards on the market.
In addition to the competitive fees, the Monaco Visa Card offers excellent cashback rewards and access to premium features and benefits at higher tiers.
Even at the lowest Midnight Blue tier, you get 1% cashback on all your card transactions, which is highly competitive among crypto debit cards.
With the high limits for free ATM withdrawals and interbank exchanges, as well as access to other products in Crypto.com’s ecosystem, the MCO Visa Card could be a great choice for cryptocurrency enthusiasts in the EU, UK, US, Canada, and APAC countries.
“Dear Charlie, How does Permission help its members to own their data?”
The best way to explain this is to think of Permission.io as a platform for applications that enable its members to own their data and monetize it, should they wish to do so.
Our primary activity on behalf of our members is that we have created a digital advertising platform where advertisers can reward our members for watching ads and interacting with branded content. Members enter the platform by signing up and are immediately compensated for creating a wallet to be used on Permission.io and further into 3rd party applications.
Members can earn in a multitude of ways. They opt-in to register their interests, demographic, and other key data, and embark on various shopping journeys. For ongoing sharing of data and for granting permission to receive invited ads that address their desire to learn and buy, members are rewarded with ASK. Members can HODL, exchange, or spend ASK on the platform and/or on 3rd-party sites that accept ASK.
A core aspect of the current member experience is watching video ads. Members earn for engaging with videos ranging in duration and format, including shorter, gamified ads, opt-in value exchange video ads, and brand films. Users will be able to directly monetize their data collected while engaging with video content, unlike typical platforms that sell their information to third parties.
Over time, the platform will feature other opportunities for members to earn from their data while interacting with news, surveys, video games, premium content, and more.
By rewarding members for their profile and behavioral data, advertisers will be able to more accurately be able to provide members with personal, relevant ads. This means that the Permission platform will present members with ads that they will likely enjoy watching… and they’ll get paid for it.
In regards to data ownership, that is the point from where we start.
We have a project in progress at the moment which is code-named PermissionQE. The goal of this project is to build a query engine using our data algebra approach to data manipulation and management.
The QE stands for Query Engine, which is what the software we are building does. It can query large volumes of data, including, of course, member profile data.
If you are wondering where the member profile data will come from, the interesting thing is that most of this data already exists and is stored on a wide variety of websites, such as Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, and many other sites that store personal data. The primary objective of PermissionQE is to enable users to access, integrate, and monetize their data. Our technology makes this possible and is helped by the obligation of such sites to make the data available to its owners ever since the GDPR legislation in the EU.
We will be able to help our members gather their personal data together. This will include data that is permissioned on our platform together with data stored in third-party databases. Our members’ full dataset will then be available for members to monetize and for advertisers to target accurately.
Such an arrangement is the beginning of our members being able to access, manage, and control their personal data. The thing to note is that while Permission.io will pursue its advertising and sales business model with a maximum of energy, it is also our intention to encourage developers to create new applications that can assist our members in monetizing their data.
The more apps we build, the larger the amount of personal data we will make available to the average member. If we can encourage an energetic developer community, and we intend to, we expect that many other apps will be created that will help our members put their personal data to productive use.
What if you could get paid while relaxing and watching movies? Settle into the couch with a bit of popcorn and come out with a few extra bucks?
Well, while you won’t make a career doing it, it turns out that dream is possible. There are services based online and in-person around the country that pay people to watch movies. Sometimes these opportunities are officially through movie theater companies, other times they are through separate services like movie trailer review sites or loyalty programs, but you have options.
As you would expect in a “get money for doing nothing” style space, there’s a lot of noise and bad faith players. You have to be careful about whom you choose to work with and why. To make this a bit easier for you, we’ve done our research and found a handful of legitimate ways you can get paid to watch movies.
These fall into two major camps: passive and active. Neither option will make you rich, but as you’d expect, you can make more by choosing “active” services. This means you have to exert some sort of effort, whether that’s proactively choosing the videos they serve up to you or by going to physical locations, etc. Passive services are usually data collection panels that simply observe what you already do.
So take a look, see which options look most interesting to you, and get watching!
This isn’t as big as it used to be, especially in the wake of COVID-19, but you could look into becoming a “Field Associate” via CertifiedFieldAssociate.com or through the movie companies themselves.
These companies pay you to sit in on movies in local theatres to make sure ads are being run, count customers, figure out what movies are most popular and when, etc.
It’s essentially a hands-on data collection position. The main issue with this gig is that you can waste a lot of time and get paid much less than minimum wage. This is because depending on your task, you may have to wait for a movie to finish or run into issues with the local theatre management, etc.
Lots of people who have done these types of gigs for a while only recommend taking gigs with a defined scope.
By either signing up directly with movie companies or through third-party sites, you can get paid a lump sum for attending movies at movie theaters and answering specific questions related to your experience.
The pay varies from job to job, but they usually pay a project fee. This means if you’re not careful about time management, you can earn less than minimum wage.
There’s a whole internet culture around getting paid for surveys, small tasks, playing games, etc. Many of the large communities in this world also offer points and gift card opportunities for watching movie trailers or giving feedback on ads. This is definitely more of an “active” choice, but if you’re interested in making money online in your downtime, then the sites listed below are reliable places to start.
Popular “make money online” sites like Swagbucks and InboxDollars pay you in points to perform all sorts of online activities from playing games to watching movie trailers. You can then turn those points in for gift cards or cash.
You won’t make more than a few bucks a month, so it’s best to do this in your downtime or only when high point opportunities come around.
This is more on the active side, but if you have a passion for movies, then you could start reviewing movies you watch and submitting your writing to publications. Some of these will be paid, most won’t be. You could also start a YouTube channel and post your reviews there. There’s no sure path to becoming a paid critic, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try.
Your best bet is to find a different spin on what’s already being done. Look at the market and current popular movie reviewers and see how you can do something a bit different. Once you identify an opportunity, make a content plan, run a few tests, and ask your friends for their opinions before investing too much time.
This is a creative pursuit that has no guarantee of success and requires passion. You will most likely start by writing your own reviews and refining your craft and eventually pursuing publications to work with. You could also create your own platform and publish there.
Most people don’t make anything, but successful critics can make a decent living doing a job they love. Like any creative pursuit, this will take a lot of time and effort before you reap any sort of monetary reward.
This is getting at it from a different angle, but you could look into product testing for TV companies. They want to make sure their new products work and are user-friendly, so there are ways to get paid for answering questions about new products.
People can apply to studies through third-party sites (a few are listed below). If you qualify for a study, you’ll either be sent a TV or a product related to a TV that you’ll have to report back on.
Payment varies from study to study, but you can usually make between $10-$25 an hour when you’re participating.
These opportunities are rare and have a ton of competition, but there are editorial/movie analyst positions that Netflix, Hulu, HBO, etc. have where people tag shows and improve their service’s metadata (the data that the algorithm uses to know what to display).
You have to get officially hired through a particular movie company like Netflix. This means browsing job sites, sending in resumes — the whole nine yards.
That depends on what is involved in your position, but these can be full-time positions at large companies, meaning you could make a liveable salary.
This is the most passive option to make money while watching movies because you don’t have to change your habits at all. Major data collection and reporting companies like Nielsen will pay you to have access to your phone and computer. You can make an easy $50 a year and be entered into automatic sweepstakes depending on the panel, but the most popular and reputable company by far is Nielsen.
These companies turn this data into massive industry reports that businesses use to educate their strategies. Yes, you are giving up your privacy here, but you are also getting compensated for using your phone and computer like normal.
You download a piece of software, fill out an account, give the software a bunch of permissions, and voila.
If you’re selling via a single panel, not very much. Nielsen gives you around $50 a year and enters you into sweepstakes that could pay off but aren’t worth banking on.
Consider expanding your definition a bit and look for jobs that let you watch TV while you do them.
Babysitting comes immediately to mind. You could also consider house sitting, dog sitting, working at a parking garage, or finding some other position that is generally “slow”. Not only will these pay you more, but you’ll probably enjoy them more because you can watch what you choose instead of being forced to watch specific content.
You won’t make much money simply watching TV or videos. Every option here has one thing in common: you have to provide value to the person paying you. It’s obvious, but it’s true. The less work involved, the less value you are typically providing. The more hands-on, the more you get paid. That’s how the game works.
Our advice is to use apps sites like Swagbucks alongside more lucrative product testing opportunities. In other words, mix your passive and active opportunities to keep things fresh and earn the most cash.
Good luck, and remember to make these services work for you and not the other way around. If you feel stretched and pressed for time, it’s almost certainly not worth it. You should approach these with a casual mindset and put your efforts toward other job opportunities if you are particularly strapped for cash.
Permission is working to get people just like you paid for the data you’re already giving away. We are creating a new kind of internet that pays you for your time and data shared while engaging online as you normally do. The Permission Browser Extension suggests cool ads relevant to your internet browsing, and pays you cryptocurrency in return for watching.
See how we’re working to change the internet forever.
Fiat currency is government-issued and government-backed legal tender which is not linked to the value of anything physical like gold, silver, or even copper.
Perhaps you’d like to call it: I-can’t-believe-it’s-actually-money, money.
