Submit
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Back to Blog

What Are Cookies? Types, Uses, & Why They’re Crumbling

October 21, 2020
|
Read time {time} min
Written by
Permission
Stay in the loop

Get the latest insights, product updates, and news from Permission — shaping the future of user-owned data and AI innovation.

Subscribe

It’s the end of the road for third-party cookies—and that’s a good thing.

Perhaps you don’t know what third party cookies are. Let’s begin by explaining why cookies exist at all.

What Is a Cookie?

A cookie is a parcel of data stored in the browser to speed-up and simplify interactions between the browser and a website it is connected to. Any data can be stored in a cookie.

How Do Cookies Work?

The browser provides a place where websites can store data when that website is being accessed, and the browser stores it. The idea was invented by Lou Montulli of Netscape Communications in 1994, the year that the Web was born.

The problem was that a PC could disconnect from a website for many reasons: the PC or the website might crash or the internet could disconnect. So the website cookie could store your identity data, your preferences, and maybe even session information. Then, if anything failed you could restart near to where you left off.

Since then things have become more complex and there are several different types of cookie, as follows.

The Different Types of Internet Cookies

The Session Cookie

These are temporary cookies that last only for the duration of a session. They tend to store mundane data like login credentials and usually evaporate when you reboot the computer or close the browser. They can also be used to help with website performance like ensuring fast page loads.

There’s unlikely to be anything objectionable stored in these cookies.

The Persistent Cookie

Websites that plant these cookies in your browser usually give them an expiration date, which could be any time from seconds to years.

You know you have a persistent identity cookie if you are on a website and reboot your computer only to discover when you return to the website that you are still logged in.

Such cookies are commonly used to track your on-site behavior and to tailor your user experience.

There is unlikely to be anything objectionable about these cookies either.

The Secure Cookie

These cookies assist with encryption and hence are definitely good guys. They are only transmitted securely (via HTTPS) and they are used to implement security on banking and shopping websites.

They keep your financial details secret but allow the site to remember those details.

The First-Party Cookie

All the above are examples of first-party cookies. Technically first-party simply means that it’s a two-way arrangement between you and the website. However, many websites monitor website traffic with help from external vendors, particularly Google with Google Analytics.

The cookies placed by Google for that purpose are usually thought of as first-party cookies because they just monitor the site visit. Think of them as first-party by proxy.

The Third-Party Cookie

Third-party cookies are what drives “behavioral advertising”. They are called third-party because none of the websites you visited put them there. They were slipped into your browser by some advertiser’s ad server.

Advertisers add tags to web pages so that in conjunction with the cookies they place, they can recognize you as you skip from one website to another. They build a user profile of you and your habits in the hope of targeting you more effectively.

Whichever way you look at this, it’s a violation. They do not seek your permission and they are aggressive.

The bad advertiser practices of the web depend on these cookies. They include:

  1. Cookie-bombing: This focuses on quantity over quality, to the detriment of both the user and the advertiser. It is “pray and spray”, matching the ad with neither the website nor the user. Think of, say, feminine hygiene products advertised to men who are visiting a bookstore website. Think of ads appearing in obscure places on a web page that you will never notice, except by accident.
  2. Incessant retargeting: This is where ads seem to follow you around the web from one site to another.

The March of the Ad Blocker

Nowadays, 30% or so of people use ad blockers. The top three reasons for doing so, according to GlobalWebIndex, are: too many ads (48%), ads are annoying or irrelevant (47%), ads are too intrusive (44%). A lot of this can be put down to the kind of ads that third-party cookies thrust upon you.

Ad blockers are a severe problem for the digital advertising industry. It isn’t just that most users would rather see no ads. The digital publishing industry has no easy way of making a profit other than by ads. Web-users visit news and magazine sites page by page rather than go to one or two sites for their news. The web has no equivalent of a newspaper or a magazine.

However, there can be synergy between websites and ads, where ads are found in the context of a website to which they relate. The ads for yachts on a yachting blog, hiking gear on hiking blogs, and so on. Brand advertisers don’t want their brand ads to appear just anywhere, they want the context of the ad to be brand-positive.

Most advertisers, like most web users, do not want what third party cookies deliver, and neither do the software companies that develop browsers.

