Subscribe to our newsletter!

Submit

Thank you for signing up for our newsletter!

We’re excited to have you with us and will keep you updated with the latest news, insights, and updates straight to your inbox.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Back to Blog
October 21, 2020
|
Read time {time} min

What Are Cookies? Types, Uses, & Why They’re Crumbling

Written by
Permission
Stay in the loop

Get the latest insights, product updates, and news from Permission — shaping the future of user-owned data and AI innovation.

Subscribe

It’s the end of the road for third-party cookies—and that’s a good thing.

Perhaps you don’t know what third party cookies are. Let’s begin by explaining why cookies exist at all.

What Is a Cookie?

A cookie is a parcel of data stored in the browser to speed-up and simplify interactions between the browser and a website it is connected to. Any data can be stored in a cookie.

How Do Cookies Work?

The browser provides a place where websites can store data when that website is being accessed, and the browser stores it. The idea was invented by Lou Montulli of Netscape Communications in 1994, the year that the Web was born.

The problem was that a PC could disconnect from a website for many reasons: the PC or the website might crash or the internet could disconnect. So the website cookie could store your identity data, your preferences, and maybe even session information. Then, if anything failed you could restart near to where you left off.

Since then things have become more complex and there are several different types of cookie, as follows.

The Different Types of Internet Cookies

The Session Cookie

These are temporary cookies that last only for the duration of a session. They tend to store mundane data like login credentials and usually evaporate when you reboot the computer or close the browser. They can also be used to help with website performance like ensuring fast page loads.

There’s unlikely to be anything objectionable stored in these cookies.

The Persistent Cookie

Websites that plant these cookies in your browser usually give them an expiration date, which could be any time from seconds to years.

You know you have a persistent identity cookie if you are on a website and reboot your computer only to discover when you return to the website that you are still logged in.

Such cookies are commonly used to track your on-site behavior and to tailor your user experience.

There is unlikely to be anything objectionable about these cookies either.

The Secure Cookie

These cookies assist with encryption and hence are definitely good guys. They are only transmitted securely (via HTTPS) and they are used to implement security on banking and shopping websites.

They keep your financial details secret but allow the site to remember those details.

The First-Party Cookie

All the above are examples of first-party cookies. Technically first-party simply means that it’s a two-way arrangement between you and the website. However, many websites monitor website traffic with help from external vendors, particularly Google with Google Analytics.

The cookies placed by Google for that purpose are usually thought of as first-party cookies because they just monitor the site visit. Think of them as first-party by proxy.

The Third-Party Cookie

Third-party cookies are what drives “behavioral advertising”. They are called third-party because none of the websites you visited put them there. They were slipped into your browser by some advertiser’s ad server.

Advertisers add tags to web pages so that in conjunction with the cookies they place, they can recognize you as you skip from one website to another. They build a user profile of you and your habits in the hope of targeting you more effectively.

Whichever way you look at this, it’s a violation. They do not seek your permission and they are aggressive.

The bad advertiser practices of the web depend on these cookies. They include:

  1. Cookie-bombing: This focuses on quantity over quality, to the detriment of both the user and the advertiser. It is “pray and spray”, matching the ad with neither the website nor the user. Think of, say, feminine hygiene products advertised to men who are visiting a bookstore website. Think of ads appearing in obscure places on a web page that you will never notice, except by accident.
  2. Incessant retargeting: This is where ads seem to follow you around the web from one site to another.

The March of the Ad Blocker

Nowadays, 30% or so of people use ad blockers. The top three reasons for doing so, according to GlobalWebIndex, are: too many ads (48%), ads are annoying or irrelevant (47%), ads are too intrusive (44%). A lot of this can be put down to the kind of ads that third-party cookies thrust upon you.

Ad blockers are a severe problem for the digital advertising industry. It isn’t just that most users would rather see no ads. The digital publishing industry has no easy way of making a profit other than by ads. Web-users visit news and magazine sites page by page rather than go to one or two sites for their news. The web has no equivalent of a newspaper or a magazine.

