Submit
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Back to Blog

Fiat Currency 101: History, Examples, Pros/Cons, and Future

October 2, 2020
|
Read time {time} min
Written by
Permission
Stay in the loop

Get the latest insights, product updates, and news from Permission — shaping the future of user-owned data and AI innovation.

Subscribe

Fiat currency is government-issued and government-backed legal tender which is not linked to the value of anything physical like gold, silver, or even copper.

Perhaps you’d like to call it: I-can’t-believe-it’s-actually-money, money.

If you read The Bible in Latin—I bet you don’t—on the first page in the third verse of Genesis, you run across the words “fiat lux,” meaning “let there be light.”  Armed with this information you can deduce that the term “fiat currency” literally means “let there be currency.”

This widely-used term first saw the light of day in the book, “Fiat Money Inflation in France” published in 1875. It was an academic work written by Andrew Dickson White, the American historian, and co-founder of Cornell University.

At the time the book was written, there was a running debate about the nature of money. Andrew White chose the words “fiat currency” to describe money which has no intrinsic value. If you’ve never studied the subject, you’ll be surprised by how many different things that have value of themselves have been used as money at various times. Of course, it’s true of gold and silver coins, but it’s also true of beaver pelts (used as currency in New France, now part of Canada) and cigarettes (used as currency for over two years in post-WW2 Germany).

Surprisingly, cowry shells proved popular for many centuries. They were used as currency in ancient China, so much so that Classical Chinese character for “money/currency”, 貝, is believed to be a pictograph of a cowrie shell. And because cowries occur near the shores of almost all countries that border the Indian ocean, they were used as money in India and African countries that border that ocean.

The Birth of Paper Money

So, something qualifies as real money if it has “intrinsic” value—beaver pelts, cigarettes, and cowries were regarded as valuable by the peoples who accepted them as money, just as gold and silver were.

The Chinese invented paper money, some time in the Tang Dynasty (618-907 AD), and used engraved wooden blocks to print it. They gradually became increasingly sophisticated in financial activities, developing credit mechanisms—merchants began to use promissory notes (credit notes) for long-distance trade. During the Song Dynasty (960-1276) merchants were invited to deposit their coins with the Government Treasury in exchange for “flying money” (Fey-thsian).

Curiously, the motivation for flying money wasn’t a desire to inflate the money supply. It was done because China was running out of coins. This is a money-supply problem we rarely hear of now, but it often plagued coin-based economies. Some merchants issued private drafts (banknotes in effect) that were backed by coins and salt, and later on by gold and silver. In 1024, the government took sole control of issuing these notes.

Then, during the Yuan Dynasty (1279-1367), paper money was declared to be the only legal tender. The paper money experiment began to go badly wrong during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644). New notes were introduced into circulation without withdrawing older notes. Monetary inflation followed, as naturally as night follows day. In 1380, one Chinese guan was worth 1000 copper coins, by 1535, its value had reduced to 0.28 copper coins.

What Is Inflation?

It is worth pointing out here that the word “inflation” in a financial context is often misunderstood by people to mean “rising prices.” That is not its meaning. It means precisely “an increase in the supply of money.” Rising prices are a possible, but not guaranteed, result of inflating the money supply.

If you increase the supply of money, but that new money ends up with people who choose never to spend it, it will not cause prices to rise. Prices will rise only if the money circulates. And prices can rise for other reasons—a poor harvest will raise the price of grain without any help from an inflated money supply.

A Tale of Two Cities

Europe lagged China by centuries in the use of paper money, which didn’t get going until the printing press had been invented. The idea was tried in Sweden in 1661 by Stockholm’s Banco, linking banknotes directly to deposits of coins. The bank then foolishly printed more notes than there were deposits. It went bankrupt after three years. At about the same time, the goldsmith-bankers in London began creating notes linked to deposits, but they were conservative in issuing them. These proved to be a prototype for a national currency.

In 1694 the English government established the Bank of England, printing notes that guaranteed access to an amount of silver. But it wasn’t until 1745 that it issued fixed denomination notes from £20 to £1,000—the first true British banknotes.