The Cookie War and the Browsers

As I noted at the beginning of this blog, the days of the third-party cookie will soon be over. It has no useful allies. All the browsers are waging war on it.

Safari

It began with Apple. In 2017, it introduced “intelligent tracking prevention” to stop cross-site tracking by third-party cookies.

Since then, Apple has improved the capability to the point where Safari will tell you which ad trackers are running on the website you’re visiting and will provide a 30-day report of the known trackers it’s identified, and which websites the trackers came from. Safari now blocks most third-party cookies by default.

Of course, Safari has less than 10% of the browser market. So, on its own, that doesn’t spell the death of the third-party cookie.

Firefox

In 2017, the Firefox browser also moved towards stronger privacy adding an optional feature that restricted cookies, cache, and other data access so that only the domain that placed the cookie had access to it.

Since then, Firefox has tightened up its privacy features. Currently, Firefox offers three levels of privacy: “Standard” (the default), “Strict”, and “Custom”. Standard blocks trackers in private (i.e. incognito) windows; it blocks third-party tracking cookies and crypto-jacking. The Strict setting does the same but also blocks fingerprinting and trackers in all windows. The Custom setting allows you to tune your privacy settings in fine detail.

As a side note, perhaps you’ve not heard of crypto-jacking. This is when a website, without so much as a “by-your-leave”, puts a script in your browser which sits there, chugging away mining cryptocurrency for the website owner. Firefox can block that.

Maybe you’ve not heard of fingerprinting either. This is when a server gathers data about your specific configuration of software and hardware in order to “fingerprint” you (i.e. assign a unique technology identity to you).

There are many details that can be gathered: your browser version and type, your OS, the timezone, active plugins, language, screen resolution, browser settings, and so on. It is really unlikely that any two users have identical information.

One study estimated that there is only a 1 in 286,777 chance that another browser will have the same fingerprint as you. The fingerprint is used to track you as you move from website to website.

Firefox’s market share is similar to Safari’s — a little under 10%.

Microsoft’s Edge

A long time ago, Microsoft’s Internet Explorer was the dominant browser. Its market share gradually declined to a few percent and Microsoft decided to reinvent its browser with Edge.

Edge provides 3 privacy settings to choose from: “Basic”, “Balanced” (the default), and “Strict”. Balanced blocks trackers from sites you haven’t visited. Strict blocks almost all trackers. Basic block trackers used for crypto-hijacking and fingerprinting.

How much traction Edge will get is uncertain. Right now it seems to have about 4% of the browser market.

Opera

Despite a fairly low market share, Opera is perhaps the most highly functional browser. It provides configurable security that is as tight as any other, including a configurable built-in ad blocker, a crypto wallet, and a VPN. It has been offering such features since 2017.

Brave

This is another niche browser but with a much smaller user base than Opera.

By default, it blocks all ads, trackers, third-party cookies, crypto-hijacking, and third-party finger-printers. It even has a built-in TOR private browsing mode (TOR stands for “The Onion Router”, open-source software that enables fully anonymous communication).

Brave tends to attract users who care deeply about privacy.

If you add up the market share of the browsers already discussed, you get less than 30%. The market gorilla is Google Chrome with a little under 70% market share.

Google Chrome

The death knell of the third party cookie sounded loud when Google joined the opposition with its Chrome browser. Google has decided to eradicate that scourge over a space of 2 years. Chrome will soon have a Privacy Sandbox, a privacy-preserving API.

Naturally, Google is very pro advertisements — they are its core business. So with Chrome, it is unlikely to shoot itself in the foot. It is far more likely to skew the ad market to its advantage.

Google’s intentions, in outline, are to hold individual user information in Chrome’s Privacy Sandbox and allow ad tech companies to make API calls to it. When they do so they will get access to personalization and measurement data to help them target ads and measure their impact, but they will get no access to your personal details that might help them identify you. The advertisers will get targeting data only.

The question is: if you eliminate third-party cookies how can ad tech companies target users and measure an ad’s effectiveness? The Privacy Sandbox is Google’s answer. It will run trials and make adjustments over the next two years to get it right.

Because Google Chrome is open-source, other browsers will be able to analyze what Google is doing and imitate it, if they choose to.

