Subscribe to our newsletter!

Submit

Thank you for signing up for our newsletter!

We’re excited to have you with us and will keep you updated with the latest news, insights, and updates straight to your inbox.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Back to Blog
October 23, 2020
|
Read time {time} min

Blockchain 101: Definition, Uses, How It Works, & More

Written by
Permission
Stay in the loop

Get the latest insights, product updates, and news from Permission — shaping the future of user-owned data and AI innovation.

Subscribe

You may have read the word “blockchain” a thousand times without properly understanding what one is. If so, you are definitely not alone, and even if you think you know, read on. You’ll enjoy it, I promise. I wrote it with you in mind.

The blockchain is revolutionary — revolutionary like the invention of the light bulb, not revolutionary like Vladimir Ilyich Lenin — and it will serve you to know why.

No doubt you understand that in order to create a cryptocurrency you need to build a blockchain, and if you didn’t understand that, take my word for it, you do.

What Is Blockchain? A Business Level Explanation

An accurate definition of blockchain would insist that it is a digital database containing transactions (often financial ones) that can be used and shared within a publicly accessible network such as the Internet.

However, let me boil all those words down to the important piece of information that few people tell you when they write about the blockchain. It is this:

The blockchain is a shared database.

When you understand this, it becomes easier to understand why a blockchain is organized in the way it is. So let me exhume the meaning of the above all-important and very short sentence.

A database is a way to share data. Yes, I know, there are lots of different types of databases — relational, document, XML, triplestore, etc. What they all have in common is that they allow data to be shared between different applications. Databases have well-thought-out standard interfaces that any program can use to get at the data. A blockchain is no different in that respect.

What makes it very different is that it enables data to be shared between organizations in a trustable way.

Hopefully, the first question in your mind is this: Why can’t all those other kinds of databases do that?

The answer is simple: They can’t be fully trusted.

Consider two organizations, A and B. A has data in a database and wishes to let B access that data, and add new data. Maybe such an arrangement will work fine, but maybe it won’t. Here’s how it can fail:

  1. An employee who works for A and manages the database thinks up a fraudulent scheme that involves changing data in the database. He has the authority to make such changes and maybe he even finds a way to cover his tracks. As a consequence, B loses money.
  2. A talented hacker who lives in Belarus finds a way to hack into the database and perpetrates a fraudulent scheme, knowing he is safe from extradition even if his identity is discovered.
  3. A cybercriminal in China puts ransomware on A’s network. It encrypts the data and he sends an email demanding payment of $1m dollars in Bitcoin.

Even if both A and B do their level best to make the arrangement work, it can all go catawampus. The Internet is alive with security problems.

A blockchain database is different because it is secure — bullet-proof secure, superman secure, Internet secure.

Because of that if A and B wish to implement a shared database, they can achieve that by implementing a blockchain to manage the data they wish to share. Problem solved.

How Does the Blockchain Work?

I’ll explain step by step.

The first thing to know is that just like other databases, the blockchain writes data away in blocks. Databases have done this since before the deluge because it works way better than writing records away one at a time. So the “block” part of blockchain is no different from other databases. It is the “chain” part that is different.

All the blocks in a blockchain are chained together in the order in which they were created. The first block is connected to the second block, and the second block is connected to the third block and the third block is connected to the fourth block, now hear the word of the Lord.

The fact that they are connected is no big deal, it’s how they are connected that matters. They are connected by a hash.

Unless you’re a programmer type, you won’t know what a hash is. Let me tell you. Firstly, it has nothing at all to do with hash browns or hashish. A hash is a mathematical function that can be applied to a string of binary information, such as, well, a block of data that you want to write to a database.

I could try to explain the math, but let’s not bother. I’ll assume that you waved goodbye to hard mathematics sometime during your education and you are in no hurry to get reacquainted. Just accept that you can apply a hashing function to a block of data and it will spit out a string of numbers and characters like this: 39A1H55ZZ5178.

What’s really sneaky about the hash function is that if you change just one piece of data, even a single bit, the hash value that the hash function spits out will also change. So the blockchain, instead of just writing the block of data away, attaches the hash value of the previous block to the block, then hashes the block, and then writes the block away with the hash value it calculated.

So now the stored block looks like this: Hash-value-of-previous-block, block data, Hash-value-of-this-block.