If you read The Bible in Latin—I bet you don’t—on the first page in the third verse of Genesis, you run across the words “fiat lux,” meaning “let there be light.” Armed with this information you can deduce that the term “fiat currency” literally means “let there be currency.”
This widely-used term first saw the light of day in the book, “Fiat Money Inflation in France” published in 1875. It was an academic work written by Andrew Dickson White, the American historian, and co-founder of Cornell University.
At the time the book was written, there was a running debate about the nature of money. Andrew White chose the words “fiat currency” to describe money which has no intrinsic value. If you’ve never studied the subject, you’ll be surprised by how many different things that have value of themselves have been used as money at various times. Of course, it’s true of gold and silver coins, but it’s also true of beaver pelts (used as currency in New France, now part of Canada) and cigarettes (used as currency for over two years in post-WW2 Germany).
Surprisingly, cowry shells proved popular for many centuries. They were used as currency in ancient China, so much so that Classical Chinese character for “money/currency”, 貝, is believed to be a pictograph of a cowrie shell. And because cowries occur near the shores of almost all countries that border the Indian ocean, they were used as money in India and African countries that border that ocean.
So, something qualifies as real money if it has “intrinsic” value—beaver pelts, cigarettes, and cowries were regarded as valuable by the peoples who accepted them as money, just as gold and silver were.
The Chinese invented paper money, some time in the Tang Dynasty (618-907 AD), and used engraved wooden blocks to print it. They gradually became increasingly sophisticated in financial activities, developing credit mechanisms—merchants began to use promissory notes (credit notes) for long-distance trade. During the Song Dynasty (960-1276) merchants were invited to deposit their coins with the Government Treasury in exchange for “flying money” (Fey-thsian).
Curiously, the motivation for flying money wasn’t a desire to inflate the money supply. It was done because China was running out of coins. This is a money-supply problem we rarely hear of now, but it often plagued coin-based economies. Some merchants issued private drafts (banknotes in effect) that were backed by coins and salt, and later on by gold and silver. In 1024, the government took sole control of issuing these notes.
Then, during the Yuan Dynasty (1279-1367), paper money was declared to be the only legal tender. The paper money experiment began to go badly wrong during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644). New notes were introduced into circulation without withdrawing older notes. Monetary inflation followed, as naturally as night follows day. In 1380, one Chinese guan was worth 1000 copper coins, by 1535, its value had reduced to 0.28 copper coins.
It is worth pointing out here that the word “inflation” in a financial context is often misunderstood by people to mean “rising prices.” That is not its meaning. It means precisely “an increase in the supply of money.” Rising prices are a possible, but not guaranteed, result of inflating the money supply.
If you increase the supply of money, but that new money ends up with people who choose never to spend it, it will not cause prices to rise. Prices will rise only if the money circulates. And prices can rise for other reasons—a poor harvest will raise the price of grain without any help from an inflated money supply.
Europe lagged China by centuries in the use of paper money, which didn’t get going until the printing press had been invented. The idea was tried in Sweden in 1661 by Stockholm’s Banco, linking banknotes directly to deposits of coins. The bank then foolishly printed more notes than there were deposits. It went bankrupt after three years. At about the same time, the goldsmith-bankers in London began creating notes linked to deposits, but they were conservative in issuing them. These proved to be a prototype for a national currency.
In 1694 the English government established the Bank of England, printing notes that guaranteed access to an amount of silver. But it wasn’t until 1745 that it issued fixed denomination notes from £20 to £1,000—the first true British banknotes.
While London moved slowly, Paris moved quickly, under the influence of the Scottish economist, John Law. He was an original economic thinker and a historically influential one. He invented the scarcity theory of value—a model for the interaction between supply and demand. He wrote the Real Bills Doctrine, which considers the required relationship between bank assets and liabilities and which set the foundation for modern banking. He believed that monetary inflation would stimulate an economy—and it does in the short term. But that opinion led to his downfall.
Law was also a successful gambler with a good understanding of probability. It was his gambling skills that brought him to the attention of the French aristocracy and his economic ideas that persuaded the Duke of Orleans to appoint him as Controller General of Finances of France.
When John Law took charge, France was in a financial mess. Louis XIV’s War of the Spanish Succession had left France in economic distress. The economy was stagnant and the national debt was crippling. A shortage of precious metals caused a shortage of coins in circulation.
Law’s solution was to replace gold with paper credit and then gradually increase the supply of credit. He believed this would stimulate commerce, and thus help to reduce the national debt. He intended to replace the national debt with shares in prosperous economic ventures.
To cut a long story short, Law issued bank notes based on gold coins combined in a 1 to 3 ratio with defunct government bonds, inflating the currency by a factor of 3 from the get-go. He then provoked a speculative bubble by founding the Mississippi Company, a monopoly trading company. The company’s stock rose by 60 times its initial value and then collapsed causing French citizens to dump their paper money for coins. When that happened, he was shown the door.
By the nineteenth century, the phenomenon of paper money inflation was better understood. John Law’s disastrous French experiment proved to be an object lesson and a highly effective deterrent. The faith in coinage (gold and silver) was even enshrined in the US constitution, where Article 1, Section 10 states:
“[No State shall] make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;”
From 1837 to 1863, a period of 26 years, the US had no central banks, just heavily regulated state-chartered banks that issued banknotes against specie (precious-metal-based coinage). Then, with the National Banking Act of 1863, a system of national banks was established with the intent of creating a uniform national currency and paying for the Union’s civil war costs.
Wars are costly. The US issued “Greenback” dollars that were not backed by precious metals to pay for it. But in a series of legislative changes, which began in 1873, the US gradually moved to a gold standard with all bank notes backed by gold.
The British had been operating a gold standard since 1844, and much of the British Empire naturally fell in line. In 1873, Germany adopted the gold standard and France followed suit. Throughout the 19th-century, banknotes backed by gold gradually superseded gold and silver coinage.
A gold standard emerged. It prevented undisciplined and inflationary money-printing and it reduced the need for coins. It also enforced a fixed exchange rate between currencies, facilitating global trade. Because currency was exchangeable for gold, gold naturally migrated to the more successful economies, increasing the money supply in accordance with the national balance of trade.
What’s not to love?
Gold does not provide a perfect basis for a commodity-backed currency, but, historically, it has proved to be the best choice. Currently, the world’s above-ground gold stock grows by 1 to 2% annually. About half the gold in existence is used for jewelry, about 20% is owned by central banks, a further 20% by private investors, and the remainder is employed industrially. The neat thing about gold is that it isn’t destroyed by usage; almost all industrially used gold is recovered and recycled.
The glitches in gold-based currencies happen with discoveries of significant new deposits. But this is rare. It happened when Spain raided the Aztecs and the Incas for gold, and as a result of the California gold rush of 1849, the Australian gold rush of 1851, and the Witwatersrand gold rush of 1886. It would require a truly dramatic new gold find to increase the existing stock of gold significantly.
There are currently about 190,000 tonnes of mined gold, with an estimated 54,000 tonnes still below ground. Most of those 190,000 tonnes are more recent than you might imagine. Two-thirds of it has been mined since 1950.
The question is: why did the gold standard fail?
But it’s the wrong question. The gold standard didn’t fail; it worked. The intention with the gold standard was to prevent the debasement of paper currency by making it exchangeable with something that couldn’t be debased: gold. All the evidence suggests that it works, even allowing for the disruption imposed by the occasional major gold discovery.
Paper money that is linked directly to gold—something that cannot be inflated by fiat, is not fiat money. Paper money becomes fiat money when the link between the paper and the gold is cut.
In the first decade of the twentieth century, the major economies of the world had moved their currencies to implement a gold standard. Then came the wars – without money, you cannot fight them. And the easiest way to pay for them is in fiat money because you can print it without it becoming immediately obvious to your citizens. The economists could not object—losing the war will be far worse economically than a dose of inflation.
After World War I, only the US truly remained on the gold standard. Other countries tried to go back to it, but the Great Depression foiled that.
In 1934, the US Congress passed the Gold Reserve Act, which nationalized all gold by ordering Federal Reserve banks to turn over their physical gold to the U.S. Treasury. In return, the banks received gold certificates to be used as reserves against deposits and Federal Reserve notes. The act authorized the president to devalue the gold-linked dollar, which he quickly did. This bumped the gold value of the dollar from $20.67 to $35 per ounce, a devaluation of over 40%.
The effect was to allow the Federal Reserve to print money in the hope of combatting rampant deflation. That’s right, deflation rather than inflation!!
The money supply can expand as well as contract. If paper money is printed and it circulates, then in general prices will rise. However, when an economy goes into recession or a depression, many people and businesses are no longer able to pay their debts. An unpaid debt is money that disappears. The usual way to combat such a contraction of the money supply is to print money and make it available to the banks so that they remain solvent.
This is the other side of the coin, as regards fiat money. Not only does fiat money make inflation possible, it also makes deflation possible. Neither of those is good for the health of an economy.
At the end of World War II, another very expensive war, which only the US survived with its economy intact, a new international standard for currencies was implemented, that went by the name of Bretton Woods.