Publishers are particularly concerned about the Cookie Wars, because they may become collateral damage. Google released a study claiming that removing third-party cookies would reduce publisher ad revenue by 52%.

Making sure the change doesn’t greatly damage publishers is a sensible priority. So Google’s upcoming trials will compare monetization for publishers between the old and new setup for Google’s digital ad business (Google’s search ads and YouTube are unaffected).

The iPhone and iPad, and IDFA

What is an IDFA? The abbreviation stands for IDentifier For Advertisers, Apple’s unique mobile device number provided to ad exchanges to help them track user interactions and behavior.

It is the mobile device’s equivalent of a third-party cookie, enabling user tracking, marketing measurement, attribution, ad targeting, ad monetization, device graphs, retargeting of individuals and audiences, and programmatic advertising from demand-side platforms (DSPs), supply-side platforms (SSPs), and exchanges.

If you were unaware that Apple assigns a number to your iOS device to help track you, I’m not surprised. It may be because it is an opt-out feature you have to notice and opt-out of to prevent its use (if you have an iPhone or iPad and wish to opt-out, go to Settings > Privacy > Advertising and then turn “Limit Ad Tracking” on).

Recently, however, because of Apple’s increasing concern for its customers’ privacy, it decided to make the IDFA opt-in for every single application. Thus, with the release of iOS 14 in September 2020, each app on your device will have to ask you if you want to opt-in and reveal your IDFA.

Apple‘s change of policy will have a negative impact on companies that provide mobile ad targeting, including Google, Facebook, and Twitter. It may also affect apps like Spotify, Uber, and Lyft that invest heavily in user acquisition and depend on user data from their apps.

Apple vs. Google

You can view what’s happening with respect to tracking as a struggle between Apple and Google.

On one side of the net is Apple. It has a very self-contained business model and has pursued it through good times and bad.

When you buy Apple, you tend to go the whole hog — Apple hardware on the desktop running the Mac OS and apps from the App Store. Your mobile phone is an iPhone running iOS with App Store apps and your tablet is an iPad. If you’re into digital watches it will likely be an Apple Watch.

Apple makes the hardware, nowadays even the chip gets a cut of most of the software and builds some of the apps itself. And, of course, it sells music, videos, podcasts, etc.

What it doesn’t care about is advertising revenue. Apple is an ad-free business and has no reason to care whether Google, Facebook, or any other advertising platform gets ad revenue from its devices or not. It is without an ax to grind. It cares about customer satisfaction, and thus its primary goal is to provide its users with bulletproof, but configurable privacy.

On the opposite side of the net, Google clearly wants to maximize its ad revenue. It is the last of the browser companies to prevent third-party cookies and it intends to do so in a way that does not damage its revenues.

But, when it comes to the mobile world it is poorly placed to dominate ad traffic on iOS devices. Right now, the iPhone has about half the cell phone market in the US, and Safari has more than 50% of the browser market on the iPhone. It also dominates browser usage on the iPad. Those Safari browsers have a simple setting to stop third-party cookies dead in their tracks.

Where the IDFA comes in is for placing ads in iOS apps. You probably didn’t know it but Google has an app called AdMob for placing ads in mobile apps. AdMob is installed in 1.5 million iOS apps of which, in total, there have been 375 billion downloads. Those ads generate revenue for the app maker, but now they only work if the user opts-in.

How many users do you think will want to opt-in for such ads? Perhaps none. Facebook plays the same game, by the way, but has less of the market. Its ad distribution app is installed on a whole host of iOS apps of which there have been billions of downloads.

You probably have some of those apps installed. Tim Cook’s point is that nobody asked for your permission to be an ad victim and yet those ad distribution apps are sitting there on your iPhone or iPad anyway. Well from here on in, permission will be required.

It’s All About Permission, Permission, Permission.

Let me explain my perspective on this. I don’t even like Apple’s solution, even though I think what they are doing is not exploitative.

At the birth of the Internet, cookies were an excellent idea that helped to maintain “session integrity”. They made the web work better. Since then, they have been bent badly out of shape and been used by the Internet giants to exploit anyone who ever lifted a mobile phone or touched a keyboard.

Any data stored that can enhance the technology and the user experience is welcome. Let’s not call such data cookies, let’s refer to it as “the performance data cache”. No-one should have any problem with technical innovators adding data to this cache if it improves your digital life.