While London moved slowly, Paris moved quickly, under the influence of the Scottish economist, John Law. He was an original economic thinker and a historically influential one. He invented the scarcity theory of value—a model for the interaction between supply and demand. He wrote the Real Bills Doctrine, which considers the required relationship between bank assets and liabilities and which set the foundation for modern banking. He believed that monetary inflation would stimulate an economy—and it does in the short term. But that opinion led to his downfall.

Law was also a successful gambler with a good understanding of probability. It was his gambling skills that brought him to the attention of the French aristocracy and his economic ideas that persuaded the Duke of Orleans to appoint him as Controller General of Finances of France.

When John Law took charge, France was in a financial mess. Louis XIV’s War of the Spanish Succession had left France in economic distress. The economy was stagnant and the national debt was crippling. A shortage of precious metals caused a shortage of coins in circulation.

Law’s solution was to replace gold with paper credit and then gradually increase the supply of credit. He believed this would stimulate commerce, and thus help to reduce the national debt. He intended to replace the national debt with shares in prosperous economic ventures.

To cut a long story short, Law issued bank notes based on gold coins combined in a 1 to 3 ratio with defunct government bonds, inflating the currency by a factor of 3 from the get-go. He then provoked a speculative bubble by founding the Mississippi Company, a monopoly trading company. The company’s stock rose by 60 times its initial value and then collapsed causing French citizens to dump their paper money for coins. When that happened, he was shown the door.

Real Paper Money: The Gold Standard

By the nineteenth century, the phenomenon of paper money inflation was better understood. John Law’s disastrous French experiment proved to be an object lesson and a highly effective deterrent. The faith in coinage (gold and silver) was even enshrined in the US constitution, where Article 1, Section 10 states:

“[No State shall] make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;”

From 1837 to 1863, a period of 26 years, the US had no central banks, just heavily regulated state-chartered banks that issued banknotes against specie (precious-metal-based coinage). Then, with the National Banking Act of 1863, a system of national banks was established with the intent of creating a uniform national currency and paying for the Union’s civil war costs.

Wars are costly. The US issued “Greenback” dollars that were not backed by precious metals to pay for it. But in a series of legislative changes, which began in 1873, the US gradually moved to a gold standard with all bank notes backed by gold.

The British had been operating a gold standard since 1844, and much of the British Empire naturally fell in line. In 1873, Germany adopted the gold standard and France followed suit. Throughout the 19th-century, banknotes backed by gold gradually superseded gold and silver coinage.

A gold standard emerged. It prevented undisciplined and inflationary money-printing and it reduced the need for coins. It also enforced a fixed exchange rate between currencies, facilitating global trade. Because currency was exchangeable for gold, gold naturally migrated to the more successful economies, increasing the money supply in accordance with the national balance of trade.

What’s not to love?

Gold does not provide a perfect basis for a commodity-backed currency, but, historically, it has proved to be the best choice. Currently, the world’s above-ground gold stock grows by 1 to 2% annually. About half the gold in existence is used for jewelry, about 20% is owned by central banks, a further 20% by private investors, and the remainder is employed industrially. The neat thing about gold is that it isn’t destroyed by usage; almost all industrially used gold is recovered and recycled.

The glitches in gold-based currencies happen with discoveries of significant new deposits. But this is rare. It happened when Spain raided the Aztecs and the Incas for gold, and as a result of the California gold rush of 1849, the Australian gold rush of 1851, and the Witwatersrand gold rush of 1886. It would require a truly dramatic new gold find to increase the existing stock of gold significantly.

There are currently about 190,000 tonnes of mined gold, with an estimated 54,000 tonnes still below ground. Most of those 190,000 tonnes are more recent than you might imagine. Two-thirds of it has been mined since 1950.

The Rocky Road to Fiat Currency

The question is: why did the gold standard fail?

But it’s the wrong question. The gold standard didn’t fail; it worked. The intention with the gold standard was to prevent the debasement of paper currency by making it exchangeable with something that couldn’t be debased: gold. All the evidence suggests that it works, even allowing for the disruption imposed by the occasional major gold discovery.