The idea was that countries would fix their exchange rate against the US dollar and would be able to exchange their dollar holdings for gold at the official exchange rate of $35 per ounce whenever they so wished. Neither businesses nor individuals were allowed to do that, so convertibility was highly constrained. Depriving individuals of owning gold (except for jewelry) removed a great deal of liquidity from the market and thus helped to stabilize the dollar price of gold.
So the US dollar then became the world’s primary reserve currency—the currency that countries and large businesses needed to hold to conduct international trade. They held dollars for the same reason that people and companies once held gold coins: as a common currency. The dollar was suitable because of its link to gold, and all countries could swap their dollar holdings for gold whenever they wished.
This worked very well until it didn’t.
Starting in 1959 and continuing for over a decade, France decided to continuously exchange its dollar reserves for gold at the official rate. In the latter part of the 1960s, the US was spending heavily on the Vietnam War and was running a persistent balance of payments deficit. Eventually, the US was obliged to cut the deficits or cut the link to gold.
President Nixon chose the latter—on August 15, 1971, the US abandoned the convertibility of the US dollar to gold.
It is a remarkable fact that for the last 50 years no currencies in the world have had any intrinsic value. They are nothing more than paper, no matter which country you live in. And few people care.
The only thing that is backing the US dollar is faith that the US government will support it and maintain the current system of currency exchange across the markets of the world. However, this system favors the US. It remains to be seen whether the dominance of the dollar will be challenged.
Why, cryptocurrencies, of course. Currencies that can be designed to be proof against the twin systemic threats of inflation and deflation.
Between work, families, and what little time we have to give ourselves to relax, finding ways to squeeze in some extra cash can be a challenge. Part-time gigs aren’t always feasible, and people need ways to make extra cash both on-demand and passively.
Getting paid for searching the web is a good example of passive income. You won’t make a lot of money doing this, but by opting into a collection of services that pay you for actions you’re already doing, you can build up a nice pocket of cash to pay down debt, pad your Christmas shopping stash, or use as a savings buffer.
Before we dive into our favorite search engine reward programs, we’re going to cover a few important questions and thoughts about this world:
Getting paid to search the web or getting paid for browsing the internet is exactly what it sounds like. You use your preferred or specific search engines, and depending on the actions you take and the keywords you search, you can earn money or points for those actions.
That depends on the platform, but typically brands pay these companies to suggest actions for you to take, observe your behavior to sell to advertisers, or both.
For example, one platform is Qwee. Let’s say you were in a shopping mood and searched for “new toaster”. If you had the Qwee extension installed, not only would you see the normal search engine results, you would also see a list of vendor links with numeric cashback values listed. If you click one of those Qwee links, let’s say one that goes to Target to check out their toaster collection, then you would receive some cash for clicking to that site, and Qwee would too.
Because the earning potential is low across the board, the best search engine reward programs are the ones you will use with the least amount of effort. In other words, you’re aiming for the platforms that either already fit into your habits or can be easily added to your routine.
Next, you’re looking for platforms that aren’t overly restrictive, and that give you meaningful progress. If the actions to qualify for points or cash back are limited, then it will be difficult to engage in these actions passively. And, if you’re looking for something you can do to make active money, then paid surveys or more professional side gigs are a better way to spend your time.
Lastly, you want to have reliable progress. If it feels more like a distraction and cash doesn’t seem to be accruing on a reliable basis, then you should change platforms.
There are also some clever ways to combine some of these passive earners to maximize your cash. We cover those below!
Without further ado, here are our favorite programs to make money by searching Google or using search engines. Have a specific suggestion or experience with the options below? Let us know.
Swagbucks is a powerhouse free reward system backed by Yahoo and offers a diverse set of ways to earn online, including web searching, videos, surveys, and opting into paid offers with cash kickbacks.
Swagbucks operates on a points system. Once you create an account, you have a variety of different passive and active activities you can opt into to earn points. Once you earn enough, you can “cash-out” by either choosing gift cards or a PayPal cashout.
Swagbucks is widely variable, from $10-$20 with a pretty hands-off approach to reports of $300-$400/month. Your best bet for maximizing income is to make the Swagbucks browser your default browser, use the paid and discovery offers when you can, base your activities around the daily and monthly bonuses, and take the daily polls.
In the end, it really depends on how much time you put in and what offers come through that month, but you shouldn’t expect to make more than a small amount per month.
Sign up for Swagbucks here.
Qmee is a survey and browser extension company that gives cash rewards for clicking into relevant sites based on what you search for.
After you create a free account, you download their browser extension and can continue using your favorite browsers like Chrome. If you search a keyword that a Qmee brand partner has bid for, then a pop-up shows up on the left side of your browser, giving you the option to earn money by clicking into the brand’s site.
Qmee pays anywhere from a few cents to a dollar for clicking into certain links related to your search query, and surveys vary from a few cents to a few dollars.
Sign up for Qmee here.
Previously known as Bing Rewards, Microsoft Rewards is an all-in-one, cross-platform rewards program based around Microsoft Products. From Bing to Xbox, to shopping at their online store, it all funnels into one reward account.
After you sign up for a free account, you can register all of your Microsoft devices. Level 1 Members start by earning up to 150 points per month from searches, and Level 2 Members earn up to 20 points a day and 600 a month from searches. The more points you earn, the higher levels, and the more perks you get.
You can earn points by searching, completing quizzes, playing certain games and completing actions on Xbox, buying from their online store, and more.
Once you have enough points, you can redeem them for sweepstakes or Microsoft products.
This platform is best for Microsoft power users. About 1,000 points are worth a dollar, and with search only you’re restricted to 150 points per month on Level 1 and 600 for level 2, resulting in <$1/month from search alone. If you combine your rewards account with Microsoft purchases and complete the occasional quiz, then it becomes a bit more lucrative!
Pro Tip: Combine Qmee with Microsoft Rewards to double your earning potential.
You can sign up for Microsoft Rewards by clicking here.
Nielsen Digital Voice is a passive application that pays you to record your behavior and uses that data to educate their research and trends reports.
First, you download their program on your computer. After it installs, you’ll run through a series of steps before getting the all-clear. Once everything is set up, you don’t have to do anything else! You will automatically be entered into their sweepstakes.
All of Nielsen Digital Voice rewards are sweepstakes-based, so your rewards will vary. They give away $120,000 a year, and each month 400 members are winners from a pool of $10,000. Your winning amount is random but will never exceed $1,000 in a month.
Sign up for Nielsen Digital Voice here.
Wonder is a research-based platform where companies ask anonymous questions and Wonder researchers deliver detailed responses. Rather than being a passive search app, this offers higher pay for active research. If you’re looking for something a bit more hands-on, then this is for you.
The barrier of entry is much higher for researchers on Wonder, but if you pass, then you join the platform, choose the questions you’d like to answer, and get paid based on the values listed next to the questions.
Between $8-$35 an hour, but that depends on your proficiency and the questions available. Wonder is best for people adept at internet research — the ability to find legitimate sources and pull useful information from them is critical to making money on Wonder.
Sign up for Wonder here.
That depends on you.
To be clear: getting paid to browse the internet is not a complete way to make a living.
But, if you can build these services into your lifestyle in a way that doesn’t subtract and only adds to your earning potential and you aren’t concerned with privacy and selling your data, then yes; they can be a good way to pad your bank account. The keys to achieving that are following the guidelines we listed above: making sure you fit them into your routine, stacking them when possible, etc.
The idea is to make them work for you and not the other way around.
As you can tell, the best way to get paid for searching the web is by using apps and services that work with your existing routine, but what if those services and routines didn’t have to be separate at all?
What if people could take back ownership of their data and only interact with brands when they choose to, earning passive income by permissioning their data to brands and engaging with personalized content, instead of being interrupted by annoying and bad-fitting ads or having to use specific search engines?
What if instead of search engines and eCommerce giants profiting from your data, financial value for your information was transferred back to you?
That future is possible with current blockchain and digital ID technology, and we’re building it. The Permission Browser Extension offers users cryptocurrency in return for their data. When users download the extension, they’re shown relevant ads as they browse the web, which they can choose to watch in return for crypto. With technology like this, why would you ever watch ads without being paid?
See how Permission is handing data ownership back to where it rightly belongs… in the hands of individuals.
Control over our data has become increasingly important.
With multiple recent high-profile data breaches and scandals, governments are taking extra measures to prevent their citizens’ personal information from falling into the wrong hands.
Data sovereignty, which has become a hot topic nowadays, is one of the concepts governments are using to protect citizens’ data.
But what is data sovereignty, why is it important, and how does it affect businesses and consumers?
Bear with us as we explore this important topic.
Data sovereignty refers to the concept that the data an organization collects, stores, and processes is subject to the nation’s laws and general best practices where it is physically located.
In layman’s terms, this means that a business has to store the personal information of its customers in a way that complies with all the data privacy regulations, best practices, and guidelines of the host country.
If the business fails or refuses to comply with the host’s data privacy laws, the country’s government can impose a fine or force the company in another way to fulfill its requirements.