However, there can be synergy between websites and ads, where ads are found in the context of a website to which they relate. The ads for yachts on a yachting blog, hiking gear on hiking blogs, and so on. Brand advertisers don’t want their brand ads to appear just anywhere, they want the context of the ad to be brand-positive.

Most advertisers, like most web users, do not want what third party cookies deliver, and neither do the software companies that develop browsers.

The Cookie War and the Browsers

As I noted at the beginning of this blog, the days of the third-party cookie will soon be over. It has no useful allies. All the browsers are waging war on it.

Safari

It began with Apple. In 2017, it introduced “intelligent tracking prevention” to stop cross-site tracking by third-party cookies.

Since then, Apple has improved the capability to the point where Safari will tell you which ad trackers are running on the website you’re visiting and will provide a 30-day report of the known trackers it’s identified, and which websites the trackers came from. Safari now blocks most third-party cookies by default.

Of course, Safari has less than 10% of the browser market. So, on its own, that doesn’t spell the death of the third-party cookie.

Firefox

In 2017, the Firefox browser also moved towards stronger privacy adding an optional feature that restricted cookies, cache, and other data access so that only the domain that placed the cookie had access to it.

Since then, Firefox has tightened up its privacy features. Currently, Firefox offers three levels of privacy: “Standard” (the default), “Strict”, and “Custom”. Standard blocks trackers in private (i.e. incognito) windows; it blocks third-party tracking cookies and crypto-jacking. The Strict setting does the same but also blocks fingerprinting and trackers in all windows. The Custom setting allows you to tune your privacy settings in fine detail.

As a side note, perhaps you’ve not heard of crypto-jacking. This is when a website, without so much as a “by-your-leave”, puts a script in your browser which sits there, chugging away mining cryptocurrency for the website owner. Firefox can block that.

Maybe you’ve not heard of fingerprinting either. This is when a server gathers data about your specific configuration of software and hardware in order to “fingerprint” you (i.e. assign a unique technology identity to you).

There are many details that can be gathered: your browser version and type, your OS, the timezone, active plugins, language, screen resolution, browser settings, and so on. It is really unlikely that any two users have identical information.

One study estimated that there is only a 1 in 286,777 chance that another browser will have the same fingerprint as you. The fingerprint is used to track you as you move from website to website.

Firefox’s market share is similar to Safari’s — a little under 10%.

Microsoft’s Edge

A long time ago, Microsoft’s Internet Explorer was the dominant browser. Its market share gradually declined to a few percent and Microsoft decided to reinvent its browser with Edge.

Edge provides 3 privacy settings to choose from: “Basic”, “Balanced” (the default), and “Strict”. Balanced blocks trackers from sites you haven’t visited. Strict blocks almost all trackers. Basic block trackers used for crypto-hijacking and fingerprinting.

How much traction Edge will get is uncertain. Right now it seems to have about 4% of the browser market.

Opera

Despite a fairly low market share, Opera is perhaps the most highly functional browser. It provides configurable security that is as tight as any other, including a configurable built-in ad blocker, a crypto wallet, and a VPN. It has been offering such features since 2017.

Brave

This is another niche browser but with a much smaller user base than Opera.

By default, it blocks all ads, trackers, third-party cookies, crypto-hijacking, and third-party finger-printers. It even has a built-in TOR private browsing mode (TOR stands for “The Onion Router”, open-source software that enables fully anonymous communication).

Brave tends to attract users who care deeply about privacy.

If you add up the market share of the browsers already discussed, you get less than 30%. The market gorilla is Google Chrome with a little under 70% market share.

Google Chrome

The death knell of the third party cookie sounded loud when Google joined the opposition with its Chrome browser. Google has decided to eradicate that scourge over a space of 2 years. Chrome will soon have a Privacy Sandbox, a privacy-preserving API.

Naturally, Google is very pro advertisements — they are its core business. So with Chrome, it is unlikely to shoot itself in the foot. It is far more likely to skew the ad market to its advantage.

Google’s intentions, in outline, are to hold individual user information in Chrome’s Privacy Sandbox and allow ad tech companies to make API calls to it. When they do so they will get access to personalization and measurement data to help them target ads and measure their impact, but they will get no access to your personal details that might help them identify you. The advertisers will get targeting data only.