And this means that:

  1. Every block knows which was the previous block.
  2. You cannot change any data in the block or the hash value of the previous block without changing this block’s hash value.
  3. But if you change this block’s hash value, you will break the chain, because the hash value is already being used to build the next block.

In summary, this means that the block has become unchangeable — as unchangeable as the stars in the sky.

What Makes the Blockchain So Secure?

Now, if you have a criminal turn of mind, you may be thinking:

Wait a minute…

What is to stop me from taking control of the computer running the blockchain software, unraveling a few blocks, then altering a few records to grab a stack of someone else’s Bitcoin and drop them into my personal wallet, and then rewriting all the details with new hash values?

The answer is Consensus.

Consensus stops you from doing that. In practice, there won’t be just one computer creating new blocks, there will be many. In the case of Bitcoin, for example, there are thousands. And because the Bitcoin blockchain was the first blockchain, I’m going to use the way it works to explain consensus.

The blockchain doesn’t live on just one server computer, it is copied across a multitude. Each one of these servers is competing obsessively-compulsively to write the next block.

To enable this desperate crush of computers to compete in this sprint, all the transactions are sent to all of them. No computer is allowed to write the next block without solving a mathematical computing problem which relates to the data values stored in the block.

It’s a hashing problem of a kind, but I’ll not try to explain it, I’ll just provide an appropriate link for the benefit of those who are not mathematically challenged.

It’s a race against time, but the computing problem has been constructed in such a way that no particular computer can be guaranteed to win. Thus, it is impossible to predict which computer will write the next block.

The first computer that solves the problem gets that privilege and is rewarded with 6.25 Bitcoin — no small reward at current prices. This arrangement for mining Bitcoin is called “Proof of Work” because the victorious computer is able to prove that it did the work to find an answer.

If you are thinking, “that’s a completely goofy way of writing a one-megabyte block of data”, I agree with you. Furiously.

Think about it. You get thousands of computers to compete to solve a problem and you give the winner a prize.

I mean that has to cost, doesn’t it?

Yes, it does. It costs plenty. In fact, with Bitcoin, it is fabulously expensive. It has been estimated that Bitcoin mining consumes about sixty-one terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity per year, which is (and I am not lying through my back teeth here) about as much electricity every year as the country of Switzerland.

And on top of that, there’s the cost of the Bitcoin mining computers which you cannot buy by the truckload at Dollar Tree. You will pay over $1,000 for just one and much more for what is termed “a mining rig”. That’s multi-millions of dollars of silicon tied up in mining Bitcoin. And by the way, those are specialist computers that can only be used for mining.

Even if you get your electricity cheap, for example in Iceland for 6 cents a Kwh, that still amounts to $3.66 billion per year.

How Does This Relate to Blockchain?

Bitcoin mining didn’t start out expensive. When the infant Bitcoin first emerged from the maternity ward, most of the mining was done on dusty old seen-better-days computers.

Back in the day, prior to July 2010, you could buy Bitcoin for less than a cent, and in those days a cent bought you about six-kilowatt minutes of electricity. Aside from a handful of geeks and crazy coders, nobody was mining Bitcoin.

That’s the bizarre business dynamic of Bitcoin; mining activity is driven by the price of the coin.

As the price of the coin rose it attracted more miners. Eventually, there were too many and some dropped out. Others realized that they could make more money by using better computers, making those dusty old PCs redundant. Powerful gaming computers gave up gaming and took up mining.

It became an arms race.

Chip manufacturers realized they could make money by designing chips that were dedicated to mining Bitcoin. These were called ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits).

That isn’t the only factor at play here. It’s complicated to explain, but it only consumes the rest of this paragraph, so feel free to skip past it. The difficulty of the mathematical hashing problem can be altered and is regularly adjusted in a way that directly relates to an estimate of the computer power deployed for mining. This adjustment is made every 2016 blocks (about every 2 weeks) in order to keep the average time between writing a new block to about 10 minutes.

   

If you are wondering who the hell thought up this scheme… to impose a consensus system on the writing away of blocks of data to a blockchain, which has resulted in thousands of specialized computers competitively solving math problems 24 hours a day to earn the right to write the next block, while consuming enough electricity to keep the lights on in Switzerland, and thereby earning money…  the answer is Satoshi Nakamoto.