As part of data sovereignty measures, multiple countries have regulated how businesses can handle citizens’ data, including the locations and jurisdictions where organizations are allowed to store citizen data.
When a business transfers data of a citizen outside of the country, the third nation’s government can use measures (e.g., subpoenas) to access the user’s data, even though the citizen is a foreign national.
Since governments seek to prevent other nations from acquiring the data of their citizens, they have introduced data sovereignty measures that restrict how businesses can transfer personal information outside of the country.
Furthermore, the recent data protection law of the European Union, the GDPR, has implemented strict rules on how organizations handle the personal information of their citizens, even when the company processes data outside the region.
As a side note, data sovereignty is sometimes used in the context of indigenous societies.
Indigenous data sovereignty refers to the decolonization of the personal information of indigenous people that could play a key role in achieving autonomy for these societies.
While data sovereignty and data residency are two terms that have similar meanings, it’s very easy to confuse them.
Data residency is when a business or government specifies the geographical location where its data should be stored.
Data residency requirements are often the result of policy- or regulation-related reasons.
Let’s see an example to understand this.
A nation has favorable data privacy laws that help enterprises in handling data-related processes in a convenient, predictable way.
Due to the favorable regulatory environment, businesses would choose this country to store their data.
A company may also include the location where its users’ personal information is kept in its data sovereignty policy.
An excellent example of a regulation-related data residency requirement is when a business chooses to store the data in a specific country due to its favorable tax environment.
To receive the tax benefits, the business needs to ensure that it does most of its operations within the nation’s borders. Therefore, it decides to store its data in a geographical location somewhere in the country.
On the other hand, data sovereignty refers to designating the geographical location where the data is physically stored AND being the subject of that nation’s laws.
While data residency ensures that the data stays in the specified geographical location, data sovereignty makes sure that the information is subject to the legal punishments and protections of the country where it is physically stored.
To understand our topic, it’s essential to take a look at the most important events leading to data sovereignty’s rising popularity.
Many credit the popularity of data sovereignty and the rise of related discussions to Edward Snowden’s leaks that exposed the US National Security Agency’s (NSA) PRISM spying program.
As part of the program, the US agency was collecting sensitive personal information – including photos, emails, social media login credentials, video calls, and other data – from tech companies in the United States (e.g., Facebook, Apple, Google, and Twitter).
The problem with the spying program was that the NSA did not only collect the sensitive personal information of US citizens but also from foreign nationals.
In addition to the NSA’s spying program, as per the US Patriot Act, the American government has the authority to access data that is physically stored within the country, regardless of its origins.This means that, for example, German citizens’ data are exposed to the US government if the information is physically stored within the North American country.
Amid concerns that their citizens’ data could fall into the hands of a foreign government, nations all over the world have introduced data sovereignty measures.
Microsoft’s case against the US Department of Justice (DoJ) was also a high-profile event that further highlighted the importance of data sovereignty.
After the DoJ ordered the tech company to grant access to emails stored in Ireland-based servers related to a narcotics investigation in 2013, Microsoft had refused to comply with the Department of Justice’s request.
Despite that Microsoft stated that complying with the request would break the data privacy laws of the European Union, the initial ruling ordered the company to fulfill the DoJ’s request.
However, later on, after Microsoft won the appeal and the DoJ changed its data-related policies.
Let us show an example to understand why data sovereignty is crucial.
You open a bank account in the United States, where you regularly deposit your funds.
While you were of the belief that the financial institution would store your funds in the US, you get a call from the bank’s manager that your money has been moved to a third country as the regulatory environment is more beneficial there.
Later on, that nation’s government decides to close your bank’s local branch. For a reason, it confiscates all the funds that the bank’s customers held there, including yours.
Fortunately, due to the different financial regulations in place, the above-mentioned example could not happen with your money.
However, without laws that ensure adequate data sovereignty compliance, your personal information – which is as valuable as your money – could be as easily abused as your funds in the example.
Before data sovereignty and privacy were important, businesses could (more or less) use the personal information of their users as they liked.
This means that tech companies could sell your personal data without your consent to a third party for advertisement purposes.
A great example of the above-mentioned is Facebook’s scandal with Cambridge Analytica.
With an app called This Is Your Digital Life, Cambridge Analytica collected personal data from Facebook users who agreed to participate in surveys.
However, Facebook allowed the firm to collect the data of the survey takers’ friends on the social media platform, harvesting the data of millions of Facebook users without their consent, using the information predominantly for political advertising.
After the scandal was revealed in 2018 by a former Cambridge Analytica employee, the event sparked outrage among consumers and governments alike.
Furthermore, the infamous data leak emphasized the importance of data sovereignty, and governments all over the world have been turning an increased focus on this matter to protect their citizens against information leaks.
Now let’s take a look at some nations that already have data sovereignty laws in place.
Canada has 28 data privacy laws, which include federal, provincial, and territorial statutes.
Regarding Canada’s data sovereignty, we should mainly focus on the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) regulation.
Based on Canada’s data sovereignty laws, an organization remains responsible for the protection of the data it transfers to a third-party (even though the service provider is the one processing or handling the information).
Furthermore, Canadian businesses have to reference in their privacy policies and procedures whether they transfer data to third parties outside of the nation’s borders.
The Quebec Privacy Act is more strict with local organizations as they have to ensure that personal information transferred to third parties outside the state would be used only for the intended purposes of the company.
At the same time, the state’s data sovereignty regulation prevents service providers from transferring data to third parties without consent.
If an organization cannot ensure that the third-party service provider outside of Quebec has proper data protection measures, it must refuse the transfer.
It’s also important to mention the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), one of the most prominent data privacy laws in the United States.
After becoming effective on January 1, 2020, the CCPA introduced a set of privacy laws for organizations doing business in California that fit one of the following criteria:
As per the CCPA, organizations have to disclose the personal data they collect, the purpose of the collection, as well as the third parties they share the information with.
Consumers can demand the deletion of their data from businesses, and they are also able to opt out of their personal information being sold.
In the latter case, the CCPA prohibits organizations from raising the price or changing the level of the service for consumers who don’t want companies to sell their data. However, the data privacy law does allow businesses to offer financial incentives to their customers in exchange for data collection or the ability to sell their personal information.
Furthermore, if the CCPA’s privacy guidelines are violated by an organization, consumers can sue the company.
When California authorities discover a violation of the CCPA’s guidelines, businesses have 30 days to comply with the privacy laws after the regulator’s official notice.
If an organization fails to resolve its issues within that time frame, California regulators can impose a fine of up to $7,500 per record. As there is no upper limit for the fine, a business that processes the data of millions of consumers could pay billions for violating the CCPA.
Unlike the EU’s GDPR, the CCPA does not restrict international data transfers.
When it comes to data privacy laws, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is what comes to most people’s minds.
After its approval in 2016 by the EU Parliament, the GDPR requires all organizations – within and outside of the European Union – to comply with strict data privacy rules if and when they collect, process, or store the personal information of EU citizens.
We will discuss data sovereignty and GDPR more thoroughly later in this article.
Germany has been amongst the leaders of data privacy and protection.
Apart from the EU’s GDPR, the European country has implemented the new German Privacy Act (BDSG-new) that restricts data transfers to third countries.
According to Germany’s data sovereignty laws, companies that process the nation’s citizens’ personal information have to fulfill the German government’s data protection requirements, even if they are located outside the country’s borders.
As per the BDSG-new, those who infringe the data protection laws of Germany – for example, illegally transferring data to third parties – could face criminal charges with up to three years in prison.
Like Germany, in addition to the GDPR’s rules, France has implemented its own data sovereignty laws to protect its citizens.
Based on France’s Data Protection Act 2, when an organization interacts with the personal information of its citizens – even if it processes the data outside the nation’s borders – it must comply with French regulations in addition to fulfilling the GDPR’s requirements.
In Australia, data sovereignty laws come in the form of the Federal Privacy Act of 1988 and its Australian Privacy Principles (APPs).
Similar to Canada’s data sovereignty measures, the organization that transfers the data to a third party is responsible for how that service provider handles the information and whether it complies with the APPs.
Also, Australian organizations have to ensure that the third party does not breach the APPs while it processes the data.
The GDPR is one of the most prominent data privacy laws that governments have implemented to protect their citizens’ personal information.
For breaching the GDPR, organizations can be fined by as high as 20 million EUR or by the equivalent of 4% of their global turnover.
After becoming active in 2018, EU authorities have imposed fines of nearly 500 million EUR on organizations that have breached the GDPR’s data protection requirements.
In addition to rules like the right to be forgotten, the GDPR also includes data sovereignty measures.
According to the GDPR, organizations that collect or process the personal information of EU citizens have to store the data within the region or in a jurisdiction that offers similar data protection levels.
Furthermore, no matter where the company stores, collects, or processes the data, it has to comply with the GDPR’s rules in case it handles the personal information of European Union citizens.
From the consumer’s point of view, data sovereignty requirements regulate how businesses interact with their customers’ personal information while preventing third-party service providers from abusing the data.
While data sovereignty requirements are not introduced in every nation and can’t fully protect user data, proper regulations discourage organizations from abusing their users’ personal information.