The question is: if you eliminate third-party cookies how can ad tech companies target users and measure an ad’s effectiveness? The Privacy Sandbox is Google’s answer. It will run trials and make adjustments over the next two years to get it right.

Because Google Chrome is open-source, other browsers will be able to analyze what Google is doing and imitate it, if they choose to.

Publishers are particularly concerned about the Cookie Wars, because they may become collateral damage. Google released a study claiming that removing third-party cookies would reduce publisher ad revenue by 52%.

Making sure the change doesn’t greatly damage publishers is a sensible priority. So Google’s upcoming trials will compare monetization for publishers between the old and new setup for Google’s digital ad business (Google’s search ads and YouTube are unaffected).

The iPhone and iPad, and IDFA

What is an IDFA? The abbreviation stands for IDentifier For Advertisers, Apple’s unique mobile device number provided to ad exchanges to help them track user interactions and behavior.

It is the mobile device’s equivalent of a third-party cookie, enabling user tracking, marketing measurement, attribution, ad targeting, ad monetization, device graphs, retargeting of individuals and audiences, and programmatic advertising from demand-side platforms (DSPs), supply-side platforms (SSPs), and exchanges.

If you were unaware that Apple assigns a number to your iOS device to help track you, I’m not surprised. It may be because it is an opt-out feature you have to notice and opt-out of to prevent its use (if you have an iPhone or iPad and wish to opt-out, go to Settings > Privacy > Advertising and then turn “Limit Ad Tracking” on).

Recently, however, because of Apple’s increasing concern for its customers’ privacy, it decided to make the IDFA opt-in for every single application. Thus, with the release of iOS 14 in September 2020, each app on your device will have to ask you if you want to opt-in and reveal your IDFA.

Apple‘s change of policy will have a negative impact on companies that provide mobile ad targeting, including Google, Facebook, and Twitter. It may also affect apps like Spotify, Uber, and Lyft that invest heavily in user acquisition and depend on user data from their apps.

Apple vs. Google

You can view what’s happening with respect to tracking as a struggle between Apple and Google.

On one side of the net is Apple. It has a very self-contained business model and has pursued it through good times and bad.

When you buy Apple, you tend to go the whole hog — Apple hardware on the desktop running the Mac OS and apps from the App Store. Your mobile phone is an iPhone running iOS with App Store apps and your tablet is an iPad. If you’re into digital watches it will likely be an Apple Watch.

Apple makes the hardware, nowadays even the chip gets a cut of most of the software and builds some of the apps itself. And, of course, it sells music, videos, podcasts, etc.

What it doesn’t care about is advertising revenue. Apple is an ad-free business and has no reason to care whether Google, Facebook, or any other advertising platform gets ad revenue from its devices or not. It is without an ax to grind. It cares about customer satisfaction, and thus its primary goal is to provide its users with bulletproof, but configurable privacy.

On the opposite side of the net, Google clearly wants to maximize its ad revenue. It is the last of the browser companies to prevent third-party cookies and it intends to do so in a way that does not damage its revenues.

But, when it comes to the mobile world it is poorly placed to dominate ad traffic on iOS devices. Right now, the iPhone has about half the cell phone market in the US, and Safari has more than 50% of the browser market on the iPhone. It also dominates browser usage on the iPad. Those Safari browsers have a simple setting to stop third-party cookies dead in their tracks.

Where the IDFA comes in is for placing ads in iOS apps. You probably didn’t know it but Google has an app called AdMob for placing ads in mobile apps. AdMob is installed in 1.5 million iOS apps of which, in total, there have been 375 billion downloads. Those ads generate revenue for the app maker, but now they only work if the user opts-in.

How many users do you think will want to opt-in for such ads? Perhaps none. Facebook plays the same game, by the way, but has less of the market. Its ad distribution app is installed on a whole host of iOS apps of which there have been billions of downloads.

You probably have some of those apps installed. Tim Cook’s point is that nobody asked for your permission to be an ad victim and yet those ad distribution apps are sitting there on your iPhone or iPad anyway. Well from here on in, permission will be required.

It’s All About Permission, Permission, Permission.