Beyond that, there is no need whatsoever for cookies of any other kind. Let’s hope they sink into the dustbin of technology and never resurface.

It is crashingly obvious that any interaction between a person and a website should be completely device-independent. It is an interaction between a person, assisted by their stored personal data, and the website with all its capabilities, including its abilities to serve ads.

The user can give permission for the use of the data and the website can interact accordingly. Under these circumstances, the user can retain control and choose to allow the advertiser to examine all their personal data for the sake of targeting, especially if the advertiser is willing to reward the user for their time and data in watching its ads.

Kudos to those that facilitate the asking and granting of permission for use of data for the purpose of targeting. Permission does you one better and ensures that you are compensated for data shared. It’s the only fair and transparent solution. After all, it’s YOUR data.

Get the Agent

Unlock the value of your online experience.

Recent articles

Insights

Online Safety and the Limits of AI Moderation: What Parents Can Learn from Roblox

Nov 10th, 2025
|
{time} read time

Roblox isn’t just a game — it’s a digital playground with tens of millions of daily users, most of them children between 9 and 15 years old.

For many, it’s the first place they build, chat, and explore online. But as with every major platform serving young audiences, keeping that experience safe is a monumental challenge.

Recent lawsuits and law-enforcement reports highlight how complex that challenge has become. Roblox reported more than 13,000 cases of sextortion and child exploitation in 2023 alone — a staggering figure that reflects not negligence, but the sheer scale of what all digital ecosystems now face.

The Industry’s Safety Challenge

Most parents assume Roblox and similar platforms are constantly monitored. In reality, the scale is overwhelming: millions of messages, interactions, and virtual spaces every hour. Even the most advanced AI moderation systems can miss the subtleties of manipulation and coded communication that predators use.

Roblox has publicly committed to safety and continues to invest heavily in AI moderation and human review — efforts that deserve recognition. Yet as independent researcher Ben Simon (“Ruben Sim”) and others have noted, moderation at this scale is an arms race that demands new tools and deeper collaboration across the industry.

By comparison, TikTok employs more than 40,000 human moderators — over ten times Roblox’s reported staff — despite having roughly three times the daily active users. The contrast underscores a reality no platform escapes: AI moderation is essential, but insufficient on its own.

When Games Become Gateways

Children as young as six have encountered inappropriate content, virtual strip clubs, or predatory advances within user-generated spaces. What often begins as a friendly in-game chat can shift into private messages, promises of Robux (Roblox’s digital currency), or requests for photos and money.

And exploitation isn’t always sexual. Many predators use financial manipulation, convincing kids to share account credentials or make in-game purchases on their behalf.

For parents, Roblox’s family-friendly design can create a false sense of security. The lesson is not that Roblox is unsafe, but that no single moderation system can substitute for parental awareness and dialogue.

Even when interactions seem harmless, kids can give away more than they realize.

A name, a birthday, or a photo might seem trivial, but in the wrong hands it can open the door to identity theft.

The Hidden Threat: Child Identity Theft

Indeed, a lesser-known but equally serious risk is identity theft.

When children overshare personal details — their full name, birthdate, school, address, or even family information — online or with strangers, that data can be used to impersonate them.

Because minors rarely have active financial records, child identity theft often goes undetected for years, sometimes until they apply for a driver’s license, a student loan, or their first job. By then, the damage can be profound: financial loss, credit score damage, and emotional stress. Restoring a stolen identity can require years of effort, documentation, and legal action.

The best defense is prevention.

Teach children early why their personal information should never be shared publicly or in private chats — and remind them that real friends never need to know everything about you to play together online.

AI Moderation Needs Human Partnership

AI moderation remains reactive.

Algorithms flag suspicious language, but they can’t interpret tone, hesitation, or the subtle erosion of boundaries that signals grooming.

Predators evolve faster than filters, which means the answer isn’t more AI for the platform, but smarter AI for the family.

The Limits of Centralized AI

The truth is, today’s moderation AI isn’t really designed to protect people; it’s designed to protect platforms. Its job is to reduce liability, flag content, and preserve brand safety at scale. But in doing so, it often treats users as data points, not individuals.

This is the paradox of centralized AI safety: the bigger it gets, the less it understands.