While consumers are often those who benefit from data sovereignty requirements, businesses must find ways to comply with the relevant data privacy and security laws of each nation.
Therefore, in addition to knowing local, regional, and international data privacy laws, organizations have to develop a new or use existing infrastructure for data collection, processing, and storage that aligns with all the relevant data sovereignty requirements.
Data sovereignty measures could also make things complicated for companies that store their data in the cloud.
For example, an Australian organization has two options to comply with its nations’ data sovereignty laws.
It’s clear that whichever option the business chooses, it requires some extra legwork from the company’s side.
However, doing so helps ensure that the data of the nation’s citizens remain safe(r) with data sovereignty.
It’s good to see that multiple governments are implementing data sovereignty measures to ensure that organizations treat their citizens’ personal information appropriately.
However, despite the strict laws, we are still very far from reaching true data sovereignty.
Businesses can still take advantage of our personal information and use it to increase their profits by selling our info to data vendors while we receive nothing in return.
Permission is determined to end this by creating a next-generation, blockchain-based advertising platform where users have full control over their data.
If a user gives permission to an advertiser to use his data or leverages his time to engage with the advertiser’s campaigns, he gets rewarded in Permission.io’s ASK cryptocurrency. The user can hold, exchange, or spend the currency in the Permission.io Store.
On the other hand, by only targeting consumers with ads they’ve granted permission for, businesses earn the trust and loyalty of their users while building long-term relationships and achieving a holistic view of their customer’s needs in real-time.
Take a look at Permission’s official website to learn more about the win-win advertising model (including the innovative Permission Browser Extension) that is changing who controls and profits from our data.
There are always times when you could use some extra cash. Whether you’re chipping away at student debt or covering some of your daycare bills, knowing the best online destinations for making a few extra dollars when you need them is good to have in your back pocket.
There are many survey apps out there, so we’re not going to throw a bunch at you. Instead, we’ve hand-picked a few of the best based on pay potential, usability, and reliability. All of our research was focused on minimizing time-in and maximizing money-out.
Here’s our list of the best paid survey apps to make money with:
Prolific is an academic site where universities and Ph.D. students pay participants to complete surveys necessary to their research. It’s really fun for participants because they get to be a part of interesting research, and the pay is good too.
After you sign up for an account, you fill out a series of demographic questions and then receive email notifications for surveys you qualify for. Once you receive a notification, you go to their portal and sign-up to take the survey. These surveys are usually a bit more involved, but you’re getting paid more and the questions are more interesting than typical demographic surveys.
Prolific aims for a minimum of $6.50 an hour and people report $30-$40 per month, but ultimately it depends on how much time you put in, how quickly you complete surveys, and how many surveys you qualify for. Prolific generally pays higher than other survey apps, though.
You can cash out on PayPal or Circle.
Sign up for Prolific here.
Google Opinion Rewards is a Google Program that pings users to fill out surveys in return for credit they can spend in the Play Store.
Everything is handled within Google’s fantastic app. You receive notifications to fill out surveys or answer questions. According to Google, questions can range from, “Which logo is best?” and “Which promotion is most compelling?” to “When do you plan on traveling next?” After you finish the prompts, your account is automatically credited with Google Rewards cash.
Google offers up to $1 in Google Credit per paid survey, and their surveys are usually short. I’d use this app more as a way to buy Kindle books or pay for apps and/or subscriptions you’re already in the habit of buying.
Your earnings can only be spent in the Google Play store, so it’s best to use this to pay for subscriptions you’re already using or to buy books. Saving on entertainment is still saving.
Sign up for Google Opinion Rewards here.
dscout is a platform that connects brands with users to create in-depth, video-based research experiences.
It’s free to sign-up, and everything is handled through their app. After you create an account, you can start applying for “missions.” These missions are usually 30min to an hour in length and involve you taking a video of yourself either experiencing a product or answering questions about a product or experience.
Typically $40-$100+ per study that lasts around an hour, but spots fill up quickly and you won’t qualify for every opportunity.
You can get paid through PayPal, by opting for gift cards, or sometimes getting product samples.
Sign up for dscout here.
UserTesting is a “human insight” platform that enables brands to view screen-recorded experiences of their product or website by actual humans. This lets them test changes before implementing them on a larger scale.
You sign up via email either on their website or through the User Testing mobile app, and then you sign up for tests manually. You can set up notifications for new testing opportunities, and the stronger your user rating the more tests you’re accepted for, generally.
You get paid $10 per 20-minute test and can make even more when you’re interviewed, and some users report making hundreds of dollars a month. It just depends on how many reviews you manage to qualify for — the competition is pretty fierce.
You get paid in cash via PayPal exactly a week after you complete a test or interview.
Sign up for UserTesting here.
Survey Junkie is a survey-only app that pays survey responders small amounts in return for filling out surveys for their brand partners.
You can sign up online or on their mobile app. It takes just a few seconds, and then you’ll have the opportunity to fill out your profile in return for points. After you get set up, you can view the available surveys and get started. It’s a straightforward platform.
Survey Junkie’s points translate directly into cents, so 1 point = 1 cent. Most users report around $2-$5 an hour, and surveys take from just a few minutes to up to 20 to get through them.
Sometimes you can also qualify for focus groups that pay between $50-$100.
You can spend your points on gift cards or get paid out via PayPal.
Sign up for Survey Junkie here.
Swagbucks is the biggest player in the survey and free reward marketplace. It’s backed by Yahoo and offers rewards for surveys, searching the web, watching videos, opting into cashback product offers, and more.
Swagbucks is all about collecting points. There are a bunch of different activities you can complete to collect points, from watching videos to completing surveys. Your best bet is to take advantage of the daily polls, offers, and featured surveys. There are a lot of ways to waste time on Swagbucks, so taking the time to develop a strategy that minimizes your effort is ideal.
Swagbucks is a reliable platform but is far from lucrative. $10-$20 a month with minimal effort is fairly standard, but some power users claim to make hundreds of dollars a month. It depends on the opportunities available and how well you can play the system, but don’t expect to make a lot.
You can spend your points on gift cards or get paid out via PayPal.
Sign up for Swagbucks here.
Many sources quote $3-4 an hour as the average earnings on big survey app sites. While this can add up over time, it’s not going to be the best use of your time. Instead, use survey apps to fill otherwise non-monetary gaps like waiting for your kids at school or sitting in the dentist’s office, etc.
This goes a bit beyond strictly paid survey apps, but there are many companies that also pay you for your browsing & choices around shopping. If you can have a healthy flow of more specific, higher-paying survey opportunities mixed with “always-available” apps like Swagbucks AND have an extension like Qwee rewarding you for your natural behavior on browsers, then you’ll have the best mix of paying opportunities.
Surveys that only apply to a small group of people always pay better. Whatever app(s) you use, be as specific as possible about who you are and the experience you have. Surveys that are looking for “25-34 non-white teachers with children under 10” will pay much more than “looking for women.” Aim for surveys you are uniquely qualified for.
Depending on how many apps you sign up for, you could be flooded with survey opportunities. I recommend setting up a separate email address like nathansurveys@gmail.com to have one place to collect all of those messages.
And then if you want to take it to the next level, set up a filter that notifies you when certain keywords related to your expertise are found in emails. E.g., if you have a non-profit background you could ping your other email address when “non-profit” is found — that way you know you should respond to that survey opportunity.
The opportunities in survey apps can vary quite a bit. From walking through websites with sites like UserTest to getting actual products and reviewing them on video with dscout, it’s mentally refreshing to diversify your work.
What is the highest paying survey app?
There is no one app that pays the most. Each app offers varying opportunities and the pay scale for those opportunities can change dramatically, although apps that require you to record video usually pay more.
In general, the more you can qualify for surveys that are uniquely fitted to your demographic the better. I.e., a survey looking for random people regardless of who they are to fill out what they think of a logo will pay much less than a survey asking ex-accountants to review a new accounting software. Use your resume to your advantage.
Are survey apps worth it?
That answer is relative to your situation. There are many great ways to make money online besides surveys, but knocking out surveys in what would otherwise be wasted downtime is absolutely worth it. Plus, if you can sign up for enough legitimate survey sites and only fill out the high-paying, high-specificity surveys, you can definitely make it worth your time.
Which paid survey sites are legitimate? Are paid surveys even safe?
There are many legitimate and safe survey sites, but there are also many predatory sites. The best way to evaluate a site is to take a look at their user reviews & user experience. If they don’t have many reviews or if the app itself seems really hacked together, stay away!
How long do paid surveys usually take?
Many last around 5-15 minutes, but surveys can range anywhere from just a few short minutes to 60min+.
Do I need to pay tax on online surveys?
You definitely have to report it. Whether or not you actually pay taxes on it will depend on your financial situation & whether or not you claim expenses around the income.
Can you make a living off of surveys?
Not really. It’s smart to look at surveys as low-intensity, low-labor work that you can tap into to pad your main source of income. We don’t recommend attempting to make a liveable wage off of surveys.
Do the best survey apps vary for Android and Apple?
Not really. Most of the big players are on both!