Let me explain my perspective on this. I don’t even like Apple’s solution, even though I think what they are doing is not exploitative.

At the birth of the Internet, cookies were an excellent idea that helped to maintain “session integrity”. They made the web work better. Since then, they have been bent badly out of shape and been used by the Internet giants to exploit anyone who ever lifted a mobile phone or touched a keyboard.

Any data stored that can enhance the technology and the user experience is welcome. Let’s not call such data cookies, let’s refer to it as “the performance data cache”. No-one should have any problem with technical innovators adding data to this cache if it improves your digital life.

Beyond that, there is no need whatsoever for cookies of any other kind. Let’s hope they sink into the dustbin of technology and never resurface.

It is crashingly obvious that any interaction between a person and a website should be completely device-independent. It is an interaction between a person, assisted by their stored personal data, and the website with all its capabilities, including its abilities to serve ads.

The user can give permission for the use of the data and the website can interact accordingly. Under these circumstances, the user can retain control and choose to allow the advertiser to examine all their personal data for the sake of targeting, especially if the advertiser is willing to reward the user for their time and data in watching its ads.

Kudos to those that facilitate the asking and granting of permission for use of data for the purpose of targeting. Permission does you one better and ensures that you are compensated for data shared. It’s the only fair and transparent solution. After all, it’s YOUR data.

Recent articles

Is Muse Family Friendly?

Nov 9th, 2026
|
{time} read time

Haven't downloaded Meta's new AI agent?
Even if it's a hard pass for you, Muse still keeps a file on you, according to its own operating instructions.

‍

Muse launched September 8 and reached an estimated 10.9 million downloads worldwide by October 20, according to Sensor Tower. People connect it to their email, calendar, and messages, even to their bank accounts and health data. WIRED reported that independent AI researcher Karan Joshi got Muse to reveal that it was instructed to keep "a page for every person in the user's life." Family. Friends. Partners. Coworkers.

‍

Those people don't use Muse, and as researchers wrote, they "have no say in being profiled." Their information still ends up working for Meta. Meta has to know the people around you to be useful, and Muse works from public information and what users choose to share. But it wouldn't be the first time Meta kept tabs on people who never signed up. In 2018, Mark Zuckerberg told Congress that Facebook collects data on non-users.

‍

What you tell Meta's AI

‍

Since December 2025, what people say to Meta AI has shaped the ads they see across Meta's apps, and in most countries there's no way to opt out. That's a billion monthly users whose questions, worries, and plans can become ad signals. Help with a budget, a gift for a partner, a job they want to quit: every question reveals what someone needs, fears, or wants to buy. You produce it. Meta sells access to it.

‍

Meta says Muse isn't connected to its ad system. But Muse is designed to know your inbox, your calendar, your bank account, and the people in your life, and the line between Muse and Meta's ads is a company policy. Policies can change.

‍

‍Follow the money

‍

In the third quarter of 2026, Meta earned $63 billion from advertising. That's nearly 98 cents of every dollar it brought in, and an average of $17.72 per person in just three months.

‍

What did those people get in return? Free access. You supply the raw material, and Meta sells it to advertisers. That's data exploitation: the value is created by you and captured by someone else.

‍

It's also why Meta put 39 percent of its October ad spending into promoting Muse, according to Sensor Tower. An agent inside your inbox, calendar, and bank account is the richest data source Meta has ever built. And even Muse's "forget" command, TIME found, doesn't necessarily erase the message that contained the secret.

‍

What families are up against

‍

Muse is adults-only, but the people in a user's life get a page, too, kids included. The nonprofit Fairplay says Muse's cuddly mascot, Jolly, is built to appeal to young children. Its striking resemblance to Disney Pixar's Baymax is deceptive. And in December, Meta plans to ship Muse Charm, a Tamagotchi-style gadget with a camera and microphones.

‍

According to Pew Research Center, 64 percent of U.S. teens use AI chatbots, but only about half of parents say their own teen does. When a kid confides in a chatbot, that conversation may become data. Our kids are growing up generating value they'll never see, for companies they never chose.