Who Is Satoshi Nakamoto?

That’s a question I cannot answer because Satoshi Nakamoto is a pseudonym. If you’re thinking “Oh, he’s one of those modest Japanese guys you encounter in Ninja movies who is obsessed with economics and good at playing Go”, you may be right.

Or maybe he’s a shady ex-KGB operative who intends to undermine the US Dollar. Or maybe he’s a Libertarian hacktivist who thinks he’s striking a blow for financial freedom.

In a world where everyone seems desperate to grab a minimum of 15 minutes of fame, perhaps the most famous cryptographer since Alan Turing has decided to stay anonymous and has covered his tracks so well that nobody seems to know who he is. Perhaps he read about what the Brits did to Alan Turing and decided that anonymity had very definite virtues.

But never mind. The scheme that Satoshi Nakamoto invented: digital blockchain currencies and mining for consensus, was a brilliant conception. He will go down in history as one of the world’s great innovators — and because he was anonymous, every country on the planet will probably claim him as their own.

Species of Consensus

The Bitcoin blockchain has stood the test of time. It has never been successfully hacked and it has launched the value of its cryptocurrency into the stratosphere.

It has proved itself despite the fact that it has been declared dead over 380 times. This includes pronouncements by such legendary luminaries as Steven Mnuchin, Nouriel Roubini, Warren Buffet, and Paul Krugman to mention just a few.

However, even its avid fans must surely understand that there has to be a better way of achieving block writing consensus than by chewing up all of Switzerland’s electricity. And indeed there is. Think about it.

Here’s what we are gunning for: we want a network of a significant number of computers none of whom can conspire with each other to change the contents of the latest block. If we can’t achieve that then we do not have “immutability” and thus the blockchain is no more reliable than any other kind of database.

We need to limit the ownership of these computers so that no single provider of such resources can dominate the writing of blocks, and neither can any cartel of resource providers. For the record, achieving dominance of the population of block-writing computers is called a 51% attack. If you can mount a 51% attack you destroy the security of the blockchain and the currency that it supports.

Actually, there are many schemes for doing this that do not involve mining. The most prominent is called Proof Of Stake where a number of resource providers (who are in effect stakeholders) provide computers for block-writing and the computer that gets to write the next block is determined in some unpredictable way that does not involve electricity-hungry mathematics.

In fact, there are many different consensus methods: Aside from the two already discussed, there is: Delegated Proof of Stake (DPOS), Proof of Capacity (POC), Proof of Elapsed Time (POET), Consensus as a Service (CaaS), Proof of Identity (POI), and Proof of Authority (POA) — the last of which is employed by the ASK blockchain.

If you want more details, feel free to Google.

What Is the Blockchain Used For?

Ok, so we know you can use blockchain technology to create a currency, but what else can you use it for?

The obvious place to look is wherever the sharing of data securely can be a problem. Here are some examples.

  1. Payment Information. So obviously a blockchain is a great vehicle for storing payment information. Sure you can use it for cryptocurrency payments, that was its first application. But, actually, banks will probably end up using it as payment technology for most of what they do. Many of them are already using Ripple for just that purpose.
  2. Government Data. It’s likely that governments will eventually use the blockchain for digital IDs, making public records available and even (horror of horrors) bullet-proof incorruptible voting (Dictators, take note).
  3. Healthcare Data: This is an obvious application, particularly because security is a big deal in the healthcare industry. Medical records are difficult to share and can be plagued by inaccuracy. On a blockchain, they will be accurate, secure, and easily shared with medical professionals who are approved by you.
  4. Insurance Data: Insurance is a similar area to healthcare in that data needs to be trustworthy and confidential. With the use of smart contracts (space forbids from explaining this incredibly useful feature of the blockchain), most of the customer interactions involved in making insurance claims would be handled with extraordinary efficiency. No more hassling your insurer week after week for your payout.

There’s also a really big area of blockchain applications for supply chain data.

The Blockchain and the Supply Chain

Do you like salmon? Most people do. Do you like genuine wild-caught salmon?

Maybe you’ve never had it. Quite possibly you think you have but you haven’t.

The conservation group Oceana produced a report on this very topic. During winter 2013-2014 researchers collected 82 samples of salmon labeled “wild” from restaurants and grocery stores in Chicago, New York, Washington, D.C., and Virginia, and sneakily did DNA tests on them.