Paper money that is linked directly to gold—something that cannot be inflated by fiat, is not fiat money. Paper money becomes fiat money when the link between the paper and the gold is cut.

In the first decade of the twentieth century, the major economies of the world had moved their currencies to implement a gold standard. Then came the wars – without money, you cannot fight them. And the easiest way to pay for them is in fiat money because you can print it without it becoming immediately obvious to your citizens. The economists could not object—losing the war will be far worse economically than a dose of inflation.

After World War I, only the US truly remained on the gold standard. Other countries tried to go back to it, but the Great Depression foiled that.

In 1934, the US Congress passed the Gold Reserve Act, which nationalized all gold by ordering Federal Reserve banks to turn over their physical gold to the U.S. Treasury. In return, the banks received gold certificates to be used as reserves against deposits and Federal Reserve notes. The act authorized the president to devalue the gold-linked dollar, which he quickly did. This bumped the gold value of the dollar from $20.67 to $35 per ounce, a devaluation of over 40%.

The effect was to allow the Federal Reserve to print money in the hope of combatting rampant deflation. That’s right, deflation rather than inflation!!

The Force of Deflation

The money supply can expand as well as contract. If paper money is printed and it circulates, then in general prices will rise. However, when an economy goes into recession or a depression, many people and businesses are no longer able to pay their debts. An unpaid debt is money that disappears. The usual way to combat such a contraction of the money supply is to print money and make it available to the banks so that they remain solvent.

This is the other side of the coin, as regards fiat money. Not only does fiat money make inflation possible, it also makes deflation possible. Neither of those is good for the health of an economy.

At the end of World War II, another very expensive war, which only the US survived with its economy intact, a new international standard for currencies was implemented, that went by the name of Bretton Woods.

The idea was that countries would fix their exchange rate against the US dollar and would be able to exchange their dollar holdings for gold at the official exchange rate of $35 per ounce whenever they so wished. Neither businesses nor individuals were allowed to do that, so convertibility was highly constrained. Depriving individuals of owning gold (except for jewelry) removed a great deal of liquidity from the market and thus helped to stabilize the dollar price of gold.

So the US dollar then became the world’s primary reserve currency—the currency that countries and large businesses needed to hold to conduct international trade. They held dollars for the same reason that people and companies once held gold coins: as a common currency. The dollar was suitable because of its link to gold, and all countries could swap their dollar holdings for gold whenever they wished.

This worked very well until it didn’t.

Starting in 1959 and continuing for over a decade, France decided to continuously exchange its dollar reserves for gold at the official rate. In the latter part of the 1960s, the US was spending heavily on the Vietnam War and was running a persistent balance of payments deficit. Eventually, the US was obliged to cut the deficits or cut the link to gold.

President Nixon chose the latter—on August 15, 1971, the US abandoned the convertibility of the US dollar to gold.

And Then There Was Fiat

It is a remarkable fact that for the last 50 years no currencies in the world have had any intrinsic value. They are nothing more than paper, no matter which country you live in. And few people care.

The only thing that is backing the US dollar is faith that the US government will support it and maintain the current system of currency exchange across the markets of the world. However, this system favors the US. It remains to be seen whether the dominance of the dollar will be challenged.

What Could Challenge It?

Why, cryptocurrencies, of course. Currencies that can be designed to be proof against the twin systemic threats of inflation and deflation.

Explore the Permission Platform

Unlock the value of your online experience.

Light gradient background transitioning from white to pale green with a subtle grainy texture.

Recent articles

Insights

Parenting In the Age of AI: Why Tech Is Making Parenting Harder – and What Parents Can Do

Jan 29th, 2026
|
{time} read time

Many parents sense a shift in their children’s environment but can’t quite put their finger on it.

Children aren't just using technology. Conversations, friendships, and identity formation are increasingly taking place online - across platforms that most parents neither grew up with nor fully understand. 

Many parents feel one step behind and question: How do I raise my child in a tech world that evolves faster than I can keep up with?