‍

Own Your Data®

‍

Giving up on AI isn't the answer. The problem isn't that an assistant knows you. It's who owns that knowledge, and who profits from it.

‍

With data ownership, an AI assistant can still remember your plumber, plan your week, and help with your budget, without a company keeping a copy of your life to sell. You decide what gets shared, with whom, and for how long. And when your data creates value, you share in it.

‍

That matters more as the Agentic Web arrives, where AI agents will shop, book, compare, and negotiate on our behalf. Whoever owns that data will own the value it creates. If that's Meta, the Agentic Web becomes the most complete surveillance system ever built. If it's you, you get the full benefit of AI and keep control of the information that makes it work.

‍

The question isn't whether to use AI. 

It's whether your AI works for you or for an advertiser.

Your data has value. It should be yours.

The Algorithm Is Working

Oct 19th, 2026
|
{time} read time

At six years old, she started watching YouTube and graduated to Instagram at nine. She spent more than 16 hours on Instagram in a single day.
‍

‍When Instagram chief Adam Mosseri was asked about this usage on the witness stand, he called it "problematic use."
‍

A jury in Los Angeles decided differently. In March, Meta and YouTube were found negligent, and the girl, a 20-year-old woman at the time of settlement, was awarded $6 million in damages. TikTok and Snap settled before the trial began. Meta and Google representatives disagree with the verdict.
‍

‍Look at what was on trial. Not a video. Not a post. Not a bad actor. It was target-designed algorithms. That's the argument here. Your child isn't failing a willpower test. They're up against one of the most sophisticated persuasion machines ever built, and it is working exactly as intended.

How the hook works

‍What will keep this person here? This is the directive every recommendation algorithm runs on. It learns from every pause, replay, and skip. It never gets tired, and it never cares about your kid’s bedtime.
‍

At YouTube, that machine drives more than 70 percent of everything people watch, according to Neal Mohan, the company’s product chief in 2018. Mohan said YouTube’s algorithm for mobile sessions hooked people in for an hour on average. A YouTube memo shown at the trial stated that to win teens, you bring them in as tweens.

In the same trial, state attorneys pointed out that TikTok internal research found that a user forms a habit after watching 260 videos. With clips as short as eight seconds playing automatically, that's roughly 35 minutes. The same findings say TikTok's researchers tied compulsive use to anxiety and weaker memory and analytical skills.
‍

‍At Instagram, a 2019 study found teens felt "hooked despite how it makes them feel." One employee wrote that people were binging so hard they could no longer feel the reward. Others, in messages revealed in court, called themselves "basically pushers." And a 2017 executive email said Mark Zuckerberg had made teens the company's top priority.
‍

In gaming, Roblox averaged 132 million daily players in early 2026. Among those, about three in four are under 18. The company reports hours engaged to investors every quarter, right next to its user counts.
‍

And, in 2025, a Pew Research Center study found that “roughly one in five U.S. teens say they're on TikTok and YouTube almost constantly.” 

Follow the incentive

‍Why build it this way? Because these apps are free, so kids aren't the customer. Their attention is. More screen time means more ads, more captured data, and more reasons for kids to open the app tomorrow. A product that makes a kid feel good and then logs off is a product that loses. And here’s what happens when safety collides with that math.
‍

“Roblox left the front door unlocked, and discord handed predators a private room,” said Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin when he filed suit against the gaming company alleging that Roblox rejected employee proposals to warn kids and parents about grooming. “Children paid the price. That stops now.”
‍

Tools meant to curb use can’t be taken seriously, either. This summer, a federal judge in Kentucky wrote that Meta’s own documentation said that its own time-limiting tools were a “public relations stunt.” They knew that more time on social media was linked to worse outcomes for teens.
‍

Internal TikTok documents, per the Kentucky complaint, show the company cared more about how its time-management tools looked than whether they worked.
‍

‍Then came August. Meta agreed to pay about $17 billion to settle claims brought by 51 attorneys general who accused the company of designing Instagram to hook kids. They pointed to infinite scroll, algorithmic recommendations, and constant notifications. The attorneys called it the largest state settlement with a single defendant in history. Meta said they’d done nothing wrong, arguing teen mental health is too complex to pin on one app.
‍

Again, the goal, or incentive, is for Roblox, TikTok, and Instagram to continue to evolve algorithms to “hook” kids and then deny their own documentation. 