It turned out that 43% of the salmon was fraudulently labeled. 69% of the mislabeled fish were farmed Atlantic salmon. Cheaper species of salmon were labeled as top quality Chinook. And the mislabelling was more common in restaurants than grocery stores.

In a supply chain that is built on the blockchain or a series of blockchains, such food fraud is harder to perpetrate. Did that Beluga Caviar really come from the Black Sea? Did that Roquefort really come to maturity in a cave near Roquefort-sur-Soulzon?

With the blockchain, such frauds will be harder to perpetrate.

Is the Blockchain the Future?

I have no doubt that the blockchain is the future of shared databases. It is simply the best technology that has ever been created for sharing data in a secure and trustworthy manner. The technology may evolve over time as all technology does, but it will not be superseded.

If you don’t believe me, just wait, and wait and wait. If you are not already using blockchain technology, you will be in a year or two. You will see more and more of it. Eventually, it will be as common as french fries in a fast-food joint.

And if, in the coming years, the blockchain dies a death and disappears — well, I was obviously wrong.

Recent articles

Your ASK Wallet, Now Powered by Coinbase

Sep 22nd, 2026
|
{time} read time

We've partnered with Coinbase to bring best-in-class wallet technology to our community.

Today we're updating the technology that powers your ASK wallet. Here's what's changing, what it means for you, and what stays exactly the same.

What's changing

We've moved your Permission wallet to Coinbase's platform. What that means in plain language is this: starting today, you are in full control of your ASK. When you click to send, redeem, or manage your balance, the transaction happens from your account, signed by your login. We no longer hold your wallet keys. Coinbase does, on your behalf, under your authority.

We chose Coinbase's embedded wallet specifically because it brings institutional-grade security to our users without requiring you to manage anything yourself. The infrastructure is Coinbase's. The wallet is yours.

Beyond the custody change, our users now have a wallet that can go wherever they go: exportable, cross-chain ready, and backed by a platform that serves millions of people around the world. We're proud to bring that to our community.

What it means to control your own keys

As Permission has grown, we felt strongly that your funds should be held by a platform built specifically for that purpose, with the security standards and regulatory rigor that come with it. Moving to Coinbase's embedded wallet reflects that commitment.

With today's change, Coinbase secures your private key inside their systems, and only your Permission login can authorize transactions. When you click to send or redeem ASK, the transaction is authorized by you, through your login. We are no longer part of that process.

What this means practically: your wallet operates on its own, independent of Permission. Treat your Permission login like you would a bank password. It is now the key to your wallet. If you ever want to take your wallet entirely outside of Permission, Coinbase supports key export and that option is yours.

What Coinbase sees

Because Coinbase is now part of the infrastructure, your email address, account identifier, and wallet information are shared with them for the purpose of operating the wallet. For details on how Coinbase handles this data, you can review their embedded wallet documentation and their privacy information.

For how Permission handles your data, our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy govern that relationship, as they always have.

What stays the same

Everything you experience in the app. Earning ASK, redeeming it, transferring it, viewing your balance, managing your family. None of that changes.

And, what does change, we're excited about: key export, cross-chain support, and institutional-grade security. These are capabilities that would have taken years to build in-house and that Coinbase has spent that time perfecting. We chose to partner with the best-in-class, and our product and users will be better for it.

If you have questions, support is always here.

The Permission Team 🤝

What Is Family Friendly AI™?

Sep 9th, 2026
|
{time} read time

Only 15% of people globally say they trust AI systems, and 72% of parents are concerned about AI’s impact on their children.

AI is quickly becoming part of everyday family life, but Big Tech wasn’t built with families in mind. Family Friendly AI is technology intentionally designed for families, giving parents visibility into their children’s digital lives, guidance when they need it, and tools to encourage positive behavior.

5 Things That Make AI Family Friendly

1. Your family owns its data.

‍Your family’s data is never sold. It belongs to your family, and you stay in control of it.

2. Parents know what’s happening online.

‍Family Friendly AI gives parents visibility into their children’s digital lives, helping them fully understand how their children use and interact with technology.

3. It motivates children with rewards and incentives.

‍Parents can set rewards and incentives to encourage positive behaviors and help their children build better habits around technology and beyond.