Why Parenting Feels Harder in the Digital Age

Technology today is not static. AI-driven and personalized platforms adapt faster than families can.

Parents want to raise their children to live healthy, grounded lives without becoming controlling or disconnected. Yet, many parents describe feeling:

  • “Outpaced by the evolution of AI and Algorithms”
  • “Disconnected from their children's digital lives”
  • “Concerned about safety when AI becomes a companion”
  • “Frustrated with insufficient traditional parental controls”

Research shows this shift clearly:

  • 66% of parents say parenting is harder today than 20 years ago, citing technology as a key factor. 
  • Reddit discussions reveal how parents experience a “nostalgia gap,”  in which their own childhoods do not resemble the digital worlds their children inhabit.
  • 86% of parents set rules around screen use, yet only about 20% follow these rules consistently, highlighting ongoing tension in managing children’s device use.

Together, these findings suggest that while parents are trying to manage technology, the tools and strategies available to them haven’t kept pace with how fast digital environments evolve.

Technology has made parenting harder.

The Pressure Parents Face Managing Technology

Parents are repeatedly being told that managing their children's digital exposure is their responsibility.

The message is subtle but persistent: if something goes wrong, it’s because “you didn’t do enough.”

This gatekeeper role is an unreasonable expectation. Children’s online lives are always within reach, embedded in education, friendships, entertainment, and creativity. Expecting parents to take full control overlooks the reality of modern childhood, where digital life is constant and unavoidable.

This expectation often creates chronic emotional and somatic guilt for parents. At the same time, AI-driven platforms are continuously optimized to increase engagement in ways parents simply cannot realistically counter.

As licensed clinical social worker Stephen Hanmer D'Eliía explains in The Attention Wound: What the attention economy extracts and what the body cannot surrender, "the guilt is by design." Attention-driven systems are engineered to overstimulate users and erode self-regulation (for children and adults alike). Parents experience the same nervous-system overload as their kids, while lacking the benefit of growing up with these systems. These outcomes reflect system design, not parental neglect.

Ongoing Reddit threads confirm this reality. Parents describe feeling behind and uncertain about how to guide their children through digital environments they are still learning to understand themselves. These discussions highlight the emotional and cognitive toll that rapidly evolving technology places on families.

Parenting In A Digital World That Looks Nothing Like The One We Grew Up In

Many parents instinctively reach for their own childhoods as a reference point but quickly realize that comparison no longer works in today’s world.  Adults remember life before smartphones; children born into constant digital stimulation have no such baseline.

Indeed, “we played outside all day” no longer reflects the reality of the world children are growing up in today. Playgrounds are now digital. Friendships, humor, and creativity increasingly unfold online.

This gap leaves parents feeling unqualified. Guidance feels harder when the environment is foreign, especially when society expects and insists you know how.

Children Are Relying on Chatbots for Emotional Support Over Parents

AI has crossed a threshold: from tool to companion.

Children are increasingly turning to chatbots for conversation and emotional support, often in private.

About one-in-ten parents with children ages 5-12 report that their children use AI chatbots like ChatGPT or Gemini. They ask personal questions, share worries, and seek guidance on topics they feel hesitant to discuss with adults.

Many parents fear that their child may rely on AI first instead of coming to them. Psychologists warn that this shift is significant because AI is designed to be endlessly available and instantly responsive (ParentMap, 2025).

Risks include:

  • Exposure to misinformation.
  • Emotional dependency on systems that can simulate care but cannot truly understand or respond responsibly.
  • Blurred boundaries between human relationships and machine interaction.

Reporting suggests children are forming emotionally meaningful relationships with AI systems faster than families, schools, and safeguards can adapt (Guardian, 2025; After Babel, 2025b)

Unlike traditional tools, AI chatbots are built for constant availability and emotional responsiveness, which can blur boundaries for children still developing judgment and self-regulation — and may unintentionally mirror, amplify, or reinforce negative emotions instead of providing the perspective and limits that human relationships offer.

Why Traditional Parental Controls are Failing

Traditional parental controls were built for an “earlier internet,” one where parents could see and manage their children online. Today’s internet is algorithmic.