What if you owned your data instead of Facebook, or Google, or any other internet service that takes your data and sells it for a profit? What if you got paid for the targeted advertising these tech giants sell at your expense? You deserve a piece of that, don’t you?
Permission has created a cryptocurrency that enables permission-based engagement and that compensates you for your data. The Permission Browser Extension pays you for watching ads as you go about your everyday internet browsing. And that’s just the beginning.
Have you heard about data residency?
If you haven’t, it’s a concept that determines where different organizations store your data.
Some nations have stricter data protection laws, while others have implemented only minor measures.
As you don’t want your data to fall into the wrong hands, the location of your personal information is crucial.
In this article, we will discuss what data residency means and how it differs from data localization and data sovereignty. We’ll also explore the measures different nations use.
Data residency is where an organization – government body, industrial body, or business – specifies the geographical location of their choice for where they store their data.
There are various reasons why an organization would do this:
Have you heard of data localization and data sovereignty?
These terms are often used interchangeably with data residency frequently being used in the wrong way.
While data residency, data localization, and data sovereignty are closely related, they refer to concepts with different meanings, which could create some confusion amongst both consumers and businesses.
Let’s resolve the confusion and get things clear now.
The first and least restrictive concept is data residency, where a government body, industrial body, or business simply specifies the geographical location where it stores its data.
As illustrated in the last section’s examples, with data residency, the organization has a choice as to where it wishes to store its data.
On the other hand, data sovereignty is a more restrictive concept. It represents the idea that data is subject to the nation’s laws where it is collected, processed, and stored.
Therefore, businesses have to comply with local data protection laws to avoid getting fined by the government.
Data localization is the most restrictive concept of the three.
While data residency gives organizations a choice to specify the geographical location where its data is stored, data localization refers to keeping the data of businesses within the borders of a country.
The concept almost always refers to the storage and creation of the data, and some nations that have implemented data localization laws require organizations to keep only the copy of the data within the country.
If there’s a valid reason, such data localization laws allow the government to audit its citizens’ data without requiring the nation’s authorities to interact with other governments.
On the other hand, some nations have implemented very restrictive data localization laws, prohibiting the data from crossing the country’s borders.
For example, Russia’s On Personal Data Law (OPD-Law) requires organizations to store, retrieve, and update data exclusively in data centers within the nation’s borders.
While stating that their goal is to protect their citizens’ data, these nations often implement strict data localization measures to secure a market advantage for local data centers that align with their data protectionism-related goals.
By doing so, such laws restrict the international flow of data. Therefore, critics argue that it prevents organizations from realizing the full potential of their data while contributing to “digital factionalism” and the “splinternet.”
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is among the world’s most popular data privacy laws.
As per the GDPR, companies that interact with the personal information of European Union citizens – both within and outside the EU – have to comply with strict data privacy laws.
While EU authorities can impose fines up to 20 million EUR on businesses or acquire 4% of their total global turnover as a penalty for non-compliance, there are no data residency laws in the GDPR.
Therefore, as per the EU data residency laws, organizations are free to choose where they host the data of European Union citizens.
However, businesses still have to comply with the EU’s (mostly data sovereignty-related) laws that require companies to fulfill specific requirements when transferring data outside of the European Union.
For example, a business could only transfer data to a third country if that nation has similarly adequate data safeguards as the EU or the company has a valid legal reason.
As of today, the EU has issued 13 adequacy decisions.
This means that European Union authorities (at least partially) consider these nations to have satisfactory data safeguards, allowing companies to transfer the personal information of EU citizens to these locations.
According to the Personally Controlled Health Records Act of 2012, all personal medical information in Australia has to be stored in local servers.
While the law ensures that foreign governments are unable to access Australian citizens’ personal health records, the Oceanic nation’s data residency law prevents medical service providers, such as IBM Watson Health, from offering solutions to the nation’s citizens and organizations.
In Canada, two provinces (British Columbia and Nova Scotia) require public bodies (e.g. schools, public agencies, hospitals) to store their personal data within the nation’s borders where the data can only be accessed from the country.
China has one of the strictest data residency and localization laws on the globe.
In addition to restricting access to certain websites as part of the Golden Shield Program (also referred to as “the Great Firewall of China”), organizations have to comply with a wide range of data residency measures.
For example, companies offering e-banking services in China have to locate their data servers in the Asian nation. At the same time, Chinese personal financial information can only be analyzed, stored, and processed locally.
Also, the data of internet-based mapping services, as well as medical and health records, have to be kept in China.
Certain companies also have to comply with a cybersecurity law that prohibits personal information and important business data from leaving the country.
In France, data produced by local and national public administrations have to be stored with cloud services that are within the country’s borders.
It is also illegal in the European country to move information that is connected to legal proceedings outside of the nation.
Germany has similar views on data residency as France, advocating the idea of national clouds where personal information can be stored locally within its borders.
While data residency laws can vary by state, all organizations within Germany have to store accounting data in the European country.
Furthermore, organizations and individuals liable for taxes in Germany have to keep their accounting records within the country’s borders (with some exceptions).
Similarly to China, Russia has implemented strict data residency and localization laws.
As per the 2015 Personal Data Law, the data operators that collect personal information from Russian citizens are required to do all their data-related operations using databases that are physically located in the nation.
In addition to requiring companies to store all telecommunications data in the country for six months, the Russian government could impose a fine or shut down the services of businesses that refuse or fail to comply with the nation’s data residency laws.
As organizations specify the geographical location to store data, data residency has a great influence on where businesses keep your personal information.
Since data residency laws vary by country – for example, there are strict requirements in China and Russia while minimal regulation in Canada and the EU (GDPR) – it’s important to know where the services you use are storing your data.
If that nation has data sovereignty laws, businesses have to comply with them, which means that the government may access your personal information for any (valid) reasons.
While proper data sovereignty rules can help consumers protect their personal information, strict data localization laws could do more harm than good (e.g., the government can monitor the data easily while restricting the international flow of information).
Permission, the advertising platform of the future, uses blockchain technology to achieve true data sovereignty by enabling full control over its users’ personal information.
Consumers are free to choose whether and how advertisers can use their data.
In exchange for sharing their personal information and engaging with advertising campaigns, users are rewarded in ASK, Permission’s native cryptocurrency, which they can spend on the Permission platform, hodl, or exchange.
Sounds great, huh?
Now check out Permission’s official website to learn more about this new blockchain-based advertising model and its innovative Browser Extension! You can also join the discussion via the Permission.io Telegram channel.
There are enough arguments about “what Web 3.0 is” to make it impossible to point to a single authoritative definition. But that’s fine, it means we can propose our own definition of Web 3.0.
Here it is:
Web 3.0 is the third generation of the Internet—a global network that permits intelligent interactions between all its users and devices.
Now to explain ourselves…
Web 1.0 was the early Internet that persisted until about 2000. At first, websites were just places you could read the information posted on servers and interact with such servers in simple ways. There were search engines, and there were e-commerce sites like Amazon and eBay.
Web 2.0 arose following the turn of the century. It was far more interactive, far more collaborative, and far more capable. There were technical reasons why, not least of which was the rapidly improved bandwidth available to users, and servers. It is this generation of the web that gave us smartphones and mobile computing. Web 2.0 could support near real-time interactions and thus collaborative activity was feasible. Social networks like Facebook and Twitter were part of this, but so were graphical multiplayer games. It also included the birth of Big Data and the machine learning algorithms that sifted through it.
Web 3.0 is defined by intelligence. This intelligence is not just in interactions between people and websites, but between software and software. And, there’s more than that. The difference between Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 has multiple aspects.
We will discuss them one by one.
Web 1.0 and web 2.0 are defined by the HTTP protocol and the simple file systems it provides access to. The protocol enables resources to be accessed (via a URL) and also files, particularly HTML documents.
It is a client-server protocol that currently provides the foundation of all data exchanges over the Internet. The term client-server means that there is a requesting side (a client – usually a web browser) that calls for information from a server (a computer that serves up information – usually web pages or parts of web pages).
The protocol works by virtue of Domain Name Servers (DNS) servers. There is a large network of these which includes thirteen root servers.
You can think of the DNS servers as a postal service for the request you make from your browser via the HTTP protocol. They deliver that request to the address you specify, which will be something of the form:
http://www.thewebsite.com/the-page-I-want
When thewebsite.com receives this message, it sends you a message back, the page you want, using the same postal service.
It may be more complicated than that. In reality, it may involve multiple messages, including ads that you don’t want to see. Nevertheless, it all happens through a kind of postal service.
With Web 3.0 that mechanism will change. Indeed, we might be inclined to call it Internet 3.0.
The technology that will most likely replace the current DNS system goes by the name of the InterPlanetary File System, IPFS for short.
Why wasn’t it called the InterStellar Files System or even the InterGalactic File System? Perhaps its designers lacked ambition.
The IPFS is also a postal system, but it is not centralized around a group of root servers like the HTTP protocol. The goal in the design of IPFS, which is a child of blockchain technology, was to create a peer-to-peer file system that worked after the fashion of BitTorrent, the file streaming service that is frequently used to download and share videos and music.