4. It gives parents coaching and inspiration.

‍Parenting in a digital world comes with challenges that screen-time limits alone can’t help with. Family Friendly AI gives parents personalized AI-insights and guidance to help them navigate what their children are doing online and decide what to do next.

5. It earns families' trust.

‍Technology for families should have a higher bar. The companies building it should stand behind it with an unconditional, no-questions-asked money-back guarantee.

It’s time for AI, crypto, and the technology shaping our children’s lives to meet the family-friendly standard.

Big Tobacco Had Its Reckoning. Now It’s Big Tech’s Turn.

Aug 12th, 2026
|
{time} read time

The floodgates are open.

Thousands of lawsuits are moving forward. States are writing new rules for kids online. And lawmakers are beginning to tell AI companies what they can and cannot do when children use their products.

And you don't have to look far to see it happening...

The courts: 3,000+ lawsuits get the green light

On August 10, the Ninth Circuit allowed more than 3,000 lawsuits against Meta, Google/YouTube, TikTok and Snap to move forward.

The cases allege that the companies deliberately designed features of their platforms to be addictive, particularly for young users.

The tech companies had argued that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protected them from the claims. The court rejected their attempt to use Section 230 to stop the litigation at this stage, finding that it provides a defense rather than immunity from being sued.

At their core, these cases are allegations about the platforms themselves: how they were designed, how they kept people engaged, and what responsibility the companies bear for the consequences.

The companies will still have the opportunity to defend themselves against those allegations.

But with more than 3,000 cases now getting the chance to be heard, this is getting harder to argue away.

New Jersey: families get a way to enforce the rules

One day later, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill signed the New Jersey Kids Code Act into law.

The law establishes new design and privacy requirements for covered online services likely to be accessed by minors. Among other provisions, it requires high privacy settings by default, restricts certain push notifications, prohibits dark patterns for minors, limits how children's personal data can be used and retained, and places restrictions on targeted advertising.

But one provision in particular changes the accountability equation: a private right of action.

An individual under 18 who is injured by a violation can bring a claim under the law, with statutory damages of $5,000 per violation. Parents may also bring an action on a minor's behalf.

Which is legal language for something pretty simple: families don't have to wait around for a regulator to act. They can take companies to court themselves.

Colorado: AI safety starts becoming a legal requirement

Then there's Colorado.

Earlier this year, Governor Jared Polis signed Colorado HB 26-1263, establishing specific requirements for operators of conversational AI services.

And this one is worth paying attention to because the law doesn't simply tell AI companies to "keep kids safe." It starts defining what that actually means.

Operators must estimate users' ages. When dealing with minors, the law requires recurring disclosures that they are interacting with AI rather than a person and establishes protections around sexually explicit interactions.

It also addresses one of the most unsettling questions surrounding companion-style AI: emotional dependence.

The law requires safeguards designed to prevent conversational AI from producing statements that simulate emotional dependence. It also requires protocols for responding to suicidal ideation and self-harm, privacy and account-management tools for minors and parents or guardians, and reporting requirements intended to help regulators evaluate whether those safeguards are actually working.

The law takes effect January 1, 2027.

For companies building conversational AI, that's a meaningful shift. Child safety is moving beyond a set of voluntary guardrails companies write for themselves. In Colorado, some of those guardrails are becoming law.

It's no coincidence that this is all happening at once.

Big Tobacco didn't wake up one morning and discover the world had changed its mind. The reckoning came piece by piece, until lawsuits became regulation and an industry that had spent decades setting its own standards was finally forced to take responsibility for the harm its products caused.

We're watching that shift happen again.

For years, the responsibility for keeping kids safe online has fallen on parents.

Set the parental controls. Check the privacy settings. Watch the screen time. Know which apps they're using. Figure out who they're talking to. Keep up with every new platform, algorithm and now AI chatbot entering their lives.

All while the technology on the other side of the screen gets more sophisticated by the month.

Now courts and lawmakers are starting to ask the companies building that technology a much more uncomfortable question:

If children are using your products, what are you doing to keep them safe?

For families, that's the shift that matters most.

This isn't another round of false promises to "do better."

This is legislation. These are lawsuits. This is accountability beginning to have teeth.

Parents will always have the role of protecting their children online. We happen to believe they should have far more visibility and control over the technology entering their families' lives, not less.

But parents cannot be the entire safety system.