Algorithmic platforms bypass parental oversight by design. Interventions like removing screens or setting limits often increase conflict, secrecy, and addictive behaviors rather than teaching self-regulation or guiding children on how to navigate digital spaces safely (Pew Research, 2025; r/Parenting, 2025).

A 2021 JAMA Network study found video platforms popular with kids use algorithms to recommend content based on what keeps children engaged, rather than parental approval. Even when children start with neutral searches, the system can quickly surface videos or posts that are more exciting. These algorithms continuously adapt to a child’s behavior, creating personalized “rabbit holes” of content that change faster than any screen-time limit or parental control can manage.

Even the most widely used parental control tools illustrate this limitation in practice, focusing on: 

  • reacting after exposure (Bark)
  • protecting against external risks (Aura)
  • limiting access (Qustodio)
  • tracking physical location (Life360)

What they largely miss is visibility into the algorithmic systems and personalized feeds that actively shape children’s digital experiences in real time.

A Better Approach to Parenting in the Digital Age

In a world where AI evolves faster than families can keep up, more restrictions won’t solve the disconnection between parents and children. Parents need tools and strategies that help them stay informed and engaged in environments they cannot fully see or control.

Some companies, like Permission, focus on translating digital activity into clear insights, helping parents notice patterns, understand context, and respond thoughtfully without prying.

Raising children in a world where AI moves faster than we can keep up is about staying present, understanding the systems shaping children’s digital lives, and strengthening the human connection that no algorithm can replicate.

What Parents Can Do in a Rapidly Changing Digital World

While no single tool or rule can solve these challenges, many parents ask what actually helps in practice.

Below are some of the most common questions parents raise — and approaches that research and lived experience suggest can make a difference.

Do parents need to fully understand every app, platform, or AI tool their child uses?

No. Trying to keep up with every platform or feature often increases stress without improving outcomes.

What matters more is understanding patterns: how digital use fits into a child’s routines, moods, sleep, and social life over time. Parents don’t need perfect visibility into everything their child does online; they need enough context to notice meaningful changes and respond thoughtfully.

What should parents think about AI tools and chatbots used by kids?

AI tools introduce a new dynamic because they are:

  • always available
  • highly responsive
  • designed to simulate conversation and support

This matters because children may turn to these tools privately, for curiosity, comfort, or companionship. Rather than reacting only to the technology itself, parents benefit from understanding how and why their child is using AI, and having age-appropriate conversations about boundaries, trust, and reliance.

How can parents stay involved without constant monitoring or conflict?

Parents are most effective when they can:

  • notice meaningful shifts early
  • understand context before reacting
  • talk through digital choices rather than enforce rules after the fact

This shifts digital parenting from surveillance to guidance. When children feel supported rather than watched, conversations tend to be more open, and conflict is reduced.

What kinds of tools actually support parents in this environment?

Tools that focus on insight rather than alerts, and patterns rather than isolated moments, are often more helpful than tools that simply report activity after something goes wrong.

Some approaches — including platforms like Permission — are designed to translate digital activity into understandable context, helping parents notice trends, ask better questions, and stay connected without hovering. The goal is to support parenting decisions, not replace them.

The Bigger Picture

Parenting in the age of AI isn’t about total control, and it isn’t about stepping back entirely.

It’s about helping kids:

  • develop judgment
  • understand digital influence
  • build healthy habits
  • stay grounded in human relationships

As technology continues to evolve, the most durable form of online safety comes from understanding, trust, and connection — not from trying to surveil or outpace every new system.

Project Updates

How You Earn with the Permission Agent

Jan 28th, 2026
|
{time} read time

The Permission Agent was built to do more than sit in your browser.

It was designed to work for you: spotting opportunities, handling actions on your behalf, and making it super easy to earn rewards as part of your everyday internet use. 

Here’s how earning works with the Permission Agent.

Earning Happens Through the Agent

Earning with Permission is powered by Agent-delivered actions designed to support the growth of the Permission ecosystem.