IPFS separates the act of seeking information from the act of retrieving it. It does so through the magic of content addressing.
Content addressing is a math trick where you apply a hashing algorithm to some content (such as a web page) and it generates a unique key that acts as its address. To cut a long story short, you provide the network with that address, and a server that holds the information sends it to you.
IPFS has lots of advantages over HTTP. Here’s a list:
Assuming IPFS is successful, all of these advantages become Web 3.0 advantages.
Digital identities are another technology that was spawned by the blockchain, and it may become the most important feature of Web 3.0. The point is that Web 2.0 is infested with cybercrime—dark deeds of every description from identity theft to click fraud.
It happens because the connection between two computers is not properly authenticated, and currently cannot be authenticated. Let me spell it out.
With web 2.0 a server never knows for sure that the client software accessing it is what it pretends to be—a browser under the control of an identifiable human being. Neither, on the other side of the equation, does the browser know whether the server and the files it is accessing are the ones it intends to access.
However, if everything involved in such an interaction had a verifiable identity, fraud and deception would be far more difficult to perpetrate. With Digital IDs, individuals can only have one verifiable identity, since each ID has to be linked to a unique credential, like a birth certificate. Similarly, organizations can only have one verifiable identity. As regards everything else (hardware and software) involved in the interaction between a client and server, these things can be directly tied to a unique ID belonging to an individual or an organization.
What is more, because of a brilliant technology that goes by the name of zero-knowledge proof, it is possible for either side to prove they are authentic without even revealing their identity.
Digital IDs enable two important features of Web 3.0:
(As you have probably realized, Permission‘s business model is strongly connected to this aspect of Web 3.0)
The blockchain is fundamental to Web 3.0, in several ways. We have mentioned two so far: bullet-proof Digital IDs and a distributed file system. Perhaps its most important contribution is its primary use, its ability to create cryptocurrencies, and particularly the ability to use such currencies to make micropayments.
This stems from the low cost of a cryptocurrency transaction. In the non-blockchain world, the cost of a credit or debit card transaction is calculated as a percentage of the value plus a fixed amount (say, 10 cents). The seller pays. So sellers are unlikely to allow credit card payment for products with a ticket price less than about $10.
The cost of a blockchain payment is generally much lower. In practice, it varies quite a lot between different cryptocurrencies as it depends on how the blockchain is organized. Low-cost examples include an EOS transaction at $0.0105 and a TRON transaction was $0.0000901 (measured in March 2018).
With such low transaction costs, it becomes possible to sell things for a few cents. A few cents could be the fee charged for reading an article from a national or local newspaper or a magazine. Being able to charge per article that way will revolutionize web publishing. Low-cost sales of products and services will be a reality with Web 3.0.
Some might argue that the blockchain’s most important contribution is automated trust. This stretches beyond the security that the blockchain can deliver through digital IDs by building a web of trust.
Some blockchains enable the creation of “smart contracts”, programs that are attached to the blockchain and that execute when triggered by a specific blockchain event. The important point about smart contracts is that the program code is the contract.
This makes smart contracts far more certain than a legal contract. Legal contracts are enforced through the legal system, which varies in reliability from one place to another but is never perfect. The outcome of a challenge to a legal contract is never certain.
However, smart contracts can be trusted 100%. A simple example of a smart contract is given by the movement of goods through a supply chain. Goods are dispatched with an RFID tag that reports their location when read. When the goods reach specific locations the smart contract can automatically enact payment—for transport or for warehousing or import duties. Payments are thus predictable and can be trusted 100% to occur.
Naturally, smart contracts can be far more complex than that example. They can cover many situations that are currently covered by legal contracts, diminishing the possibility of fraud.
Another facet of Web 3.0 is the presentation of data in a semantic form. We will not dive into the technology behind that here, but you can get a sense of it from Google’s Knowledge Graph which places blocks of organized data to the right of some of your search results.
If you don’t recognize what I’m talking about, do a search on “Galileo’s trial”. Notice that Google gives you a succinct summary of your search topic, as well as the usual collection of links. That’s the work of Google’s Knowledge Graph.
But now try a search on “Who attended Galileo’s trial?”
At the moment such a question is too complex for Google to unravel. However, it could if it had a greater grasp of the meaning of the question and if the websites it surveys organized their metadata in a more semantically friendly manner.
OK, that’s academic, not economic.
But now think about searching for products. It’s here where the commercial magic of Web 3.0 steps in. Nowadays in the US, more product searches happen on Amazon than on Google. Yet neither of these Web 2.0 giants can answer detailed product questions like “what is the best deal available for a 55” HD TV for delivery within 2 days.”
From the consumer’s perspective, a practical answer to such a question would serve up a range of information, offering possible choices rather than just a set of web links.
That kind of capability will be part of Web 3.0 by virtue of semantic technology. It will save buyers and sellers a good deal of time in the sales cycle.
The paradigm we have become accustomed to is that of “browser and website”.
We have browser plugins that provide certain services for us (clipping copies of web pages, filling in passwords, ad blocking, and so on.)
On the website side of the equation, websites have been fairly unresponsive in interacting with their visitors, with the exception of the web giants with the big bucks who can afford Big Data AI and thus software that responds to the user in real-time.
The paradigm for Web 3.0 will be different. The individual user will begin to regard what we now call a browser as a kind of operating system that runs applications. What we now think of as plugins will become our applications, and while they will still be able to show us documents or videos, as before, some apps will be capable of much more.
For example, a shopping application will help its owner buy, say a car, by gathering data from him or her and then going out to find suitable links for the user to visit. Ultimately such software should be able to help the user through the whole buying process, including negotiating a reasonable price.
Just as nowadays hackers and some websites run bots, in Web 3.0 the user will be able to buy and configure bots that serve them directly. Bots are, after all, just applications.
This development may take a while as it depends on the proliferation of digital IDs and also good semantics.
Most web users are painfully aware of digital ads that follow them around the web or the ads that Facebook drops before their eyes or Amazon’s efforts to tempt them to buy something else “they might like” when they are about to place an order. Among the websites with big budgets, the twin weapons of Big Data (your data mainly) and AI provide commercial firepower that puts the customer at a disadvantage.
However, intelligence can cut both ways. AI could equally well serve individuals if they take control of their data and collaborate in finding effective ways to exploit it. In short, with Web 3.0 the possibilities of AI are likely to broaden, but to the disadvantage of the big guys.
The advent of 3D Graphics is a natural consequence of graphical software evolution. If you are not sure what 3D graphics is, here’s an example. Such animation owes a great deal to WebGL (Web Graphics Library), which is a JavaScript API that can render interactive 2D and 3D graphics within web browsers without the need for any plug-in. It is based on the OpenGL graphics language and uses elements of HTML5. An important technical detail is that it can exploit GPUs and thus performs well.
3D Graphics will make an impact outside the obvious areas of online games and entertainment. It is likely to be used in education, health care, real estate, and other areas of e-commerce. It’s also likely that, in time, individuals will design and use their own 3D avatars.
While you can view blockchain-related technology (Distributed file systems, Digital IDs, micropayments, etc.) as related developments, 3D Graphics is simply an evolutionary development. It was inevitably going to develop in a given time; it just happens to be coming to maturity at the same time as these other Web 3.0 technologies.
Over time, Web 3.0 will remove many of the inconveniences of Web 2.0.
We can expect the Web to be available on any device (pad, mobile phone, desktop) seamlessly. The Internet of Things will join the party, with every household device controllable from anywhere and, where appropriate, able to be used as a web access device.
Ultimately, this means that your identity, and most things you own, and all your data, as well as every software capability you have a right to use, will be linked together and able to work together.
New technology generations are never born on a specific date. Even Web 1.0 didn’t happen on a particular date.
You could say it began as soon as the first browser was released in a usable condition. But at that time there weren’t many websites. You might, therefore, claim that it was born when websites began to multiply. But realistically it didn’t happen until the first search engines appeared. However, you might want to argue that it didn’t occur then, but when the first true e-commerce sites began working.
The point is that it slowly emerged. Web 2.0 with its social networks, multiplayer games, and big data algorithms also took a while to come of age.
Web 3.0 will be the same.
Perhaps you will wake up one morning and realize that your browser embodies a set of bots that do really useful things for you, that you have a Digital ID and that you can interact intelligently with the Internet. When that happens you will have a right to declare: “Oh yes, this is Web 3.0.”
Did you know there’s a way you can cut your unnecessary expenses while growing your Bitcoin holdings?
Yep, that’s right. It’s called stacking sats. And there are some cool ways to stack sats without paying a penny.
Sounds awesome, doesn’t it?
In this article, we will explore the exciting world of stacking sats while giving you tips to convert the expenses you don’t need into BTC.
“Stacking Sats” refers to regularly accumulating small amounts of Bitcoin over time via either buying, earning, or mining BTC. “Sats” refers to satoshis, the smallest unit of Bitcoin.
The unit was named after BTC’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, who launched the world’s first cryptocurrency in 2009 after publishing the official Bitcoin whitepaper in late 2008.
How many sats are in a Bitcoin?