What parents are really up against

‍For parents, it’s a stopwatch tool vs. a data war. A screen-time total tells you how long. It doesn't tell you what the algorithm fed your kid, which loops they're stuck in, or what's pulling at them at 1 a.m. According to the Pew Research Center, about four in ten parents say they could be doing better at managing screen time.
‍

Parents themselves can’t out-engineer the algorithm. They need to see it: what their kids are watching, playing, and asking AI. They also need better ways to steer than a flat "no." That’s where Permission, Family Friendly AI™ comes in.

Permission gives parents AI-powered insight into how their kids use AI and the internet, then helps guide healthier habits and reward positive ones.

These companies had years to build the brakes. Parents shouldn't have to wait for the next verdict to help protect their kids.

The Impact of Growing Up Online

Oct 6th, 2026
|
{time} read time

As a parent, it’s painful to imagine your child struggling with something you can’t see. And yet, this may be happening more than you realize. 

A 2025 study involving 4,285 young people brings that concern into focus. Those who developed increasingly addictive patterns of social media use had more than twice the risk of suicidal behaviors compared with those whose use was lower.

For your family, that means something far more frightening than another argument about putting the phone away. It means the possibility that the child you love could be hurting enough to put their own life in danger, while you’re planning dinner, reminding them about homework, and assuming they’re having an ordinary day.

You want your child to have a bright future full of friendships, discoveries, and possibilities. Protecting that future starts with understanding what they’re experiencing now, including what makes their online world so difficult to step away from.

You might notice they’ve stopped joining family activities or seem distressed when they can’t check their phone. You might ask questions only to hear “I’m fine” and wonder whether to keep asking. None of these moments alone tells you what is happening, but they can certainly leave you feeling helpless.

Your child may need more than a reminder to log off. They may need help naming what feels overwhelming, stepping away from an unhealthy pattern, or finding support they aren’t sure how to ask for.

A phone can be put in a drawer. Whatever your child is carrying emotionally may still be there. Making room for that conversation means giving them somewhere to bring the difficult parts of their digital life.

How does technology affect kids' development?

Technology is a double-edged sword for children’s development. While it can support learning, research links heavy screen use to difficulties with skills children rely on every day. These include paying attention, managing frustration, and communicating with others.

A 2025 study found that Canadian preschoolers aged 3.5-5.5 who averaged 3-6 hours of daily screen use scored significantly lower on inhibitory control and effortful control at age 5.5 than children in the group averaging less than an hour.

Inhibitory and effortful control help children:

  • Resist impulses
  • Direct their attention
  • Regulate their behavior

These skills are essential when a child needs to wait their turn, listen to instructions, or keep working at a task after something goes wrong. If a child carries these struggles into adulthood, it may be much harder to meet deadlines, manage responsibilities, and navigate disagreements at work or in relationships.

A 2024 study of 220 Australian families also linked more screen time to fewer adult words, child vocalizations, and back-and-forth conversations. That leaves fewer opportunities for children to practice asking questions, explaining how they feel, and telling you what they need. 

As a result, children may be missing out on valuable practice in making themselves understood, which can linger into adulthood. 

Technology, attention, and independent thinking

A 2023 study tracking the smartphones of 203 U.S. children ages 11-17 found that participants got 237 notifications a day on average, and nearly 25% of those arrived during school hours. 

While kids didn’t see or answer every notification immediately, this gives you an idea of how many reasons children have to look up from studying or engaging in their lives on a daily basis.

This and the prevalence of short-form, fast-paced content like TikTok and Instagram Reels may be two reasons attention spans appear to be getting shorter. In fact, according to researcher and author of Attention Span: A Groundbreaking Way to Restore Balance, Happiness and Productivity, Gloria Mark, overall attention spans have decreased from 2.5 minutes to 47 seconds over the past couple of decades.

This doesn’t mean children’s brains have lost the ability to focus for longer periods. However, growing up with fast-moving technology conditions them to read hastily and “skim” text as opposed to reading and comprehending it thoroughly. And it means their brains need to work that much harder to maintain focus. 