Rewards come through Rewarded Actions and Quick Earns, surfaced directly inside the Agent. When you use the Agent regularly, you’ll see clear, opt-in earning opportunities presented to you.

Importantly, earning is no longer based on passive browsing. Instead, opportunities are delivered intentionally through actions you choose to participate in, with rewards disclosed upfront.

You don’t need to search for offers or manage complex workflows. The Agent organizes opportunities and helps carry out the work for you.

Daily use is how you discover what’s available.

Rewarded Actions and Quick Earns

Rewarded Actions and Quick Earns are the primary ways users earn ASK through the Agent.

These opportunities may include:

  • Supporting Permission launches and initiatives
  • Participating in community programs or campaigns
  • Sharing Permission through guided promotional actions
  • Taking part in contests or time-bound promotions

All opportunities are presented clearly through the Agent, participation is always optional, and rewards are transparent.

The Agent Does the Work

What makes earning different with Permission is the Agent itself.

You choose which actions to participate in, and the Agent handles execution - reducing friction while keeping you in control. Instead of completing repetitive steps manually, the Agent performs guided tasks on your behalf, including mechanics behind promotions and referrals.

The result: earning ASK feels lightweight and natural because the Agent handles the busywork.

The more consistently you use the Agent, the more opportunities you’ll see.

Referrals and Lifetime Rewards

Referrals remain one of the most powerful ways to earn with Permission.

When you refer someone to Permission:

  • You earn when they become active
  • You continue earning as their activity grows
  • You receive ongoing rewards tied to the value created by your referral network

As your referrals use the Permission Agent, it becomes easier for them to discover earning opportunities - and as they earn more, so do you.

Referral rewards operate independently of daily Agent actions, allowing you to build long-term, compounding value.

Learn more here:
👉 Unlock Rewards with the Permission Referral Program

What to Expect Over Time

As the Permission ecosystem grows, earning opportunities will expand.

You can expect:

  • New Rewarded Actions and Quick Earns delivered through the Agent
  • Campaigns tied to community growth and product launches
  • Opportunities ranging from quick wins to more meaningful rewards

Checking in with your Agent regularly is the best way to stay up to date.

Getting Started

Getting started takes just a few minutes:

  1. Install the Permission Agent
  2. Sign in and activate it
  3. Use the Agent daily to see available Rewarded Actions and Quick Earns

From there, the Agent takes care of the rest - helping you participate, complete actions, and earn ASK over time.

Built for Intentional Participation

Earning with the Permission Agent is designed to be clear, intentional, and sustainable.

Rewards come from choosing to participate, using the Agent regularly, and contributing to the growth of the Permission ecosystem. The Agent makes that participation easy by handling the work - so value flows back to you without unnecessary effort.

Insights

2026: The Year of Disruption – Trust Becomes the Most Valuable Commodity

Jan 23rd, 2026
|
{time} read time

Moore’s Law is still at work, and in many ways it is accelerating.

AI capabilities, autonomous systems, and financial infrastructure are advancing faster than our institutions, norms, and governance frameworks can absorb. For that acceleration to benefit society at a corresponding rate, one thing must develop just as quickly: trust.

2026 will be the year of disruption across markets, government, higher education, and digital life itself. In every one of those domains, trust becomes the premium asset. Not brand trust. Not reputation alone. But verifiable, enforceable, system-level trust.

Here’s what that means in practice.

1. Trust Becomes Transactional, not Symbolic

Trust between agents won’t rely on branding or reputation alone. It will be built on verifiable exchange: who benefits, how value is measured, and whether compensation is enforceable. Trust becomes transparent, auditable, and machine-readable.

2. Agentic Agents Move from Novelty to Infrastructure

Autonomous, goal-driven AI agents will quietly become foundational internet infrastructure. They won’t look like apps or assistants. They will operate continuously, negotiating, executing, and learning across systems on behalf of humans and institutions.

The central challenge will be trust: whether these agents are acting in the interests of the humans, organizations, and societies they represent, and whether that behavior can be verified.