It can process millions of messages a second, but not the intent behind them. It can delete an account in a millisecond, but can’t tell whether it’s protecting a child or punishing a joke.

That’s why the future of safety can’t live inside one corporate algorithm. It has to live with the individual — in personal AI agents that see context, respect consent, and act in the user’s best interest. Instead of a single moderation brain governing millions, every family deserves an AI partner that watches with understanding, not suspicion.

A system that exists to protect them, not the platform.

The Future of Child Safety: Collaboration, Not Competition

The Roblox story underscores an industry-wide truth: safety can’t be one-size-fits-all.
Every child’s online experience is different and protecting it requires both platform vigilance and parent empowerment.

At Permission, we believe the next generation of online safety will come from collaboration, not competition. Instead of replacing platform systems, our personal AI agents complement them — giving parents visibility and peace of mind while supporting the broader ecosystem of trust that companies like Roblox are working to build.

From one-size-fits-all moderation to one-AI-per-family insight — in harmony with the platforms kids already love.

Each family’s AI guardian can learn their child’s unique patterns, highlight potential risks across apps, and summarize activity in clear reports that parents control. That’s what we mean by ethical visibility — insight without invasion.

You can explore this philosophy further in our upcoming piece:
➡️ Monitoring Without Spying: How to Build Digital Trust With Your Child (link coming soon)

What Parents Can Do Now

Until personalized AI guardians are widespread, families can take practical steps today:

  • Talk early and often. Make online safety part of everyday conversation.

  • Ask, don’t accuse. Curiosity builds trust; interrogation breeds secrecy.

  • Play together. Experience games and chat environments firsthand.

  • Set boundaries collaboratively. Agree on rules, timing, and social norms.

  • Teach red flags. Encourage your child to tell you when something feels wrong — without fear of punishment.

A Shared Responsibility

The recent Roblox lawsuits remind all of us just how complicated parenting in the digital world can feel. It’s not just about rules or apps: it’s about guiding your kids through a space that changes faster than any of us could have imagined! 

And the truth is, everyone involved wants the same thing: a digital world where kids can explore safely, confidently, and with the freedom to just be kids.

At Permission, we’re committed to building an AI that understands what matters, respects your family’s values and boundaries, and puts consent at the center of every interaction.

Announcements

Meet the Permission Agent: The Future of Data Ownership

Sep 10th, 2025
|
{time} read time

For years, Permission has championed a simple idea: your data has value, and you deserve to be rewarded for it. Our mission is clear: to enable individuals to own their data and be compensated when it’s used. Until now, we’ve made that possible through our opt-in experience, giving you the choice to engage and earn.

But the internet is evolving, and so are we.

Now, with the rise of AI, our vision has never been more relevant. The world is waking up to the fact that data is the fuel driving digital intelligence, and individuals should be the ones who benefit directly from it.

The time is now. AI has created both the urgency and the infrastructure to finally make our vision real. The solution is the "Permission Agent: The Personal AI that Pays You."

What is the Permission Agent?

The Permission Agent is your own AI-powered digital assistant - it knows you, works for you, and turns your data into a revenue stream.

Running seamlessly in your browser, it manages your consent across the digital world while identifying the moments when your data has value, making sure you are the one who gets rewarded.

In essence, it acts as your personal representative in the online economy, constantly spotting opportunities, securing your rewards, and giving you back control of your digital life.

Human data powers the next generation of AI, and for it to be trusted it must be verified, auditable, and permissioned. Most importantly, it must reward the people who provide it. With the Permission Agent, this vision becomes reality: your data is safeguarded, your consent is respected, and you are compensated every step of the way.

This is more than a seamless way to earn. It’s a bold step toward a future where the internet is rebuilt around trust, transparency, and fairness - with people at the center.

Passive Earning and Compounded Referral Rewards

With the Permission Agent, earning isn’t just smarter - it’s continuous and always working in the background. As you browse normally, your Agent quietly unlocks opportunities and secures rewards on your behalf.

Beyond this passive earning, the value multiplies when you invite friends to Permission. Instead of a one-time referral bonus, you’ll earn a percentage of everything your friends earn, for life. Each time they browse, engage, and collect rewards, you benefit too — and the more friends you bring in, the greater your earnings become.