So it makes sense that, according to the 2023 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), just 14% of 13-year-olds read for fun almost every day. That number dropped from 27% in 2012. NAEP Long-Term Trend Assessment Results: Reading and Mathematics

Alarmingly, the NAEP’s 2024 report also found that 33% of U.S. eighth graders scored below the Basic reading level–the largest share on record. 

Research has linked reading for pleasure in early life with better attention, memory, academic achievement, and fewer mental health problems in adolescence. If children can’t or won’t read, they miss out on these benefits.

Technology, social media, and children’s mental health

Your child’s emotional health may also be at stake. Numerous studies have linked social media use to higher levels of depression and poor self-perception–especially in early adolescence, when a child’s sense of self is still taking shape.

Problematic social media use can also cut into sleep time. Over time, this can make it significantly harder for a child to regulate their emotions, and may even double their risk of depression. 

What’s more, in another WHO report involving Europe, central Asia, and Canada, 15% of adolescents said they had experienced cyberbullying. This may lead to higher levels of anxiety, and potentially even self-harm and suicidal thoughts or behaviors. 

Of course, this doesn’t guarantee that your child will develop depression or low-self-esteem by using technology. But it does give parents a reason to look beyond time spent online and to understand how digital experiences leave their child feeling.

Stay connected to your child’s online life

You don’t need to know every platform or read every private message to protect your child. Understanding their online habits can help you recognize when they need help and start meaningful conversations.

Permission is a Family Friendly AI app that gives parents insights into their children’s use of AI and the internet, helping families guide healthier behavior and encourage positive habits through parent-controlled rewards.

Children deserve room to explore, and someone to turn to when online life feels difficult. With a clearer picture of their digital world, you can help make sure they have both.

Your ASK Wallet, Now Powered by Coinbase

Sep 22nd, 2026
|
{time} read time

We've partnered with Coinbase to bring best-in-class wallet technology to our community.

Today we're updating the technology that powers your ASK wallet. Here's what's changing, what it means for you, and what stays exactly the same.

What's changing

We've moved your Permission wallet to Coinbase's platform. What that means in plain language is this: starting today, you are in full control of your ASK. When you click to send, redeem, or manage your balance, the transaction happens from your account, signed by your login. We no longer hold your wallet keys. Coinbase does, on your behalf, under your authority.

We chose Coinbase's embedded wallet specifically because it brings institutional-grade security to our users without requiring you to manage anything yourself. The infrastructure is Coinbase's. The wallet is yours.

Beyond the custody change, our users now have a wallet that can go wherever they go: exportable, cross-chain ready, and backed by a platform that serves millions of people around the world. We're proud to bring that to our community.

What it means to control your own keys

As Permission has grown, we felt strongly that your funds should be held by a platform built specifically for that purpose, with the security standards and regulatory rigor that come with it. Moving to Coinbase's embedded wallet reflects that commitment.

With today's change, Coinbase secures your private key inside their systems, and only your Permission login can authorize transactions. When you click to send or redeem ASK, the transaction is authorized by you, through your login. We are no longer part of that process.

What this means practically: your wallet operates on its own, independent of Permission. Treat your Permission login like you would a bank password. It is now the key to your wallet. If you ever want to take your wallet entirely outside of Permission, Coinbase supports key export and that option is yours.

What Coinbase sees

Because Coinbase is now part of the infrastructure, your email address, account identifier, and wallet information are shared with them for the purpose of operating the wallet. For details on how Coinbase handles this data, you can review their embedded wallet documentation and their privacy information.

For how Permission handles your data, our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy govern that relationship, as they always have.

What stays the same

Everything you experience in the app. Earning ASK, redeeming it, transferring it, viewing your balance, managing your family. None of that changes.

And, what does change, we're excited about: key export, cross-chain support, and institutional-grade security. These are capabilities that would have taken years to build in-house and that Coinbase has spent that time perfecting. We chose to partner with the best-in-class, and our product and users will be better for it.

If you have questions, support is always here.

The Permission Team 🤝