3. Agent-to-Agent Interactions Overtake Human-Initiated Ones

Most digital interactions in 2026 won’t start with a human click. They will start with one agent negotiating with another. Humans move upstream, setting intent and constraints, while agents handle execution. The internet becomes less conversational and more transactional by design.

4. Agent Economies Force Value Exchange to Build Trust

An economy of autonomous agents cannot run on extraction if trust is to exist.

In 2026, value exchange becomes mandatory, not as a monetization tactic, but as a trust-building mechanism. Agents that cannot compensate with money, tokens, or provable reciprocity will be rate-limited, distrusted, or blocked entirely.

“Free” access doesn’t scale in a defended, agent-native internet where trust must be earned, not assumed.

5. AI and Crypto Converge, with Ethereum as the Coordination Layer

AI needs identity, ownership, auditability, and value rails. Crypto provides all four. In 2026, the Ethereum ecosystem emerges as the coordination layer for intelligent systems exchanging value, not because of speculation, but because it solves real structural problems AI cannot solve alone.

6. Smart Contracts Evolve into Living Agreements

Static smart contracts won’t survive an agent-driven economy. In 2026, contracts become adaptive systems, renegotiated in real time as agents perform work, exchange data, and adjust outcomes. Law doesn’t disappear. It becomes dynamic, executable, and continuously enforced.

7. Wall Street Embraces Tokenization

By 2026, Wall Street fully embraces tokenization. Stocks, bonds, options, real estate interests, and other financial instruments move onto programmable rails.

This shift isn’t about ideology. It’s about efficiency, liquidity, and trust through transparency. Tokenization allows ownership, settlement, and compliance to be enforced at the system level rather than through layers of intermediaries.

8. AI-Driven Creative Destruction Accelerates

AI-driven disruption accelerates faster than institutions can adapt. Entire job categories vanish while new ones appear just as quickly.

The defining risk isn’t displacement. It’s erosion of trust in companies, labor markets, and social contracts that fail to keep pace with technological reality. Organizations that acknowledge disruption early retain trust. Those that deny it lose legitimacy.

9. Higher Education Restructures

Higher education undergoes structural change. A $250,000 investment in a four-year degree increasingly looks misaligned with economic reality. Companies begin to abandon degrees as a default requirement.

In their place, trust shifts toward social intelligence, ethics, adaptability, and demonstrated achievement. Proof of capability matters more than pedigree. Continuous learning matters more than static credentials.

Institutions that understand this transition retain relevance. Those that don’t lose trust, and students.

10. Governments Face Disruption From Systems They Don’t Control

AI doesn’t just disrupt industries. It disrupts governance itself. Agent networks ignore borders. AI evolves faster than regulation. Value flows escape traditional jurisdictional controls.

Governments face a fundamental choice: attempt to reassert control, or redesign systems around participation, verification, and trust. In 2026, adaptability becomes a governing advantage.

Conclusion

Moore’s Law hasn’t slowed. It has intensified. But technological acceleration without trust leads to instability, not progress.

2026 will be remembered as the year trust became the scarce asset across markets, government, education, and digital life.

The future isn’t human versus AI.

It’s trust-based systems versus everything else.

Insights

Raise Kids Who Understand Data Ownership, Digital Assets, and Online Safety

Jan 6th, 2026
|
{time} read time
Online safety for kids has become more complex as AI systems, data tracking, and digital platforms increasingly shape what children see, learn, and engage with.

Parents today are navigating a digital world that looks very different from the one they grew up in.

Families Are Parenting in a World That Has Changed

Kids today don’t just grow up with technology. They grow up inside it.

They learn, socialize, explore identity, and build lifelong habits across apps, games, platforms, and AI-driven systems that operate continuously in the background. At the same time, parents face less visibility, more complexity, and fewer tools that genuinely support understanding without damaging trust.

For many families, this creates ongoing tension:

  • conflict around screens
  • uncertainty about what actually matters
  • fear of missing something important
  • a sense that digital life is moving faster than parenting tools have evolved

Research reflects this shift clearly:

  • 81% of parents worry their children are being tracked online.
  • 72% say AI has made parenting more stressful.
  • 60% of teens report using AI tools their parents don’t fully understand.