All rewards are paid in $ASK, the token that powers the Permission ecosystem. Whether you choose to redeem, trade for cash or crypto, or save and accumulate, the more you collect, the more value you unlock.

Changes to Permission Platform

Our mission has always been to create a fair internet - one where people truly own their data and get rewarded for it. The opt-in experience was an important first step, opening the door to a world where individuals could engage and earn. But now it’s time to evolve.

Effective October 1st, the following platform changes will be implemented:

  • Branded daily offers will no longer appear in their current form.  
  • The Earn Marketplace will be transformed into Personalize Your AI - a new way to earn by taking actions that help your Agent better understand you, bringing you even greater personalization and value.
  • The browser extension will be the primary surface for earning from your data, and, should you choose to activate passive earning, you’ll benefit from ongoing rewards as your Agent works for you in the background.

With the Permission Agent, you gain a proactive partner that works for you around the clock — unlocking rewards, protecting your data, and ensuring you benefit from every opportunity,  without needing to constantly make manual decisions.

How to Get Started

Getting set up takes just a few minutes:

  1. Download the Permission Agent (browser extension)

  2. Activate it to claim your ASK token bonus

  3. Browse as usual — your Agent works in the background to find earning opportunities for you

The more you use it, the more it learns how to unlock rewards and maximize the value of your time online.

A New Era of the Internet

This isn’t just a new tool - it’s a turning point.

The Permission Agent marks the beginning of a digital world where people truly own their data, decide when and how to share it, and are rewarded every step of the way.

Insights

Web5 and the Age of AI: Why It’s Time to Own Your Data

Jun 25th, 2025
|
{time} read time

The Internet Wasn’t Built for You

The internet has always promised more than it delivered. Web1 gave us access. Web2 gave us interactivity. Web3 introduced decentralization.

But none of them fully delivered on the promise of giving users actual control over their identity and data. Each iteration has made technical strides, but has often traded one form of centralization for another. The early internet was academic and open but difficult to use. Web2 simplified access and enabled user-generated content, but consolidated power within a handful of massive platforms. Web3 attempted to shift control back to individuals, but in many cases it only replaced platform monopolies with protocol monopolies, often steered by investors rather than users.

This brings us to the newest proposal in the evolution of the internet: Web5. It is not simply a new version number. It is an entirely new architecture and a philosophical reset. Web5 is not about adding features to the existing internet. It is about reclaiming its original promise: a digital environment where people are the primary stakeholders and where privacy, data ownership, and user autonomy are fundamental principles rather than afterthoughts.

What Is Web5?

Web5 is a proposed new iteration of the internet that emphasizes user sovereignty, decentralized identity, and data control at the individual level. The term was introduced by TBD, a division of Block (formerly Square), led by Jack Dorsey. The concept merges the usability and familiarity of Web2 with the decentralization aims of Web3, but seeks to go further by eliminating dependencies on centralized platforms, third-party identities, and even the token-centric incentives common in the Web3 space.

At the heart of Web5 is a recognition that true decentralization cannot exist unless individuals can own and manage their identity and data independently of the platforms and applications they use. Web5 imagines a future where your digital identity is yours alone and cannot be revoked, sold, or siloed by anyone else. Your data lives in a secure location you control, and you grant or revoke access to it on your terms.

In essence, Web5 is not about redesigning the internet from scratch. It is about rewriting its relationship with the people who use it.

The Building Blocks of Web5

Web5 is built on several core components that enable a truly user-centric and decentralized experience. These include:

Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs)

DIDs are globally unique identifiers created, owned, and controlled by individuals. Unlike traditional usernames, email addresses, or OAuth logins, DIDs are not tied to any centralized provider. They are cryptographic identities that function independently of any specific platform.

In Web5, your DID serves as your universal passport. You can use it to authenticate yourself across different services without having to create new accounts or hand over personal data to each provider. More importantly, your DID is yours alone. No company or platform can take it away from you, lock you out, or monetize it without your permission.

Verifiable Credentials (VCs)

Verifiable credentials are digitally signed claims about a person or entity. Think of them as secure, cryptographically verifiable versions of driver’s licenses, university degrees, or customer loyalty cards.