The law is making clear that the companies designing the products, writing the algorithms and building the AI our kids interact with have a responsibility, too.

And when they fail to meet it, they'll finally be held accountable.

ChatGPTs Births A Parenting Tool That Needs Some Image Repair

Aug 4th, 2026
|
{time} read time

Sam Altman keeps pitching AI as a co-parent. The reason parents aren't buying isn't nostalgia, it's the lawsuits.

Last Friday, Sam Altman had an idea he was excited about. Hook your family calendar up to ChatGPT, tell it what your kids are into, and every morning on the drive to school it'll produce a little podcast: one kid's soccer game that afternoon, another kid's birthday coming up, maybe some news. He called it a "cool use case."

What should’ve felt really innovative, landed like the opening scene of a bleak dystopian movie. Two kids in the back, one parent up front, and a smooth synthetic voice narrating, to everyone present, the lives of everyone present. "Later today, Maya has soccer." Maya, who has soccer, looks out the window. Nobody says anything, because the podcast is saying it for them.

The internet population caught what we caught. The reply that stuck came from Alex Hirsch, creator of Disney’s Animated series, Gravity Falls. It was seven poignant words: "What if you just talked to your children?" That was the entire rebuttal, and it traveled a great deal further than the thing it was rebutting. Altman's post drew somewhere around 9,600 likes. Hirsch's reply cleared 120,000. On the CEO's own platform, the crowd took a vote, and the crowd chose the small talk.

Now, we want to be fair here, because the easy thing is to dunk and move on. But we’re parents here at Permission and anyone who has done the 7:40 a.m. drive on four hours of sleep, refereeing a backseat dispute about who touched whom first, knows the exact fantasy of a button that handles the morning. That instinct isn't a character flaw. It's a Tuesday.

But this wasn't a one-off. Altman has been quietly auditioning AI for the co-parent role for a while now. On The Tonight Show in December 2025 he said he couldn't imagine having to "raise a newborn without ChatGPT" then added that people had managed the trick for a few hundred thousand years without it. Also, last year, in a podcast hosted by Andrew Mayne, Altman admitted that people might form “problematic parasocial relationships” to a chatbot. (You know, the one-sided kind that we usually reserve for celebrities we've never met.) He sees the hazards clearly. He's pitching the product anyway.

When visibility turns into vulnerability.

The reason parents flinched at the idea of carpooling with a chatbot for school drop off isn't that they're allergic to convenience. It's that the company making the offer is, right now, being sued by multiple families who say its chatbot played a role in their loved ones' spiraling delusions and, in the worst cases, their deaths. OpenAI says it is continually improving how its models handle sensitive conversations, and that work genuinely matters. But you can see the problem. "Let me into your calendar, your commute, and your kids personal details" is a big ask from anyone. It is a much bigger ask from a company currently explaining itself in court.

Trust isn't a feature you ship in the next update. It's something people hand you slowly, and take back all at once.

Here's where we should admit an interest. We build Permission on a belief that sounds boring until you sit with it: your data belongs to you. With Permission your kids’ browsing history doesn’t get shipped out to the open internet. Not to a model, not to a growth chart, not to whoever posts the next cool use case. And the closer AI creeps toward our kids (and it is creeping, because kids are already asking it everything) the more one question starts to outrank all the others:

Where is the line between parenting and outsourcing parenting?

Because "parenting tool" is doing a lot of quiet work in that phrase. A tool is a hammer. It lives in a drawer, it does one honest thing, and it does not ask to read your child's messages or move into the family calendar. When a company calls its chatbot a "parenting tool," it's worth asking, gently, which word they mean. The tool part, or the parenting part.

We happen to think AI can be genuinely, unglamorously useful to families. Not by doing the talking for you, but by handing you the context you'd otherwise miss instead of a thousand panicked notifications, and then getting out of the way so you can make the call. That's a real distinction, and it deserves its own piece.

So take this as Part One: the news, the flinch, and the reason the flinch is earned. In Part Two, we'll make the harder and more hopeful argument that you can let AI help you parent without completely handing over your family secrets. There is a version of this where the grown-ups stay in charge. We think it's the only version worth building.

For now, the seven best words anyone has offered on the whole affair still belong to Hirsch. So we'll give him the last one, too.

What if you just talked to your children?

‍