1 Bitcoin = one hundred million satoshis
1 Satoshi = 0.00000001 bitcoin
At the time of writing this article, one BTC trades at $8,870, with one satoshi being $0.0000887.
Before blowing up the cryptocurrency community, the term “stacking sats” started with a tweet in late December 2017.
Later on, the term was mentioned on several occasions in the crypto community.
However, what helped it become popular was Bitcoin advocate Matt Odell’s “Tales From The Crypt” podcast in February 2019. In that episode, Odell advised his listeners to stack sats by earning or purchasing Bitcoin on a regular basis.
As a result of the popular podcast episode, crypto enthusiasts have started to post screenshots on Twitter as proof for how they’ve accumulated BTC using the #stackingsats hashtag on the social media platform.
After stacking sats became a thing in the crypto space, many blockchain companies joined the movement of accumulating Bitcoin.
With the growing interest in stacking sats, crypto solutions have appeared on the market, offering cashback offers and other ways for consumers to earn BTC.
Even Twitter and Square CEO Jack Dorsey – who has been widely known for his pro-crypto approach – joined the movement, posting a screenshot on Twitter in March 2019 as proof for stacking sats.
Now that you know everything about crypto’s new trending movement, it’s time for us to show you some handy tips and tricks that you can use to stack sats.
Let’s see them!
The first option to stack stats is by separating a fixed amount of funds, and using them periodically to purchase Bitcoin (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly).
This method is based on the investing strategy of dollar-cost averaging (DCA).
Unlike lump-sum investing, where you use all your funds at once to purchase an asset, investors using the DCA method decide how much they are willing to spend and at which periods prior to the actual investment.
Let us illustrate this method with an example:
After receiving your salary and paying your monthly expenses, you decide to separate a fixed amount of funds to purchase $100 worth of BTC on the tenth day of the month.
You continue doing this in the upcoming months until you accumulate your desired amount of Bitcoin.
It’s important to mention that the DCA method goes against the strategy of timing your investments.
Therefore, if you choose to stack sats this way, then you should forget about looking at the charts before making your regular BTC purchases.
As a result, this method relieves some stress from investors as you don’t have to worry about checking the Bitcoin price before making your investment. Also, as there is no market timing involved, you won’t feel any regret if the BTC price falls after purchasing it.
Enjoying a warm cup of your favorite coffee is one of the most comforting things to do every morning.
In fact, coffee is the most popular beverage in the world, with over 400 billion cups consumed every year on a global scale.
But what if we told you that many people are overspending on this fine beverage?
According to an Amerisleep study, people between 25 and 34 spend an average of $2,008 on coffee in a year, which breaks down to a monthly $167.
If you recognize yourself among the participants of the study and you are keen on stacking sats, we recommend cutting your coffee expense by a lot.
We are not saying that you should quit drinking coffee ASAP, as we don’t want to take away the world’s most beloved beverage from you.
Instead, you should consider brewing your favorite caffeinated drink at home and take it to work, rather than purchasing a fancy latte for $5 in a coffee shop.
Now, sticking to your new, cost-efficient, coffee-drinking habit, check how much funds you saved at the end of the month.
Oh, and don’t forget to use your coffee savings to stack sats!
Everyone knows smoking is bad for one’s health.
However, many forget that this expensive habit could easily drain your monthly budget.
The average cost of cigarettes in the US today is $6.16, and the largest group of American smokers were consuming between 10 and 19 cigarettes a day in 2019.
If we calculate the average of ten cigarettes (half a pack), that person spends $3.08 a day on tobacco, which adds up to $92.4 in every month and $1,108 annually.
Calculating with the current Bitcoin price ($8,870), this person could use his annual smoking budget to purchase 0.125 BTC.
And what would be more convincing to give up on smoking than some shiny sats in a Bitcoin wallet?
While alcohol is a popular beverage when one is hanging out with his friends in their favorite pub, it is one of the top budget-killers out there.
According to Alcohol.org, the average New Yorker spends over $2,000 on alcoholic beverages in a year, which breaks down to a monthly $167.
So, if you feel like stacking sats and reducing your luxury expenses, then don’t forget to check how much you spend on alcohol each month.
Even if you don’t want to eliminate the beverage from your life, decreasing the amount you consume in each month could help you in your quest to accumulate BTC.
Americans spend up to $100 in a month ($1,200 a year) for cable TV.
And many are paying for their cable subscriptions despite the fact that they turn on their TVs only a few times in a month.
Fortunately, online streaming alternatives – such as HBO Now, Netflix, and Hulu – come at much lower prices. Therefore, switching from cable to streaming could help you in cutting your expenses, especially when a single service is enough for you to stream your favorite shows and movies.
According to Bankrate, those who cut the cord could enjoy tremendous hours of video content for less than $50 per month.
Therefore, canceling your expensive cable TV service could allow you to accumulate at least $50 of BTC every month.
Going to the gym is a great way to lose some weight and stay in shape.
But what is the purpose of your membership if you don’t use it?
According to Glofox, 6.3% of Americans spent a total of $1.8 billion on gym memberships without using them in 2018.
As the average cost of a gym membership is $58 per month in the United States, failing to use it could lead to the unnecessary expense of nearly $700 a year.
Unless you want to start hitting the gym regularly, you can eliminate that expense to stack sats.
Now that you have eliminated the expenses you don’t need, it’s time to see an exciting method that lets you stack crypto sats without spending a dime.
As stacking sats has become a popular movement in the crypto space, multiple blockchain projects have introduced apps and services where users could earn cashback on their purchases.
Lolli, for example, is one of the most popular Bitcoin cashback solutions. After installing the Lolli browser extension, the app will let you know when you have visited one of its partner stores where you can earn up to 30% cashback in BTC.
Fold is a very similar service to Lolli. Using its smartphone app (available on both iOS and Android) will allow you to stack sats when you make purchases on popular services, such as Amazon and Uber.
What’s more interesting is that Fold has recently partnered with Visa to launch a card that lets users earn Bitcoin back on their purchases.
Other popular crypto cashback services include:
Mining Bitcoin is one of the oldest methods of stacking sats.
As Bitcoin uses the Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus algorithm, miners in the BTC network are required to use their computational power to maintain the ecosystem, verify transactions, and add new blocks to the distributed ledger.
In exchange, miners earn block rewards after successfully adding a new block to the chain while getting a share of transaction fees for verifying BTC transfers.
However, as opposed to crypto cashback, mining Bitcoin requires an upfront investment from your end as you have to purchase special mining equipment – an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) miner – which you have to set up to be able to mine the cryptocurrency.
In addition to the setup costs, you will have to pay for the energy your miner uses as well as for cooling your rig.
Therefore, if you want to stack sats with this method, we recommend calculating your potential income and expenses to evaluate profitability prior to starting your Bitcoin mining operation.
Another method you can use to mine Bitcoin is via cloud mining services. With these solutions, you don’t have to purchase a mining rig, and you don’t have to worry about setting it up or running it as the service provider takes care of those for you.
Therefore, cloud mining is a much more convenient option for those who want to stack sats via mining BTC but don’t have the necessary resources or technical background.
On the flip side, service providers often charge hefty fees for cloud mining contracts, which could decrease your profit margin.
Furthermore, there’s a lot of scams involved in the cloud mining space. Because of this reason, we advise you to do your own due diligence and choose a reputable service if you decide to stack sats using a cloud mining solution.
Pro tip: Some altcoins use alternative algorithms to reach consensus within their blockchain networks that don’t require block validators to physically mine (or use their computational power) to validate blocks.
For example, the validators in Proof-of-Stake blockchain networks are rewarded for locking a part of their coins for a certain time to maintain the ecosystem.
If you don’t want to spend a fortune on mining equipment, you can check out these blockchain networks to stack sats.
Do you hate that tech giants like Google and Facebook are selling your data to advertisers who use it to bombard you with annoying ads?
We hear you.
But it doesn’t have to be this way.
Meet Permission, the cutting-edge advertising platform that rewards you in ASK coins for providing your data with your permission and for taking the time to engage with ads. Download the Permission Browser Extension and have relevant ads delivered to you wherever you surf the web, with crypto payments for every one you watch.
While you have full control over your data, you can use the ASK you earned to stack sats or shop directly via Permission’s Shop With ASK store.
And the best?
You don’t have to spend a dime to stack sats with Permission.io!
Stacking sats is one of the best things that ever happened to crypto.
If you choose to mine or buy crypto regularly via the DCA method, you invest in supporting the decentralized economy while accumulating BTC.
Stacking sats also helps you to convert those unnecessary expenses into Bitcoin. It’s a win-win scenario as you eliminate your budget-draining habits while accumulating some shiny sats.
Furthermore, crypto cashback apps allow you to shop at your favorite stores while getting rewarded in Bitcoin.
You can even get rid of those annoying ads and choose the ones you’d like to watch as well as control the data you provide to advertisers while being rewarded in ASK on the Permission.io platform.
Aren’t you stoked to be stacking sats while engaging with businesses on the advertising platform of the future?
What are you waiting for?
Head to the official Permission website now to stack some shiny sats!
Join our newsletter for the latest news and product updates