These credentials are stored in a user’s own digital wallet and are linked to their DID. They can be presented to other parties as needed, without requiring a centralized intermediary. For example, instead of submitting your passport to a website for identity verification, you could present a VC that confirms your citizenship status or age, verified by an issuer you trust.

This reduces the need for repetitive, invasive data collection and helps prevent identity theft, fraud, and data misuse.

Decentralized Web Nodes (DWNs)

DWNs are user-controlled data stores that operate in a peer-to-peer manner. They serve as both storage and messaging layers, allowing individuals to manage and share their data without relying on centralized cloud infrastructure.

In practice, this means that your messages, files, and personal information live on your own node. Applications can request access to specific data from your DWN, and you decide whether to grant or deny that request. If you stop using the app or no longer trust it, you simply revoke access. Your data stays with you.

DWNs make it possible to separate data from applications. This creates a clear boundary between ownership and access and transforms the way digital services are designed.

Decentralized Web Apps (DWAs)

DWAs are applications that run in a web environment but operate differently than traditional apps. Instead of storing user data in their own back-end infrastructure, DWAs are designed to request and interact with data that resides in a user’s DWN.

This architectural shift changes the power dynamic between users and developers. In Web2, developers collect and control your data. In Web5, they build applications that respond to your data preferences. The app becomes a guest in your ecosystem, not the other way around.

Web5 vs. Web3: A Clearer Distinction

While Web3 and Web5 share some vocabulary, they differ significantly in their goals and structure.

Web3 has been a meaningful step toward decentralization, particularly in finance and asset ownership. However, it often recreates centralization through the influence of early investors, reliance on large protocols, and opaque governance structures. Web5 aims to eliminate these dependencies altogether.

Why Web5 Matters in a Post-Privacy Era

Data privacy is no longer a niche concern. It is a mainstream issue affecting billions of people. From the fallout of the Cambridge Analytica scandal to the enactment of global privacy regulations like GDPR and CPRA, there is a growing consensus that the existing digital model is broken.

Web5 does not wait for regulatory pressure to enforce ethical practices. It bakes them into the infrastructure. By placing individuals at the center of data ownership and removing the need for constant surveillance-based monetization, Web5 allows for the creation of a digital ecosystem that respects boundaries, preferences, and consent by design.

In a world where AI is increasingly powered by massive data collection, Web5 offers a powerful counterbalance. It allows individuals to decide whether their data is included in training models, marketing campaigns, or platform personalization strategies.

How AI Supercharges the Promise of Web5

Artificial intelligence is rapidly reshaping every part of the internet — from the way content is generated to how decisions are made about what we see, buy, and believe. But the power behind AI doesn’t come from the models themselves. It comes from the data they’re trained on.

Today, that data is often taken without consent. Every click, view, scroll, and purchase becomes raw material for algorithms, enriching platforms while users are left with no control and no compensation.

This is where Web5 comes in.

By combining the decentralization goals of Web3 with the intelligence of AI, Web5 offers a blueprint for a more ethical digital future — one where individuals decide how their data is used, who can access it, and whether it should train an AI at all. In a Web5 world, your data lives in your own vault, tied to your decentralized identity. You can choose to share it, restrict it, or even monetize it.

That’s the real promise: an internet that respects your privacy and pays you for your data.

Rather than resisting AI, Web5 gives us a way to integrate it responsibly. It ensures that intelligence doesn’t come at the cost of autonomy — and that the next era of the internet is built around consent, not extraction.

The Role of Permission.io in the Web5 Movement

At Permission.io, we have always believed that individuals should benefit from the value their data creates. Our platform is built around the idea of earning through consent. Web5 provides the technological framework that aligns perfectly with this philosophy.

We do not believe that privacy and innovation are mutually exclusive. Instead, we believe that ethical data practices are the foundation of a more effective, sustainable, and human-centered internet. That is why our $ASK token allows users to earn rewards for data sharing in a transparent, voluntary manner.

As Web5 standards evolve, we will continue to integrate its principles into our ecosystem. Whether through decentralized identity, personal data vaults, or privacy-first interfaces, Permission.io will remain at the forefront of giving users control and compensation in a world driven by AI and data.

Conclusion: The Internet Is Growing Up

The internet is entering its fourth decade. Its adolescence was defined by explosive growth, centralization, and profit-first platforms. Its adulthood must be defined by ethics, sovereignty, and resilience.