The digital world has changed parenting. Families need support that reflects this new reality.

The Reality Families Are Facing Online

Online safety today involves far more than blocking content or limiting screen time.

Parents are navigating:

  • Constant, multi-platform engagement, where behavior forms across apps, games, and feeds rather than in one place
  • Early exposure to adult content, scams, manipulation, and persuasive design, often before kids understand intent or risk
  • AI-driven systems shaping what kids see, learn, buy, and interact with, often invisibly
  • Social media dynamics, where likes, streaks, algorithms, and peer validation shape identity, self-esteem, mood, and behavior in ways that are hard for parents to see or contextualize

For many parents, online safety now includes understanding how algorithms, AI recommendations, and data collection influence children’s behavior over time.

These challenges don’t call for fear or more surveillance. They call for context, guidance, and teaching.

Kids’ First Digital Asset Isn’t Money - It’s Their Data

Every search.
Every click.
Every message.
Every interaction.

Kids begin creating value online long before they understand what value is - or who benefits from it.

Yet research shows:

  • Only 18% of teens understand that companies profit from their data.
  • 57% of parents say they don’t fully understand how their children’s data is used.
  • 52% of parents do not feel equipped to help children navigate AI technology, with only 5% confident in guiding kids on responsible and safe AI use.

Financial literacy still matters. But in today’s digital world, digital literacy is foundational.

Children’s data is often their first digital asset. Their online identity becomes a long-lasting footprint. Learning when and how to share information - and when not to - is now a core life skill.

Why Traditional Online Safety Tools Don’t Go Far Enough

Most parental tools were built for an earlier version of the internet.

They focus on blocking, limiting, and monitoring - approaches that can be useful in specific situations, but often create new problems:

  • increased secrecy
  • power struggles
  • reactive parenting without context
  • children feeling managed rather than supported

Control alone doesn’t teach judgment. Monitoring alone doesn’t build trust.

Many parents want tools that help them understand what’s actually happening, so they can respond thoughtfully rather than react emotionally.

A Different Approach to Online Safety

Technology should support parenting, not replace it.

Tools like Permission.ai can help parents see patterns, routines, and meaningful shifts in digital behavior that are difficult to spot otherwise. When digital activity is translated into clear insight instead of raw data, parents are better equipped to guide their kids calmly and confidently.

This approach helps parents:

  • notice meaningful changes early
  • understand why something may matter
  • respond without hovering or prying

Online safety becomes proactive and supportive - not fear-driven or punitive.

Teaching Responsibility as Part of Online Safety

Digital behavior rarely exists in isolation. It develops over time, across routines, interests, moods, and platforms.

Modern online safety works best when parents can:

  • explain expectations clearly
  • talk through digital choices with confidence
  • guide kids toward healthier habits without guessing

Teaching responsibility helps kids build judgment - not just compliance.

Teach. Reward. Connect.

The most effective digital safety tools help families handle online life together.

That means:

  • Teaching with insight, not guesswork
  • Rewarding positive digital behavior in ways kids understand
  • Reducing conflict by strengthening trust and communication

Kids already understand digital rewards through games, points, and credits. When used thoughtfully, reward systems can reinforce responsibility, connect actions to outcomes, and introduce age-appropriate understanding of digital value.

Parents remain in control, while kids gain early literacy in the digital systems shaping their world.

What Peace of Mind Really Means for Parents

Peace of mind doesn’t come from watching everything.

It comes from knowing you’ll notice what matters.

Parents want to feel:

  • informed, not overwhelmed
  • present, not intrusive
  • prepared, not reactive

When tools surface meaningful changes early and reduce unnecessary noise, families can stay steady - even as digital life evolves.

This is peace of mind built on understanding, not fear.

Built for Families - Not Platforms

Online safety should respect families, children, and the role parents play in shaping healthy digital lives.

Parents want to protect without hovering.
They want awareness without prying.
They want help without losing authority.

As the digital world continues to evolve, families deserve tools that grow with them - supporting connection, responsibility, and trust.

The future of online safety isn’t control.

It’s understanding.