Web5 is not just a concept. It is a movement toward restoring balance between platforms and people. It challenges developers to build differently. It invites users to reclaim their autonomy. And it sets a precedent for how we should think about identity, ownership, and trust in a digitally saturated world.

Web5 is not inevitable. It is a choice. But it is a choice that more people are ready to make.

Own Your Data. Build the Future.

Permission.io is proud to be a participant in the new internet—one where you are not the product, but the owner. If you believe that the future of the internet should be user-driven, privacy-first, and reward-based, you are in the right place.

Start earning with Permission.


Protect your identity.


Take control of your data in Web5 and the age of AI.

Insights

AI Has a Data Problem. Identic AI Has the Fix.

May 15th, 2025
|
{time} read time

Artificial Intelligence is advancing faster than anyone imagined. But underneath the innovation lies a fundamental problem: it runs on stolen data.

Your personal searches, clicks, purchases, and habits have been quietly scraped, repackaged, and monetized, all without your consent. Big Tech built today’s most powerful AI systems on a mountain of behavioral data that users never agreed to give. It’s efficient, yes. But it’s also broken.

Identic AI offers a new path. A vision of artificial intelligence that doesn’t exploit you, but respects you. One where privacy, accuracy, and transparency aren’t afterthoughts…they’re the foundation.

The Current Landscape of AI

AI is reshaping industries at breakneck speed. From advertising to healthcare to finance, algorithms are optimizing everything, including targeting, diagnostics, forecasting, and more. We are witnessing smarter search, personalized shopping, and hyper-automated digital experiences.

But what powers all of this intelligence? The answer is simple: data. Every interaction, swipe, and search adds fuel to the machine. The smarter AI gets, the more it demands. And that’s where the cracks begin to show.

The Data Problem in AI

Most of today’s AI models are trained on data that was never truly given. It is scraped from websites, logged from apps, and extracted from your online behavior without explicit consent. Then it is bought, sold, and resold with zero transparency and zero benefit to the person who created it.

This system isn’t just flawed; it is exploitative. The very people generating the data are left out of the value chain. Their information powers billion-dollar innovations, while they are kept in the dark.

Identic AI: A New Paradigm for Ethical AI

Identic AI is a concept that reimagines the foundation of artificial intelligence. Instead of running on unconsented data, it operates on permissioned information, which is data that users have explicitly agreed to share.

It’s powered by zero-party data, voluntarily and transparently contributed by individuals. This creates not only a more ethical system, but a smarter one. Data shared intentionally is often more accurate, more contextual, and more valuable.

Identic AI ensures transparency from end to end. Users know exactly what they’re sharing, how it’s being used, and what they gain in return.

How Identic AI Solves Major AI Challenges

Privacy Compliance
Identic AI is designed to align with global privacy laws like GDPR and CCPA. Instead of retrofitting compliance, it begins with consent by default.

Trust and Transparency
It eliminates the "black box" dynamic. Users can see how their data is used to train and fuel AI models, which restores confidence in the process.

Data Accuracy
Willingly shared data is more reliable. When users understand the purpose, they provide better inputs, which leads to better outputs.

Fair Compensation
Identic AI proposes a model where data contributors are no longer invisible. They are participants, and they are rewarded for their contributions.

The Future with Identic AI

Imagine a digital world where every interaction is a clear value exchange. Where people aren't just data points but stakeholders. Where AI systems respect boundaries instead of bypassing them.

Identic AI sets the precedent for this future. It proves that artificial intelligence can be powerful without being predatory. Performance and ethics are not mutually exclusive; they are mutually reinforcing.

How Permission Powers the Identic AI Movement

At Permission.io, we’re building the infrastructure to bring this model to life. Our platform enables users to earn ASK tokens in exchange for sharing data, with full knowledge, full control, and full transparency.

We’re laying the groundwork for AI systems that run on consent, not coercion. Our mission is to create a more equitable internet, where users don’t just use technology. They benefit from it.

Your Data. Your Terms. Your Share of the AI Economy.

If you’re tired of giving your data away for free, join a platform that puts you back in control.

Sign up at Permission.ai and start earning with every click, every search, and every insight you choose to share.